Results

Total Results: over 10,000 records

Showing results for "excellent".

  1. ce.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/teamstepps/longtermcare/sitetools/ts2-0ltc_sample_course_evalform.pdf
    April 24, 2017 - Poor, inadequate, did not meet, ineffective 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective 3 = Excellent … exceeded, very effective Module 01: Introduction – 50 minutes Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3 Comments: Module 02: Team Structure – 50 minutes Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … Poor, inadequate, did not meet, ineffective 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective 3 = Excellent … 1 2 3 Comments: Module 04: Leading Teams – 50 minutes Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
  2. www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2022-MOSOPS-Database-Report-Part-II-508.pdf
    January 01, 2022 - (Item G1a) Excellent or Very good 69% 78% 74% 69% 63% 61% 56% 5 - Excellent 35% 43% 36% 33% 28% 26% … (Item G2) Excellent or Very good 64% 76% 71% 66% 57% 58% 51% 5 - Excellent 27% 35% 30% 27% 23% 20% … (Item G1a) Excellent or Very good 71% 60% 5 - Excellent 36% 23% 4 - Very good 35% 37% 3 - Good … (Item G1b) Excellent or Very good 73% 64% 5 - Excellent 36% 24% 4 - Very good 37% 40% 3 - Good … (Item G2) Excellent or Very good 67% 56% 5 - Excellent 29% 18% 4 - Very good 38% 39% 3 - Good
  3. ce.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2022-MOSOPS-Database-Report-Part-II-508.pdf
    January 01, 2022 - (Item G1a) Excellent or Very good 69% 78% 74% 69% 63% 61% 56% 5 - Excellent 35% 43% 36% 33% 28% 26% … (Item G2) Excellent or Very good 64% 76% 71% 66% 57% 58% 51% 5 - Excellent 27% 35% 30% 27% 23% 20% … (Item G1a) Excellent or Very good 71% 60% 5 - Excellent 36% 23% 4 - Very good 35% 37% 3 - Good … (Item G1b) Excellent or Very good 73% 64% 5 - Excellent 36% 24% 4 - Very good 37% 40% 3 - Good … (Item G2) Excellent or Very good 67% 56% 5 - Excellent 29% 18% 4 - Very good 38% 39% 3 - Good
  4. pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2022-MOSOPS-Database-Report-Part-II-508.pdf
    January 01, 2022 - (Item G1a) Excellent or Very good 69% 78% 74% 69% 63% 61% 56% 5 - Excellent 35% 43% 36% 33% 28% 26% … (Item G2) Excellent or Very good 64% 76% 71% 66% 57% 58% 51% 5 - Excellent 27% 35% 30% 27% 23% 20% … (Item G1a) Excellent or Very good 71% 60% 5 - Excellent 36% 23% 4 - Very good 35% 37% 3 - Good … (Item G1b) Excellent or Very good 73% 64% 5 - Excellent 36% 24% 4 - Very good 37% 40% 3 - Good … (Item G2) Excellent or Very good 67% 56% 5 - Excellent 29% 18% 4 - Very good 38% 39% 3 - Good
  5. pbrn.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2022-MOSOPS-Database-Report-Part-II-508.pdf
    January 01, 2022 - (Item G1a) Excellent or Very good 69% 78% 74% 69% 63% 61% 56% 5 - Excellent 35% 43% 36% 33% 28% 26% … (Item G2) Excellent or Very good 64% 76% 71% 66% 57% 58% 51% 5 - Excellent 27% 35% 30% 27% 23% 20% … (Item G1a) Excellent or Very good 71% 60% 5 - Excellent 36% 23% 4 - Very good 35% 37% 3 - Good … (Item G1b) Excellent or Very good 73% 64% 5 - Excellent 36% 24% 4 - Very good 37% 40% 3 - Good … (Item G2) Excellent or Very good 67% 56% 5 - Excellent 29% 18% 4 - Very good 38% 39% 3 - Good
  6. www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2020_MOSOPS_Part_II_508.pdf
    January 01, 2020 - (G1a) Excellent or Very good 77% 76% 71% 71% 66% 65% 71% 5 - Excellent 42% 37% 37% 34% 30% 28% 32% … (G1b) Excellent or Very good 75% 75% 71% 70% 67% 69% 75% 5 - Excellent 37% 34% 34% 32% 31% … (G1c) Excellent or Very good 64% 63% 55% 56% 50% 49% 48% 5 - Excellent 29% 26% 24% 23% 19% 18% 17% … (G1d) Excellent or Very good 70% 69% 64% 61% 57% 56% 56% 5 - Excellent 36% 28% 28% 25% 21% 22% 20% … (G2) Excellent or Very good 75% 73% 69% 68% 62% 61% 65% 5 - Excellent 38% 32% 31% 28% 25% 23% 25%
  7. ce.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2020_MOSOPS_Part_II_508.pdf
    January 01, 2020 - (G1a) Excellent or Very good 77% 76% 71% 71% 66% 65% 71% 5 - Excellent 42% 37% 37% 34% 30% 28% 32% … (G1b) Excellent or Very good 75% 75% 71% 70% 67% 69% 75% 5 - Excellent 37% 34% 34% 32% 31% … (G1c) Excellent or Very good 64% 63% 55% 56% 50% 49% 48% 5 - Excellent 29% 26% 24% 23% 19% 18% 17% … (G1d) Excellent or Very good 70% 69% 64% 61% 57% 56% 56% 5 - Excellent 36% 28% 28% 25% 21% 22% 20% … (G2) Excellent or Very good 75% 73% 69% 68% 62% 61% 65% 5 - Excellent 38% 32% 31% 28% 25% 23% 25%
  8. pbrn.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2020_MOSOPS_Part_II_508.pdf
    January 01, 2020 - (G1a) Excellent or Very good 77% 76% 71% 71% 66% 65% 71% 5 - Excellent 42% 37% 37% 34% 30% 28% 32% … (G1b) Excellent or Very good 75% 75% 71% 70% 67% 69% 75% 5 - Excellent 37% 34% 34% 32% 31% … (G1c) Excellent or Very good 64% 63% 55% 56% 50% 49% 48% 5 - Excellent 29% 26% 24% 23% 19% 18% 17% … (G1d) Excellent or Very good 70% 69% 64% 61% 57% 56% 56% 5 - Excellent 36% 28% 28% 25% 21% 22% 20% … (G2) Excellent or Very good 75% 73% 69% 68% 62% 61% 65% 5 - Excellent 38% 32% 31% 28% 25% 23% 25%
  9. pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2020_MOSOPS_Part_II_508.pdf
    January 01, 2020 - (G1a) Excellent or Very good 77% 76% 71% 71% 66% 65% 71% 5 - Excellent 42% 37% 37% 34% 30% 28% 32% … (G1b) Excellent or Very good 75% 75% 71% 70% 67% 69% 75% 5 - Excellent 37% 34% 34% 32% 31% … (G1c) Excellent or Very good 64% 63% 55% 56% 50% 49% 48% 5 - Excellent 29% 26% 24% 23% 19% 18% 17% … (G1d) Excellent or Very good 70% 69% 64% 61% 57% 56% 56% 5 - Excellent 36% 28% 28% 25% 21% 22% 20% … (G2) Excellent or Very good 75% 73% 69% 68% 62% 61% 65% 5 - Excellent 38% 32% 31% 28% 25% 23% 25%
  10. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2020_MOSOPS_Infographic.pdf
    January 01, 2020 - Highest Rated Equitable 84% of respondents reported that their medical office is "excellent" or … Lowest Rated Timely 56% of respondents reported that their medical office is "excellent" or "very … Patient Safety Rating Average respondent ratings of their medical office on patient safety 29% Excellent
  11. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st490/stat490.shtml
    June 01, 2016 - However, adults in good to excellent health were more likely to gain other private/public coverage while … period, insured adults in fair/poor health were more likely to lose insurance than those in good to excellent … However, in 2013–2014, non-elderly adults in good to excellent health were more likely than those in … Individuals were classified as being in "excellent, very good, good" health if they were reported to … be in excellent, very good or good health in each of these three rounds.
  12. www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/hospital/MOSOPS-2022-Overview-Infographic-508.pdf
    January 01, 2022 - Ratings on Quality Highest Rated Equitable 83% of respondents reported that their medical office is "Excellent … Lowest Rated Timely 57% of respondents reported that their medical office is "Excellent" or "Very … office on patient safety 65% of respondents gave their medical office a patient safety rating of "ExcellentExcellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Note: Chart totals may not add to 100% due to rounding. … The % "Excellent" or "Very Good" is based on unrounded numbers. What's Next?
  13. ce.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/hospital/MOSOPS-2022-Overview-Infographic-508.pdf
    January 01, 2022 - Ratings on Quality Highest Rated Equitable 83% of respondents reported that their medical office is "Excellent … Lowest Rated Timely 57% of respondents reported that their medical office is "Excellent" or "Very … office on patient safety 65% of respondents gave their medical office a patient safety rating of "ExcellentExcellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Note: Chart totals may not add to 100% due to rounding. … The % "Excellent" or "Very Good" is based on unrounded numbers. What's Next?
  14. pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/hospital/MOSOPS-2022-Overview-Infographic-508.pdf
    January 01, 2022 - Ratings on Quality Highest Rated Equitable 83% of respondents reported that their medical office is "Excellent … Lowest Rated Timely 57% of respondents reported that their medical office is "Excellent" or "Very … office on patient safety 65% of respondents gave their medical office a patient safety rating of "ExcellentExcellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Note: Chart totals may not add to 100% due to rounding. … The % "Excellent" or "Very Good" is based on unrounded numbers. What's Next?
  15. pbrn.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/hospital/MOSOPS-2022-Overview-Infographic-508.pdf
    January 01, 2022 - Ratings on Quality Highest Rated Equitable 83% of respondents reported that their medical office is "Excellent … Lowest Rated Timely 57% of respondents reported that their medical office is "Excellent" or "Very … office on patient safety 65% of respondents gave their medical office a patient safety rating of "ExcellentExcellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Note: Chart totals may not add to 100% due to rounding. … The % "Excellent" or "Very Good" is based on unrounded numbers. What's Next?
  16. www.talkingquality.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/hospital/MOSOPS-2022-Overview-Infographic-508.pdf
    January 01, 2022 - Ratings on Quality Highest Rated Equitable 83% of respondents reported that their medical office is "Excellent … Lowest Rated Timely 57% of respondents reported that their medical office is "Excellent" or "Very … office on patient safety 65% of respondents gave their medical office a patient safety rating of "ExcellentExcellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Note: Chart totals may not add to 100% due to rounding. … The % "Excellent" or "Very Good" is based on unrounded numbers. What's Next?
  17. pcmh.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/officebasedcare/handouts/courseeval.html
    December 01, 2015 - inadequate, did not meet, ineffective 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective 3 = Excellent … 1 2 3 Comments:     Teaching and Coaching Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3 Comments:     Change Management Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent To … 1 2 3 Comments:     Measurement Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent To what … 1 2 3 Comments:     Implementation Planning Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
  18. pbrn.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/officebasedcare/handouts/courseeval.html
    December 01, 2015 - inadequate, did not meet, ineffective 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective 3 = Excellent … 1 2 3 Comments:     Teaching and Coaching Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3 Comments:     Change Management Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent To … 1 2 3 Comments:     Measurement Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent To what … 1 2 3 Comments:     Implementation Planning Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
  19. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/rf36/rf36.shtml
    August 01, 2017 - Highlights Uninsured adults in fair or poor health were more likely than those in good to excellent … health to gain Medicaid coverage from 2013 to 2014 and from 2014 to 2015, while those in good to excellent … For adults in good to excellent health, the rate of gaining coverage was higher in both 2013–2014 (32.2 … Individuals were classified as being in "excellent, very good, good" health if they were reported to … be in excellent, very good, or good health in each of these three rounds.
  20. www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/2018mosopsdatabasereport-part2.pdf
    April 01, 2018 - (G1a) Excellent or Very Good 76% 78% 73% 70% 69% 68% 65% 5 - Excellent 41% 42% 37% 34% 32% 30% 29% … (G1b) Excellent or Very Good 76% 75% 71% 71% 69% 68% 67% 5 - Excellent 37% 39% 35% 33% 31% 29% 31% … (G1d) Excellent or Very Good 67% 69% 63% 60% 58% 54% 48% 5 - Excellent 32% 32% 27% 26% 22% 20% 16% … (G1a) Excellent or Very Good 73% 69% 5 - Excellent 38% 31% 4 - Very Good 35% 38% 3 - Good 22% … (G1b) Excellent or Very Good 73% 68% 5 - Excellent 36% 29% 4 - Very Good 37% 40% 3 - Good 23%