-
ce.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/teamstepps/longtermcare/sitetools/ts2-0ltc_sample_course_evalform.pdf
April 24, 2017 - Poor, inadequate, did not meet, ineffective
2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective
3 = Excellent … exceeded,
very effective
Module 01: Introduction – 50 minutes
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 02: Team Structure – 50 minutes
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … Poor, inadequate, did not meet, ineffective
2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective
3 = Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 04: Leading Teams – 50 minutes
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
-
www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2022-MOSOPS-Database-Report-Part-II-508.pdf
January 01, 2022 - (Item G1a)
Excellent or Very good 69% 78% 74% 69% 63% 61% 56%
5 - Excellent 35% 43% 36% 33% 28% 26% … (Item G2)
Excellent or Very good 64% 76% 71% 66% 57% 58% 51%
5 - Excellent 27% 35% 30% 27% 23% 20% … (Item G1a)
Excellent or Very good 71% 60%
5 - Excellent 36% 23%
4 - Very good 35% 37%
3 - Good … (Item G1b)
Excellent or Very good 73% 64%
5 - Excellent 36% 24%
4 - Very good 37% 40%
3 - Good … (Item G2)
Excellent or Very good 67% 56%
5 - Excellent 29% 18%
4 - Very good 38% 39%
3 - Good
-
ce.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2022-MOSOPS-Database-Report-Part-II-508.pdf
January 01, 2022 - (Item G1a)
Excellent or Very good 69% 78% 74% 69% 63% 61% 56%
5 - Excellent 35% 43% 36% 33% 28% 26% … (Item G2)
Excellent or Very good 64% 76% 71% 66% 57% 58% 51%
5 - Excellent 27% 35% 30% 27% 23% 20% … (Item G1a)
Excellent or Very good 71% 60%
5 - Excellent 36% 23%
4 - Very good 35% 37%
3 - Good … (Item G1b)
Excellent or Very good 73% 64%
5 - Excellent 36% 24%
4 - Very good 37% 40%
3 - Good … (Item G2)
Excellent or Very good 67% 56%
5 - Excellent 29% 18%
4 - Very good 38% 39%
3 - Good
-
pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2022-MOSOPS-Database-Report-Part-II-508.pdf
January 01, 2022 - (Item G1a)
Excellent or Very good 69% 78% 74% 69% 63% 61% 56%
5 - Excellent 35% 43% 36% 33% 28% 26% … (Item G2)
Excellent or Very good 64% 76% 71% 66% 57% 58% 51%
5 - Excellent 27% 35% 30% 27% 23% 20% … (Item G1a)
Excellent or Very good 71% 60%
5 - Excellent 36% 23%
4 - Very good 35% 37%
3 - Good … (Item G1b)
Excellent or Very good 73% 64%
5 - Excellent 36% 24%
4 - Very good 37% 40%
3 - Good … (Item G2)
Excellent or Very good 67% 56%
5 - Excellent 29% 18%
4 - Very good 38% 39%
3 - Good
-
pbrn.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2022-MOSOPS-Database-Report-Part-II-508.pdf
January 01, 2022 - (Item G1a)
Excellent or Very good 69% 78% 74% 69% 63% 61% 56%
5 - Excellent 35% 43% 36% 33% 28% 26% … (Item G2)
Excellent or Very good 64% 76% 71% 66% 57% 58% 51%
5 - Excellent 27% 35% 30% 27% 23% 20% … (Item G1a)
Excellent or Very good 71% 60%
5 - Excellent 36% 23%
4 - Very good 35% 37%
3 - Good … (Item G1b)
Excellent or Very good 73% 64%
5 - Excellent 36% 24%
4 - Very good 37% 40%
3 - Good … (Item G2)
Excellent or Very good 67% 56%
5 - Excellent 29% 18%
4 - Very good 38% 39%
3 - Good
-
www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2020_MOSOPS_Part_II_508.pdf
January 01, 2020 - (G1a)
Excellent or Very good 77% 76% 71% 71% 66% 65% 71%
5 - Excellent 42% 37% 37% 34% 30% 28% 32% … (G1b)
Excellent or Very good 75% 75% 71% 70% 67% 69% 75%
5 - Excellent 37% 34% 34% 32% 31% … (G1c)
Excellent or Very good 64% 63% 55% 56% 50% 49% 48%
5 - Excellent 29% 26% 24% 23% 19% 18% 17% … (G1d)
Excellent or Very good 70% 69% 64% 61% 57% 56% 56%
5 - Excellent 36% 28% 28% 25% 21% 22% 20% … (G2)
Excellent or Very good 75% 73% 69% 68% 62% 61% 65%
5 - Excellent 38% 32% 31% 28% 25% 23% 25%
-
ce.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2020_MOSOPS_Part_II_508.pdf
January 01, 2020 - (G1a)
Excellent or Very good 77% 76% 71% 71% 66% 65% 71%
5 - Excellent 42% 37% 37% 34% 30% 28% 32% … (G1b)
Excellent or Very good 75% 75% 71% 70% 67% 69% 75%
5 - Excellent 37% 34% 34% 32% 31% … (G1c)
Excellent or Very good 64% 63% 55% 56% 50% 49% 48%
5 - Excellent 29% 26% 24% 23% 19% 18% 17% … (G1d)
Excellent or Very good 70% 69% 64% 61% 57% 56% 56%
5 - Excellent 36% 28% 28% 25% 21% 22% 20% … (G2)
Excellent or Very good 75% 73% 69% 68% 62% 61% 65%
5 - Excellent 38% 32% 31% 28% 25% 23% 25%
-
pbrn.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2020_MOSOPS_Part_II_508.pdf
January 01, 2020 - (G1a)
Excellent or Very good 77% 76% 71% 71% 66% 65% 71%
5 - Excellent 42% 37% 37% 34% 30% 28% 32% … (G1b)
Excellent or Very good 75% 75% 71% 70% 67% 69% 75%
5 - Excellent 37% 34% 34% 32% 31% … (G1c)
Excellent or Very good 64% 63% 55% 56% 50% 49% 48%
5 - Excellent 29% 26% 24% 23% 19% 18% 17% … (G1d)
Excellent or Very good 70% 69% 64% 61% 57% 56% 56%
5 - Excellent 36% 28% 28% 25% 21% 22% 20% … (G2)
Excellent or Very good 75% 73% 69% 68% 62% 61% 65%
5 - Excellent 38% 32% 31% 28% 25% 23% 25%
-
pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2020_MOSOPS_Part_II_508.pdf
January 01, 2020 - (G1a)
Excellent or Very good 77% 76% 71% 71% 66% 65% 71%
5 - Excellent 42% 37% 37% 34% 30% 28% 32% … (G1b)
Excellent or Very good 75% 75% 71% 70% 67% 69% 75%
5 - Excellent 37% 34% 34% 32% 31% … (G1c)
Excellent or Very good 64% 63% 55% 56% 50% 49% 48%
5 - Excellent 29% 26% 24% 23% 19% 18% 17% … (G1d)
Excellent or Very good 70% 69% 64% 61% 57% 56% 56%
5 - Excellent 36% 28% 28% 25% 21% 22% 20% … (G2)
Excellent or Very good 75% 73% 69% 68% 62% 61% 65%
5 - Excellent 38% 32% 31% 28% 25% 23% 25%
-
www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2020_MOSOPS_Infographic.pdf
January 01, 2020 - Highest
Rated Equitable
84%
of respondents reported that their medical office is
"excellent" or … Lowest
Rated Timely
56%
of respondents reported that their medical office is
"excellent" or "very … Patient Safety Rating
Average respondent ratings of their medical office on patient safety
29%
Excellent
-
meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st490/stat490.shtml
June 01, 2016 - However, adults in good to excellent health were more likely to gain other private/public coverage while … period, insured adults in fair/poor health were more likely to lose insurance than those in good to excellent … However, in 2013–2014, non-elderly adults in good to excellent health were more likely than those in … Individuals were classified as being in "excellent, very good, good" health if they were reported to … be in excellent, very good or good health in each of these three rounds.
-
www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/hospital/MOSOPS-2022-Overview-Infographic-508.pdf
January 01, 2022 - Ratings on Quality
Highest Rated
Equitable 83%
of respondents reported that their medical office is
"Excellent … Lowest Rated
Timely 57%
of respondents reported that their medical office is
"Excellent" or "Very … office on patient safety
65%
of respondents gave their medical
office a patient safety rating of
"Excellent … Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Note: Chart totals may not add to 100% due to rounding. … The % "Excellent" or "Very Good" is based on unrounded numbers.
What's Next?
-
ce.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/hospital/MOSOPS-2022-Overview-Infographic-508.pdf
January 01, 2022 - Ratings on Quality
Highest Rated
Equitable 83%
of respondents reported that their medical office is
"Excellent … Lowest Rated
Timely 57%
of respondents reported that their medical office is
"Excellent" or "Very … office on patient safety
65%
of respondents gave their medical
office a patient safety rating of
"Excellent … Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Note: Chart totals may not add to 100% due to rounding. … The % "Excellent" or "Very Good" is based on unrounded numbers.
What's Next?
-
pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/hospital/MOSOPS-2022-Overview-Infographic-508.pdf
January 01, 2022 - Ratings on Quality
Highest Rated
Equitable 83%
of respondents reported that their medical office is
"Excellent … Lowest Rated
Timely 57%
of respondents reported that their medical office is
"Excellent" or "Very … office on patient safety
65%
of respondents gave their medical
office a patient safety rating of
"Excellent … Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Note: Chart totals may not add to 100% due to rounding. … The % "Excellent" or "Very Good" is based on unrounded numbers.
What's Next?
-
pbrn.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/hospital/MOSOPS-2022-Overview-Infographic-508.pdf
January 01, 2022 - Ratings on Quality
Highest Rated
Equitable 83%
of respondents reported that their medical office is
"Excellent … Lowest Rated
Timely 57%
of respondents reported that their medical office is
"Excellent" or "Very … office on patient safety
65%
of respondents gave their medical
office a patient safety rating of
"Excellent … Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Note: Chart totals may not add to 100% due to rounding. … The % "Excellent" or "Very Good" is based on unrounded numbers.
What's Next?
-
www.talkingquality.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/hospital/MOSOPS-2022-Overview-Infographic-508.pdf
January 01, 2022 - Ratings on Quality
Highest Rated
Equitable 83%
of respondents reported that their medical office is
"Excellent … Lowest Rated
Timely 57%
of respondents reported that their medical office is
"Excellent" or "Very … office on patient safety
65%
of respondents gave their medical
office a patient safety rating of
"Excellent … Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Note: Chart totals may not add to 100% due to rounding. … The % "Excellent" or "Very Good" is based on unrounded numbers.
What's Next?
-
pcmh.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/officebasedcare/handouts/courseeval.html
December 01, 2015 - inadequate, did not meet, ineffective
2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective
3 = Excellent … 1
2
3
Comments:
Teaching and Coaching
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … 1
2
3
Comments:
Change Management
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent
To … 1
2
3
Comments:
Measurement
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent
To what … 1
2
3
Comments:
Implementation Planning
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent
-
pbrn.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/officebasedcare/handouts/courseeval.html
December 01, 2015 - inadequate, did not meet, ineffective
2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective
3 = Excellent … 1
2
3
Comments:
Teaching and Coaching
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … 1
2
3
Comments:
Change Management
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent
To … 1
2
3
Comments:
Measurement
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent
To what … 1
2
3
Comments:
Implementation Planning
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent
-
meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/rf36/rf36.shtml
August 01, 2017 - Highlights
Uninsured adults in fair or poor health were more likely than those in good to excellent … health to gain Medicaid coverage from 2013 to 2014 and from 2014 to 2015, while those in good to excellent … For adults in good to excellent health, the rate of gaining coverage was higher in both 2013–2014 (32.2 … Individuals were classified as being in "excellent, very good, good" health if they were reported to … be in excellent, very good, or good health in each of these three rounds.
-
www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/2018mosopsdatabasereport-part2.pdf
April 01, 2018 - (G1a)
Excellent or Very Good 76% 78% 73% 70% 69% 68% 65%
5 - Excellent 41% 42% 37% 34% 32% 30% 29% … (G1b)
Excellent or Very Good 76% 75% 71% 71% 69% 68% 67%
5 - Excellent 37% 39% 35% 33% 31% 29% 31% … (G1d)
Excellent or Very Good 67% 69% 63% 60% 58% 54% 48%
5 - Excellent 32% 32% 27% 26% 22% 20% 16% … (G1a)
Excellent or Very Good 73% 69%
5 - Excellent 38% 31%
4 - Very Good 35% 38%
3 - Good 22% … (G1b)
Excellent or Very Good 73% 68%
5 - Excellent 36% 29%
4 - Very Good 37% 40%
3 - Good 23%