-
psnet.ahrq.gov/node/33683/psn-pdf
April 01, 2009 - I
believe he was an excellent physician, and he was, in many ways, very wise. … Some care is truly excellent, but how much is
unknown. … shift the entire quality curve to the right and increase the height of the right-hand tail (more truly excellent … It is also less legitimate, and less practical, to use rule-making to lift care from acceptable to excellent … Increasing the amount of excellent care (right tail) requires organizations to exceed required quality
-
meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/rf42/rf42.pdf
June 01, 2019 - Health status
Nationally, “ever uninsured” rates for adults in good to excellent health declined from … lower in states that expanded Medicaid than in non-
expansion states for non-elderly adults in good to excellent … : “In general, compared to other people of (PERSON)’s age, would you say
that (PERSON)’s health is excellent … Individuals were classified as being in “excellent, very good, good” health if they
were reported to … be in excellent, very good, or good health in each of these three rounds.
-
ce.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/cahps/news-and-events/events/webinars/learning_pt_narratives_053123-evans.pdf
July 03, 2023 - of AI expanding
46
Perspectives from Leadership –
Team Well-Being
• Connects team to purpose
• Excellent
-
www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/nursing-home/2016/nhsurv16-pt2.pdf
January 01, 2016 - or Very Good 57% 64%
5 - Excellent 22% 28%
4 - Very Good 35% 36%
3 - Good 28% 24%
2 - Fair 12% … or Very Good 80% 72% 61% 59% 55% 53% 59%
5 - Excellent 40% 32% 23% 22% 22% 20% 24%
4 - Very Good … or Very Good 63% 58% 52%
5 - Excellent 27% 23% 20%
4 - Very Good 36% 35% 32%
3 - Good 25% 27% … or Very Good 65% 57% 57% 59% 65%
5 - Excellent 26% 23% 22% 25% 27%
4 - Very Good 39% 34% 35% 35% … In addition, “Excellent” and “Very Good” may not add to the total shown due to rounding.
-
ce.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/nursing-home/2016/nhsurv16-pt2.pdf
January 01, 2016 - or Very Good 57% 64%
5 - Excellent 22% 28%
4 - Very Good 35% 36%
3 - Good 28% 24%
2 - Fair 12% … or Very Good 80% 72% 61% 59% 55% 53% 59%
5 - Excellent 40% 32% 23% 22% 22% 20% 24%
4 - Very Good … or Very Good 63% 58% 52%
5 - Excellent 27% 23% 20%
4 - Very Good 36% 35% 32%
3 - Good 25% 27% … or Very Good 65% 57% 57% 59% 65%
5 - Excellent 26% 23% 22% 25% 27%
4 - Very Good 39% 34% 35% 35% … In addition, “Excellent” and “Very Good” may not add to the total shown due to rounding.
-
meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st392/stat392.pdf
November 01, 2012 - ● Those in bottom half of health care
spenders were more likely to report
excellent health status … Those who remained in the bottom
half of spenders were more likely to
be in excellent health, children … Individuals in excellent health were disproportionately represented among those
who remained in the … those individuals
remaining in the top decile of spenders, only 5.2 percent were reported to be in excellent … by medical expenditures in 2009 that shifted below the
top quartile in 2010 were predominantly in excellent
-
meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st481/stat481.pdf
September 01, 2015 - Those in the bottom half of
health care spenders both
years were more likely to
report excellent health … Those who remained
in the bottom half of spenders
were more likely to be in
excellent health, children … Individuals in excellent health were disproportionately represented among those who remained in the lower … those individuals remaining in the top decile of spenders, only
4.6 percent were reported to be in excellent … spenders
both years
Individuals in top decile,
2012 and lower 75%, 2013
Poor Fair Good Very good Excellent
-
meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st309/sb309.xml
December 01, 2010 - Those in bottom half of health care spenders were more likely to report excellent health status, while … Those who remained in the bottom half of spenders were more likely to be in excellent health, children … Individuals in excellent health were disproportionately represented among those who remained in the lower … those individuals remaining in the top decile of spenders, only 4.9 percent were reported to be in excellent … by medical expenditures in 2007 that shifted below the first quartile in 2008 were predominantly in excellent
-
meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st309/stat309.pdf
December 01, 2010 - ● Those in the bottom half of
health care spenders were more
likely to report excellent health … Those who
remained in the bottom half of
spenders were more likely to
be in excellent health, children … Individuals
in excellent health were disproportionately represented among those who remained in the … those individuals remaining in the top decile of spenders, only 4.9 percent were
reported to be in excellent … by medical
expenditures in 2007 that shifted below the first quartile in 2008 were predominantly in excellent
-
meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st354/draft/stat354.shtml
January 01, 2012 - Those in the bottom half of health care spenders were more likely to report excellent health status, … Those who remained in the bottom half of spenders were more likely to be in excellent health, children … Individuals in excellent health were disproportionately represented among those who remained in the lower … those individuals remaining in the top decile of spenders, only 6.1 percent were reported to be in excellent … by medical expenditures in 2008 that shifted below the first quartile in 2009 were predominantly in excellent
-
meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st354/stat354.pdf
January 01, 2012 - ● Those in the bottom half of
health care spenders were
more likely to report
excellent health … Individuals
in excellent health were disproportionately represented among those who remained in
the … those
individuals remaining in the top decile of spenders, only 6.1 percent were reported to be
in excellent … by medical expenditures in 2008 that shifted below the first quartile in 2009
were predominantly in excellent … : “In general, compared to other people
of (PERSON)’s age, would you say that (PERSON)’s health is excellent
-
meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st236/stat236.pdf
February 01, 2009 - Those in lower half of health
care spenders were more likely
to report excellent or very good
health … Those who remained in the
bottom half of spenders were
more likely to be in very good or
excellent … Individuals in excellent or very good health
were disproportionately represented among those who remained … those individuals remaining in the top
decile of spenders, only 6.0 percent were reported to be in excellent … : “In general, compared to other people of (PERSON)’s age, would you say that
(PERSON)’s health is excellent
-
meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st354/stat354.shtml
January 01, 2012 - Those in the bottom half of health care spenders were more likely to report excellent health status, … Those who remained in the bottom half of spenders were more likely to be in excellent health, children … Individuals in excellent health were disproportionately represented among those who remained in the lower … those individuals remaining in the top decile of spenders, only 6.1 percent were reported to be in excellent … by medical expenditures in 2008 that shifted below the first quartile in 2009 were predominantly in excellent
-
psnet.ahrq.gov/node/47787/psn-pdf
February 20, 2019 - interviews to understand the
characteristics that enabled a high-performing maternity ward to achieve their excellent
-
psnet.ahrq.gov/node/45696/psn-pdf
January 23, 2017 - The authors recommend focusing on both what went wrong and excellent performance to inform patient
safety
-
meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/rf00/tables/table6se.pdf
August 27, 2001 - 0.2 0.8
West † 1.16 6 20 758 1.5 1.3 0.2 0.7 0.4 0.7
Perceived health statuse
Under 65 years
Excellent … 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.3
Fair or Poor 620 1.27 8 33 239 3.0 2.9 0.2 1.0 0.7 0.9
65 years and over
Excellent
-
meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/rf_01-r036/tables/table7.pdf
August 27, 2001 - 1.9 1,911* 4,916 5,825 15.5 14.0* 44.8 17.8* 7.2* 0.8*
Perceived health statuse
Under 65 years
Excellent … Fair or Poor 18,876 6.0 1,491 4,164 4,721 12.0* 9.4* 21.4 51.8 4.1* 1.3*
65 years and over
Excellent
-
meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/rf_01-r036/tables/table6se.pdf
August 27, 2001 - 0.2 0.8
West † 1.16 6 20 758 1.5 1.3 0.2 0.7 0.4 0.7
Perceived health statuse
Under 65 years
Excellent … 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.3
Fair or Poor 620 1.27 8 33 239 3.0 2.9 0.2 1.0 0.7 0.9
65 years and over
Excellent
-
meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/rf00/tables/table7.pdf
August 27, 2001 - 1.9 1,911* 4,916 5,825 15.5 14.0* 44.8 17.8* 7.2* 0.8*
Perceived health statuse
Under 65 years
Excellent … Fair or Poor 18,876 6.0 1,491 4,164 4,721 12.0* 9.4* 21.4 51.8 4.1* 1.3*
65 years and over
Excellent
-
meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/rf00/tables/table7se.pdf
August 27, 2001 - 0.4
West † 0.19 574 572 862 4.2 5.3 6.2 6.0 2.3 0.5
Perceived health statuse
Under 65 years
Excellent … 12.1 3.9 0.4
Fair or Poor 620 0.55 412 461 684 6.1 2.9 5.2 7.4 2.1 0.6
65 years and over
Excellent