Results

Total Results: over 10,000 records

Showing results for "excellent".

  1. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st354/stat354.shtml
    January 01, 2012 - Those in the bottom half of health care spenders were more likely to report excellent health status, … Those who remained in the bottom half of spenders were more likely to be in excellent health, children … Individuals in excellent health were disproportionately represented among those who remained in the lower … those individuals remaining in the top decile of spenders, only 6.1 percent were reported to be in excellent … by medical expenditures in 2008 that shifted below the first quartile in 2009 were predominantly in excellent
  2. ce.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/research/findings/final-reports/crcscreeningrpt/crcscreentab4-12.html
    April 01, 2018 - status a Fair/poor 203 10.84 — — — — Good 500 15.80 1.54 0.93 2.55 0.091 Excellent … status a Fair/poor 203 10.34 — — — — Good 500 13.40 1.34 0.80 2.26 0.269 Excellent … status a Fair/poor 203 21.18 — — — — Good 500 29.00 1.52 1.03 2.24 0.035 Excellent
  3. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st96/stat96.pdf
    September 01, 2005 - beneficiaries in fair or poor health (27.3 percent) were both more likely than beneficiaries who reported excellent … In 2002, beneficiaries who reported excellent health were the least likely (20.0 percent) to use a statin … respondent was asked to rate the health of each person in the family according to the following categories: excellent … Household Component of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 2002. 27.329.1 20.0 0 10 20 30 40 Excellent
  4. www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2022-mosops-database-report-part-I.pdf
    January 01, 2022 - Lowest Rated Timely 57% of respondents reported that their medical office is "Excellent" or "Very … Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Note: Chart totals may not add to 100% due to rounding. … The% "Excellent" or "Very Good" is based on unrounded numbers. What's Next? … Effective Is based on scientific knowledge. 71% Positive Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor … ” (Poor, Fair, Good, Very good, Excellent).
  5. ce.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2022-mosops-database-report-part-I.pdf
    January 01, 2022 - Lowest Rated Timely 57% of respondents reported that their medical office is "Excellent" or "Very … Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Note: Chart totals may not add to 100% due to rounding. … The% "Excellent" or "Very Good" is based on unrounded numbers. What's Next? … Effective Is based on scientific knowledge. 71% Positive Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor … ” (Poor, Fair, Good, Very good, Excellent).
  6. pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2022-mosops-database-report-part-I.pdf
    January 01, 2022 - Lowest Rated Timely 57% of respondents reported that their medical office is "Excellent" or "Very … Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Note: Chart totals may not add to 100% due to rounding. … The% "Excellent" or "Very Good" is based on unrounded numbers. What's Next? … Effective Is based on scientific knowledge. 71% Positive Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor … ” (Poor, Fair, Good, Very good, Excellent).
  7. pbrn.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2022-mosops-database-report-part-I.pdf
    January 01, 2022 - Lowest Rated Timely 57% of respondents reported that their medical office is "Excellent" or "Very … Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Note: Chart totals may not add to 100% due to rounding. … The% "Excellent" or "Very Good" is based on unrounded numbers. What's Next? … Effective Is based on scientific knowledge. 71% Positive Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor … ” (Poor, Fair, Good, Very good, Excellent).
  8. digital.ahrq.gov/health-it-tools-and-resources/health-it-bibliography/medical-home/house-not-home-keeping-patients
    overemphasize redesign of practices at the expense of patient-centered care, which is the hallmark of excellent
  9. Psn-Pdf (pdf file)

    psnet.ahrq.gov/node/40853/psn-pdf
    October 19, 2011 - adoption-national-quality-forum-safe-practices-magnet-hospitals The Magnet Hospital Program recognizes hospitals with a track record of maintaining an excellent
  10. Psn-Pdf (pdf file)

    psnet.ahrq.gov/node/42250/psn-pdf
    June 03, 2013 - The article provides an excellent example of the ongoing monitoring and adaptation required to effectively
  11. datatools.ahrq.gov/meps-hc/?type=tab&tab=mepschaqc
    January 01, 2015 - health of each person in the family at the time of the interview according to the following categories: excellent … health of each person in the family at the time of the interview according to the following categories: excellent … health of each person in the family at the time of the interview according to the following categories: excellent … health of each person in the family at the time of the interview according to the following categories: excellent … health of each person in the family at the time of the interview according to the following categories: excellent
  12. datatools.ahrq.gov/meps-hc/?type=subtab&tab=mepschaqc&count=2
    January 01, 2015 - health of each person in the family at the time of the interview according to the following categories: excellent … health of each person in the family at the time of the interview according to the following categories: excellent … health of each person in the family at the time of the interview according to the following categories: excellent … health of each person in the family at the time of the interview according to the following categories: excellent … health of each person in the family at the time of the interview according to the following categories: excellent
  13. datatools.ahrq.gov/meps-hc/?type=subtab&tab=mepschaqc&count=3
    January 01, 2015 - health of each person in the family at the time of the interview according to the following categories: excellent … health of each person in the family at the time of the interview according to the following categories: excellent … health of each person in the family at the time of the interview according to the following categories: excellent … health of each person in the family at the time of the interview according to the following categories: excellent … health of each person in the family at the time of the interview according to the following categories: excellent
  14. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/cb8/cb8.pdf
    October 01, 2001 - findings include: Health insurance Access to and use of care The majority of women in America were in excellent … Overall, however, the majority of women of all racial/ethnic groups were in excellent, very good, or … • Women in fair or poor health were more likely than women in excellent, very good, or good health … 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 1.8 Excellent/very good health Good health Fair/poor health Women with … • Women with more than 12 years of education were the most likely to be in excellent or very good health
  15. healthcare411.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/2019-pharmacy-sops-database-report-appendix.pdf
    January 01, 2019 - or Very good 94% 86% 78% Excellent 55% 54% 42% Very good 40% 32% 36% Good 5% 11% 16% Fair 1% … In addition, “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotal shown due to rounding. 2019 … In addition, “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotal shown due to rounding. 2019 … or Very good 85% 84% 92% 78% Excellent 49% 48% 53% 47% Very good 36% 35% 39% 31% Good 11% 12% … In addition, “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotal shown due to rounding.
  16. patientregistry.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/2019-pharmacy-sops-database-report-appendix.pdf
    January 01, 2019 - or Very good 94% 86% 78% Excellent 55% 54% 42% Very good 40% 32% 36% Good 5% 11% 16% Fair 1% … In addition, “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotal shown due to rounding. 2019 … In addition, “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotal shown due to rounding. 2019 … or Very good 85% 84% 92% 78% Excellent 49% 48% 53% 47% Very good 36% 35% 39% 31% Good 11% 12% … In addition, “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotal shown due to rounding.
  17. cahps.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/2019-pharmacy-sops-database-report-appendix.pdf
    January 01, 2019 - or Very good 94% 86% 78% Excellent 55% 54% 42% Very good 40% 32% 36% Good 5% 11% 16% Fair 1% … In addition, “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotal shown due to rounding. 2019 … In addition, “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotal shown due to rounding. 2019 … or Very good 85% 84% 92% 78% Excellent 49% 48% 53% 47% Very good 36% 35% 39% 31% Good 11% 12% … In addition, “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotal shown due to rounding.
  18. ahrqpubs.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/asc/2023-ASC-Database-Report-II.pdf
    January 01, 2023 - o Average percentage of respondents who gave their ASC a Patient Safety Rating of “Excellent” or “Very … (Item F1) Excellent or Very good 89% 87% 86% 85% 83% Excellent 56% 58% 57% 55% 49% Very good … (Item F1) Excellent or Very good 88% 87% 84% 84% 87% 87% 88% 81% 84% Excellent 59% … (Item F1) Excellent or Very good 87% 97% 89% 97% 92% 79% 83% 74% 85% Excellent 59% 81% 50% 78% 68% … (Item F1) Excellent or Very good 93% 83% 82% 89% Excellent 71% 50% 46% 65% Very good 22% 33%
  19. cahps.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/asc/2023-ASC-Database-Report-II.pdf
    January 01, 2023 - o Average percentage of respondents who gave their ASC a Patient Safety Rating of “Excellent” or “Very … (Item F1) Excellent or Very good 89% 87% 86% 85% 83% Excellent 56% 58% 57% 55% 49% Very good … (Item F1) Excellent or Very good 88% 87% 84% 84% 87% 87% 88% 81% 84% Excellent 59% … (Item F1) Excellent or Very good 87% 97% 89% 97% 92% 79% 83% 74% 85% Excellent 59% 81% 50% 78% 68% … (Item F1) Excellent or Very good 93% 83% 82% 89% Excellent 71% 50% 46% 65% Very good 22% 33%
  20. www.cahps.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/2019-pharmacy-sops-database-report-appendix.pdf
    January 01, 2019 - or Very good 94% 86% 78% Excellent 55% 54% 42% Very good 40% 32% 36% Good 5% 11% 16% Fair 1% … In addition, “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotal shown due to rounding. 2019 … In addition, “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotal shown due to rounding. 2019 … or Very good 85% 84% 92% 78% Excellent 49% 48% 53% 47% Very good 36% 35% 39% 31% Good 11% 12% … In addition, “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotal shown due to rounding.