-
ce.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/hospital/workplace-safety/2022-HSOPS-WPS-database-report-appendix-508.pdf
January 01, 2022 - In addition, percentages for “Excellent” and “Very Good”
may not add to subtotals for “Excellent or … (Item WPH1)
Excellent or Very Good 60% 43% 29%
Excellent 25% 16% 8%
Very Good 36% 26% 21% … In addition, percentages for “Excellent” and “Very Good”
may not add to subtotals for “Excellent or … (Item WPH1)
Excellent or Very Good 48% 63%
Excellent 17% 29%
Very Good 31% 35%
Good 33% 25% … In addition, percentages for “Excellent” and “Very Good”
may not add to subtotals for “Excellent or
-
meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st81/sb81.xml
May 01, 2005 - 5 and top 10 percent of the non-elderly in fair/poor health and for the top 10 percent of those in excellent … data not shown)
When self-reported health status is categorized into two groups, fair/poor and excellent … percent compared to 66 percent in 1996 (figure 5), while for the top 10 percent of the non-elderly in excellent … The top 5 percent of the non-elderly with excellent/very good/good health status also showed a significant … Concentration of health care expenditures in the U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population (age <65 years, excellent
-
meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st81/draft/stat81.shtml
May 01, 2005 - 5 and top 10 percent of the non-elderly in fair/poor health and for the top 10 percent of those in excellent … (data not shown)
When self-reported health status is categorized into two groups, fair/poor and excellent … percent compared to 66 percent in 1996 (figure 5), while for the top 10 percent of the non-elderly in excellent … The top 5 percent of the non-elderly with excellent/very good/good health status also showed a significant … Concentration of health care expenditures in the U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population (age <65 years, excellent
-
meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st81/stat81.pdf
May 01, 2005 - and top
10 percent of the non-elderly in
fair/poor health and for the top
10 percent of those in excellent … When self-reported health status is categorized into two groups, fair/poor and excellent/very good/good … percent compared to 66 percent in 1996 (figure 5), while for the top 10 percent of the non-elderly in
excellent … The top 5 percent of the non-elderly with excellent/very good/good health status
also showed a significant … noninstitutionalized population
Population ranked by expenditures
1996 and 2002
(age <65 years, excellent
-
meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st81/stat81.shtml
May 01, 2005 - 5 and top 10 percent of the non-elderly in fair/poor health and for the top 10 percent of those in excellent … (data not shown)
When self-reported health status is categorized into two groups, fair/poor and excellent … percent compared to 66 percent in 1996 (figure 5), while for the top 10 percent of the non-elderly in excellent … The top 5 percent of the non-elderly with excellent/very good/good health status also showed a significant … Concentration of health care expenditures in the U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population (age <65 years, excellent
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/celiac-disease/clinician
July 26, 2016 - Conclusions
Current evidence on the accuracy of tests used to diagnose celiac disease supports the excellent … Testing for the presence of HLA-DQ2 or HLA-DQ8 has excellent sensitivity and negative predictive … M)
95.0
99.0
NA
NA
HLA-DQ2 or HLA-DQ8
Other
2
100.0; 100.0
18.2; 33.3
NA
NA
Excellent … Systematic review
1
89.0 (82.0 to 94.0)
95.0 (89.0 to 99.0)
NA
Na
Very good sensitivity and excellent … Subpopulations
Patients with gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms : EmA and tTG tests have very good to excellent
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/celiac-disease_clinician.pdf
July 01, 2016 - Conclusions
Current evidence on the accuracy of tests used to diagnose
celiac disease supports the excellent … Testing for the presence of HLA-DQ2 or HLA-DQ8 has excellent
sensitivity and negative predictive value … Summary SOE
tTG IgA
Systematic
review
1 (M)
93.0
(91.2 to 94.5)
96.5
(95.2 to 97.5)
NA NA
Excellent … 86.0 to 96.9
Other 1 (M) 95.0 99.0 NA NA
HLA-DQ2 or
HLA-DQ8
Other 2 100.0; 100.0 18.2; 33.3 NA NA
Excellent … Systematic
review 1
89.0
(82.0 to 94.0)
95.0
(89.0 to 99.0)
NA NA
Very good sensitivity and
excellent
-
effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/celiac-disease_clinician.pdf
July 01, 2016 - Conclusions
Current evidence on the accuracy of tests used to diagnose
celiac disease supports the excellent … Testing for the presence of HLA-DQ2 or HLA-DQ8 has excellent
sensitivity and negative predictive value … Summary SOE
tTG IgA
Systematic
review
1 (M)
93.0
(91.2 to 94.5)
96.5
(95.2 to 97.5)
NA NA
Excellent … 86.0 to 96.9
Other 1 (M) 95.0 99.0 NA NA
HLA-DQ2 or
HLA-DQ8
Other 2 100.0; 100.0 18.2; 33.3 NA NA
Excellent … Systematic
review 1
89.0
(82.0 to 94.0)
95.0
(89.0 to 99.0)
NA NA
Very good sensitivity and
excellent
-
meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/cb8/cb8.shtml
November 01, 2001 - Health status
The majority of women in America were in excellent, very good, or good health … Overall, however, the majority of women of all racial/ethnic groups were in excellent, very good … Women's perceived health status: 1996
White
Black
Hispanic
Other
Excellent/very … Women in fair or poor health were more likely than women in excellent, very good, or good health … Women with more than 12 years of education were the most likely to be in excellent or very good
-
meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/rf37/rf37.shtml
August 01, 2017 - in fair or poor health were ever uninsured during 2013 compared to 29.3 percent of adults in good to excellent … In non-expansion states, however, rates only declined significantly for those in good to excellent health … By 2015, differences in rates between adults in fair or poor health and those in good to excellent health … Individuals were classified as being in "excellent, very good, good" health if they were reported to … be in excellent, very good or good health in each of these three rounds.
-
www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2020_MOSOPS_Part_I-rev0921.pdf
January 01, 2020 - (G1a)
Excellent/Very good 71% 20.55% 0% 44% 58% 73% 86% 100% 100%
2. … (G1b)
Excellent/Very good 71% 19.63% 0% 46% 60% 73% 86% 100% 100%
3. … (G1c)
Excellent/Very good 56% 24.52% 0% 25% 40% 56% 75% 88% 100%
4. … (G1d)
Excellent/Very good 62% 21.73% 0% 33% 50% 63% 78% 92% 100%
5. … (G1e)
Excellent/Very good 84% 15.02% 0% 63% 75% 86% 100% 100% 100%
6.
-
www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2020_MOSOPS_Part_I.pdf
January 01, 2020 - (G1a)
Excellent/Very good 71% 20.55% 0% 44% 58% 73% 86% 100% 100%
2. … (G1b)
Excellent/Very good 71% 19.63% 0% 46% 60% 73% 86% 100% 100%
3. … (G1c)
Excellent/Very good 56% 24.52% 0% 25% 40% 56% 75% 88% 100%
4. … (G1d)
Excellent/Very good 62% 21.73% 0% 33% 50% 63% 78% 92% 100%
5. … (G1e)
Excellent/Very good 84% 15.02% 0% 63% 75% 86% 100% 100% 100%
6.
-
meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/rf45/rf45.shtml
November 01, 2019 - Conversely, non-elderly adults in very good and excellent health comprised a little more than three-fifths … Together, elderly adults in very good and excellent health comprised almost half (47.7 percent) of the … Conversely, those in very good or excellent health comprised more than two-thirds (68.7 percent) of the … Among elderly adults in 2015–2016, those in excellent (344) and very good (422) mental health had the … Conversely, the share of total MMEs acquired by those in excellent (12.8 percent) and very good (16.0
-
www.ahrq.gov/talkingquality/distribute/promote/multiple/index.html
September 01, 2019 - That’s why it is important for your project team to include both people who are excellent at handling
-
www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/cahps/news-and-events/events/20150917/lee_hargraves-slides.pdf
September 28, 2015 - Differences in ratings of mental or emotional
health
Mental Health 6-Month* % (n)
12-Month
% (n)
Excellent … continued)
34.9
65.1
28.8
71.2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Fair or Poor Good to Excellent
-
www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/quality-resources/tools/literacy-toolkit/healthlittoolkit2-tool11c.docx
December 10, 2015 - ☐Excellent ☐ Very Good ☐Good ☐Fair ☐Poor
3.
-
www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/quality-resources/tools/cauti-ltc/modules/resources/tools/improve/teams-infographic.pdf
March 01, 2017 - Remember T.E.A.M.S. to Improve Safety Culture
T
E
A
M
S
Team
Formation
Excellent
Communication
-
psnet.ahrq.gov/node/837336/psn-pdf
June 08, 2022 - to the reference standard
(concordance determined by experts) the automated system performance was excellent
-
digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r21hs021781-kelchner-final-report-2014.pdf
January 01, 2014 - Participant Sync Video Quality Percent
Excellent 38
Good 62
Participant Sync Audio Quality Percent … Excellent 38
Good 62
Table 3. … Clinician Sync Video Quality Percent
Excellent 5
Good 63
Fair 24
Poor 2
Failed 5 … Excellent 50
Good 50
Table 9. … Clinician Recommend Telepractice Percent
Excellent 12.5
Good 87.5
Table10.
-
ce.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/hospital/2021-HSOPS2-Database-Report-Part-II-508.pdf
January 01, 2021 - (Item E1)
Excellent or Very Good 77% 75% 69% 69% 65% 66% 61%
Excellent 36% 34% 30% 31% 28% 27% 24% … In addition, percentages for “Excellent” and “Very Good” may not add to subtotals for “Excellent or Very … (Item E1)
Excellent or Very Good 67% 71% 71% 69%
Excellent 28% 32% 32% 30%
Very Good 39% 39% … (Item E1)
Excellent or Very Good 68% 69% 73% 75% 62% 64%
Excellent 29% 31% 34% 35% 25% 26% … (Item E1)
Excellent or Very Good 70% 63% 74% 75% 63% 82% 70% 71% 70% 66%
Excellent 27% 28% 33% 33%