-
meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st354/stat354.shtml
January 01, 2012 - Those in the bottom half of health care spenders were more likely to report excellent health status, … Those who remained in the bottom half of spenders were more likely to be in excellent health, children … Individuals in excellent health were disproportionately represented among those who remained in the lower … those individuals remaining in the top decile of spenders, only 6.1 percent were reported to be in excellent … by medical expenditures in 2008 that shifted below the first quartile in 2009 were predominantly in excellent
-
ce.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/research/findings/final-reports/crcscreeningrpt/crcscreentab4-12.html
April 01, 2018 - status a
Fair/poor
203
10.84
—
—
—
—
Good
500
15.80
1.54
0.93
2.55
0.091
Excellent … status a
Fair/poor
203
10.34
—
—
—
—
Good
500
13.40
1.34
0.80
2.26
0.269
Excellent … status a
Fair/poor
203
21.18
—
—
—
—
Good
500
29.00
1.52
1.03
2.24
0.035
Excellent
-
meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st96/stat96.pdf
September 01, 2005 - beneficiaries in fair or
poor health (27.3 percent)
were both more likely than
beneficiaries who reported
excellent … In 2002, beneficiaries who reported excellent health were the least likely (20.0 percent) to use a statin … respondent was asked to rate the health of each
person in the family according to the following categories: excellent … Household Component of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 2002.
27.329.1
20.0
0
10
20
30
40
Excellent
-
www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2022-mosops-database-report-part-I.pdf
January 01, 2022 - Lowest Rated
Timely 57%
of respondents reported that their medical office is
"Excellent" or "Very … Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Note: Chart totals may not add to 100% due to rounding. … The% "Excellent" or "Very Good" is based on unrounded numbers.
What's Next? … Effective
Is based on scientific
knowledge.
71% Positive
Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor … ” (Poor, Fair, Good, Very good, Excellent).
-
ce.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2022-mosops-database-report-part-I.pdf
January 01, 2022 - Lowest Rated
Timely 57%
of respondents reported that their medical office is
"Excellent" or "Very … Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Note: Chart totals may not add to 100% due to rounding. … The% "Excellent" or "Very Good" is based on unrounded numbers.
What's Next? … Effective
Is based on scientific
knowledge.
71% Positive
Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor … ” (Poor, Fair, Good, Very good, Excellent).
-
pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2022-mosops-database-report-part-I.pdf
January 01, 2022 - Lowest Rated
Timely 57%
of respondents reported that their medical office is
"Excellent" or "Very … Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Note: Chart totals may not add to 100% due to rounding. … The% "Excellent" or "Very Good" is based on unrounded numbers.
What's Next? … Effective
Is based on scientific
knowledge.
71% Positive
Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor … ” (Poor, Fair, Good, Very good, Excellent).
-
pbrn.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2022-mosops-database-report-part-I.pdf
January 01, 2022 - Lowest Rated
Timely 57%
of respondents reported that their medical office is
"Excellent" or "Very … Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Note: Chart totals may not add to 100% due to rounding. … The% "Excellent" or "Very Good" is based on unrounded numbers.
What's Next? … Effective
Is based on scientific
knowledge.
71% Positive
Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor … ” (Poor, Fair, Good, Very good, Excellent).
-
digital.ahrq.gov/health-it-tools-and-resources/health-it-bibliography/medical-home/house-not-home-keeping-patients
overemphasize redesign of practices at the expense of patient-centered care, which is the hallmark of excellent
-
psnet.ahrq.gov/node/40853/psn-pdf
October 19, 2011 - adoption-national-quality-forum-safe-practices-magnet-hospitals
The Magnet Hospital Program recognizes hospitals with a track record of maintaining an excellent
-
psnet.ahrq.gov/node/42250/psn-pdf
June 03, 2013 - The article provides an excellent example of
the ongoing monitoring and adaptation required to effectively
-
datatools.ahrq.gov/meps-hc/?type=tab&tab=mepschaqc
January 01, 2015 - health of each person in the family at the time of the interview according to the following categories: excellent … health of each person in the family at the time of the interview according to the following categories: excellent … health of each person in the family at the time of the interview according to the following categories: excellent … health of each person in the family at the time of the interview according to the following categories: excellent … health of each person in the family at the time of the interview according to the following categories: excellent
-
datatools.ahrq.gov/meps-hc/?type=subtab&tab=mepschaqc&count=2
January 01, 2015 - health of each person in the family at the time of the interview according to the following categories: excellent … health of each person in the family at the time of the interview according to the following categories: excellent … health of each person in the family at the time of the interview according to the following categories: excellent … health of each person in the family at the time of the interview according to the following categories: excellent … health of each person in the family at the time of the interview according to the following categories: excellent
-
datatools.ahrq.gov/meps-hc/?type=subtab&tab=mepschaqc&count=3
January 01, 2015 - health of each person in the family at the time of the interview according to the following categories: excellent … health of each person in the family at the time of the interview according to the following categories: excellent … health of each person in the family at the time of the interview according to the following categories: excellent … health of each person in the family at the time of the interview according to the following categories: excellent … health of each person in the family at the time of the interview according to the following categories: excellent
-
meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/cb8/cb8.pdf
October 01, 2001 - findings include:
Health insurance
Access to and use
of care
The majority of women in
America were in excellent … Overall, however, the
majority of women of all
racial/ethnic groups were in
excellent, very good, or … • Women in fair or poor health
were more likely than women
in excellent, very good, or
good health … 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1.8
Excellent/very good health
Good health
Fair/poor health
Women with … • Women with more than 12
years of education were the
most likely to be in excellent
or very good health
-
healthcare411.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/2019-pharmacy-sops-database-report-appendix.pdf
January 01, 2019 - or Very good 94% 86% 78%
Excellent 55% 54% 42%
Very good 40% 32% 36%
Good 5% 11% 16%
Fair 1% … In addition, “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotal shown due to rounding.
2019 … In addition, “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotal shown due to rounding.
2019 … or Very good 85% 84% 92% 78%
Excellent 49% 48% 53% 47%
Very good 36% 35% 39% 31%
Good 11% 12% … In addition, “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotal shown due to rounding.
-
patientregistry.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/2019-pharmacy-sops-database-report-appendix.pdf
January 01, 2019 - or Very good 94% 86% 78%
Excellent 55% 54% 42%
Very good 40% 32% 36%
Good 5% 11% 16%
Fair 1% … In addition, “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotal shown due to rounding.
2019 … In addition, “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotal shown due to rounding.
2019 … or Very good 85% 84% 92% 78%
Excellent 49% 48% 53% 47%
Very good 36% 35% 39% 31%
Good 11% 12% … In addition, “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotal shown due to rounding.
-
cahps.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/2019-pharmacy-sops-database-report-appendix.pdf
January 01, 2019 - or Very good 94% 86% 78%
Excellent 55% 54% 42%
Very good 40% 32% 36%
Good 5% 11% 16%
Fair 1% … In addition, “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotal shown due to rounding.
2019 … In addition, “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotal shown due to rounding.
2019 … or Very good 85% 84% 92% 78%
Excellent 49% 48% 53% 47%
Very good 36% 35% 39% 31%
Good 11% 12% … In addition, “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotal shown due to rounding.
-
ahrqpubs.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/asc/2023-ASC-Database-Report-II.pdf
January 01, 2023 - o Average percentage of respondents who gave their ASC a Patient Safety Rating of
“Excellent” or “Very … (Item F1)
Excellent or Very good 89% 87% 86% 85% 83%
Excellent 56% 58% 57% 55% 49%
Very good … (Item F1)
Excellent or Very good 88% 87% 84% 84% 87% 87% 88% 81% 84%
Excellent 59% … (Item F1)
Excellent or Very good 87% 97% 89% 97% 92% 79% 83% 74% 85%
Excellent 59% 81% 50% 78% 68% … (Item F1)
Excellent or Very good 93% 83% 82% 89%
Excellent 71% 50% 46% 65%
Very good 22% 33%
-
cahps.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/asc/2023-ASC-Database-Report-II.pdf
January 01, 2023 - o Average percentage of respondents who gave their ASC a Patient Safety Rating of
“Excellent” or “Very … (Item F1)
Excellent or Very good 89% 87% 86% 85% 83%
Excellent 56% 58% 57% 55% 49%
Very good … (Item F1)
Excellent or Very good 88% 87% 84% 84% 87% 87% 88% 81% 84%
Excellent 59% … (Item F1)
Excellent or Very good 87% 97% 89% 97% 92% 79% 83% 74% 85%
Excellent 59% 81% 50% 78% 68% … (Item F1)
Excellent or Very good 93% 83% 82% 89%
Excellent 71% 50% 46% 65%
Very good 22% 33%
-
www.cahps.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/2019-pharmacy-sops-database-report-appendix.pdf
January 01, 2019 - or Very good 94% 86% 78%
Excellent 55% 54% 42%
Very good 40% 32% 36%
Good 5% 11% 16%
Fair 1% … In addition, “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotal shown due to rounding.
2019 … In addition, “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotal shown due to rounding.
2019 … or Very good 85% 84% 92% 78%
Excellent 49% 48% 53% 47%
Very good 36% 35% 39% 31%
Good 11% 12% … In addition, “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotal shown due to rounding.