Results

Total Results: over 10,000 records

Showing results for "excellent".

  1. Psn-Pdf (pdf file)

    psnet.ahrq.gov/node/33683/psn-pdf
    April 01, 2009 - I believe he was an excellent physician, and he was, in many ways, very wise. … Some care is truly excellent, but how much is unknown. … shift the entire quality curve to the right and increase the height of the right-hand tail (more truly excellent … It is also less legitimate, and less practical, to use rule-making to lift care from acceptable to excellent … Increasing the amount of excellent care (right tail) requires organizations to exceed required quality
  2. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/rf42/rf42.pdf
    June 01, 2019 - Health status Nationally, “ever uninsured” rates for adults in good to excellent health declined from … lower in states that expanded Medicaid than in non- expansion states for non-elderly adults in good to excellent … : “In general, compared to other people of (PERSON)’s age, would you say that (PERSON)’s health is excellent … Individuals were classified as being in “excellent, very good, good” health if they were reported to … be in excellent, very good, or good health in each of these three rounds.
  3. ce.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/cahps/news-and-events/events/webinars/learning_pt_narratives_053123-evans.pdf
    July 03, 2023 - of AI expanding 46 Perspectives from Leadership – Team Well-Being • Connects team to purpose • Excellent
  4. www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/nursing-home/2016/nhsurv16-pt2.pdf
    January 01, 2016 - or Very Good 57% 64% 5 - Excellent 22% 28% 4 - Very Good 35% 36% 3 - Good 28% 24% 2 - Fair 12% … or Very Good 80% 72% 61% 59% 55% 53% 59% 5 - Excellent 40% 32% 23% 22% 22% 20% 24% 4 - Very Good … or Very Good 63% 58% 52% 5 - Excellent 27% 23% 20% 4 - Very Good 36% 35% 32% 3 - Good 25% 27% … or Very Good 65% 57% 57% 59% 65% 5 - Excellent 26% 23% 22% 25% 27% 4 - Very Good 39% 34% 35% 35% … In addition, “Excellent” and “Very Good” may not add to the total shown due to rounding.
  5. ce.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/nursing-home/2016/nhsurv16-pt2.pdf
    January 01, 2016 - or Very Good 57% 64% 5 - Excellent 22% 28% 4 - Very Good 35% 36% 3 - Good 28% 24% 2 - Fair 12% … or Very Good 80% 72% 61% 59% 55% 53% 59% 5 - Excellent 40% 32% 23% 22% 22% 20% 24% 4 - Very Good … or Very Good 63% 58% 52% 5 - Excellent 27% 23% 20% 4 - Very Good 36% 35% 32% 3 - Good 25% 27% … or Very Good 65% 57% 57% 59% 65% 5 - Excellent 26% 23% 22% 25% 27% 4 - Very Good 39% 34% 35% 35% … In addition, “Excellent” and “Very Good” may not add to the total shown due to rounding.
  6. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st392/stat392.pdf
    November 01, 2012 - ● Those in bottom half of health care spenders were more likely to report excellent health status … Those who remained in the bottom half of spenders were more likely to be in excellent health, children … Individuals in excellent health were disproportionately represented among those who remained in the … those individuals remaining in the top decile of spenders, only 5.2 percent were reported to be in excellent … by medical expenditures in 2009 that shifted below the top quartile in 2010 were predominantly in excellent
  7. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st481/stat481.pdf
    September 01, 2015 - Those in the bottom half of health care spenders both years were more likely to report excellent health … Those who remained in the bottom half of spenders were more likely to be in excellent health, children … Individuals in excellent health were disproportionately represented among those who remained in the lower … those individuals remaining in the top decile of spenders, only 4.6 percent were reported to be in excellent … spenders both years Individuals in top decile, 2012 and lower 75%, 2013 Poor Fair Good Very good Excellent
  8. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st309/sb309.xml
    December 01, 2010 - Those in bottom half of health care spenders were more likely to report excellent health status, while … Those who remained in the bottom half of spenders were more likely to be in excellent health, children … Individuals in excellent health were disproportionately represented among those who remained in the lower … those individuals remaining in the top decile of spenders, only 4.9 percent were reported to be in excellent … by medical expenditures in 2007 that shifted below the first quartile in 2008 were predominantly in excellent
  9. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st309/stat309.pdf
    December 01, 2010 - ● Those in the bottom half of health care spenders were more likely to report excellent health … Those who remained in the bottom half of spenders were more likely to be in excellent health, children … Individuals in excellent health were disproportionately represented among those who remained in the … those individuals remaining in the top decile of spenders, only 4.9 percent were reported to be in excellent … by medical expenditures in 2007 that shifted below the first quartile in 2008 were predominantly in excellent
  10. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st354/draft/stat354.shtml
    January 01, 2012 - Those in the bottom half of health care spenders were more likely to report excellent health status, … Those who remained in the bottom half of spenders were more likely to be in excellent health, children … Individuals in excellent health were disproportionately represented among those who remained in the lower … those individuals remaining in the top decile of spenders, only 6.1 percent were reported to be in excellent … by medical expenditures in 2008 that shifted below the first quartile in 2009 were predominantly in excellent
  11. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st354/stat354.pdf
    January 01, 2012 - ● Those in the bottom half of health care spenders were more likely to report excellent health … Individuals in excellent health were disproportionately represented among those who remained in the … those individuals remaining in the top decile of spenders, only 6.1 percent were reported to be in excellent … by medical expenditures in 2008 that shifted below the first quartile in 2009 were predominantly in excellent … : “In general, compared to other people of (PERSON)’s age, would you say that (PERSON)’s health is excellent
  12. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st236/stat236.pdf
    February 01, 2009 - Those in lower half of health care spenders were more likely to report excellent or very good health … Those who remained in the bottom half of spenders were more likely to be in very good or excellent … Individuals in excellent or very good health were disproportionately represented among those who remained … those individuals remaining in the top decile of spenders, only 6.0 percent were reported to be in excellent … : “In general, compared to other people of (PERSON)’s age, would you say that (PERSON)’s health is excellent
  13. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st354/stat354.shtml
    January 01, 2012 - Those in the bottom half of health care spenders were more likely to report excellent health status, … Those who remained in the bottom half of spenders were more likely to be in excellent health, children … Individuals in excellent health were disproportionately represented among those who remained in the lower … those individuals remaining in the top decile of spenders, only 6.1 percent were reported to be in excellent … by medical expenditures in 2008 that shifted below the first quartile in 2009 were predominantly in excellent
  14. Psn-Pdf (pdf file)

    psnet.ahrq.gov/node/47787/psn-pdf
    February 20, 2019 - interviews to understand the characteristics that enabled a high-performing maternity ward to achieve their excellent
  15. Psn-Pdf (pdf file)

    psnet.ahrq.gov/node/45696/psn-pdf
    January 23, 2017 - The authors recommend focusing on both what went wrong and excellent performance to inform patient safety
  16. Table6SE.PDF (pdf file)

    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/rf00/tables/table6se.pdf
    August 27, 2001 - 0.2 0.8 West † 1.16 6 20 758 1.5 1.3 0.2 0.7 0.4 0.7 Perceived health statuse Under 65 years Excellent … 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.3 Fair or Poor 620 1.27 8 33 239 3.0 2.9 0.2 1.0 0.7 0.9 65 years and over Excellent
  17. Table7.PDF (pdf file)

    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/rf_01-r036/tables/table7.pdf
    August 27, 2001 - 1.9 1,911* 4,916 5,825 15.5 14.0* 44.8 17.8* 7.2* 0.8* Perceived health statuse Under 65 years Excellent … Fair or Poor 18,876 6.0 1,491 4,164 4,721 12.0* 9.4* 21.4 51.8 4.1* 1.3* 65 years and over Excellent
  18. Table6SE.PDF (pdf file)

    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/rf_01-r036/tables/table6se.pdf
    August 27, 2001 - 0.2 0.8 West † 1.16 6 20 758 1.5 1.3 0.2 0.7 0.4 0.7 Perceived health statuse Under 65 years Excellent … 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.3 Fair or Poor 620 1.27 8 33 239 3.0 2.9 0.2 1.0 0.7 0.9 65 years and over Excellent
  19. Table7.PDF (pdf file)

    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/rf00/tables/table7.pdf
    August 27, 2001 - 1.9 1,911* 4,916 5,825 15.5 14.0* 44.8 17.8* 7.2* 0.8* Perceived health statuse Under 65 years Excellent … Fair or Poor 18,876 6.0 1,491 4,164 4,721 12.0* 9.4* 21.4 51.8 4.1* 1.3* 65 years and over Excellent
  20. Table7SE.PDF (pdf file)

    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/rf00/tables/table7se.pdf
    August 27, 2001 - 0.4 West † 0.19 574 572 862 4.2 5.3 6.2 6.0 2.3 0.5 Perceived health statuse Under 65 years Excellent … 12.1 3.9 0.4 Fair or Poor 620 0.55 412 461 684 6.1 2.9 5.2 7.4 2.1 0.6 65 years and over Excellent