-
www.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/officebasedcare/handouts/courseeval.html
December 01, 2015 - inadequate, did not meet, ineffective
2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective
3 = Excellent … than adequate, exceeded, very effective
TeamSTEPPS Fundamentals
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … 1
2
3
Comments:
Teaching and Coaching
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … 1
2
3
Comments:
Change Management
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent
To … 1
2
3
Comments:
Measurement
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent
To what
-
www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2024-medical-office-database-report-infographic.pdf
January 01, 2024 - Ratings on Quality
Highest Rated
Equitable 80%
of respondents reported that their medical office is
"Excellent … Lowest Rated
Timely 54%
of respondents reported that their medical office is
"Excellent" or "Very … of their medical office on patient safety
65%
of respondents
rated their
medical offices as
"Excellent … " or
"Very good"
Excellent
26%
Very good
38%
Good
27%
Fair
7%
Poor
1%
Note: Chart
-
psnet.ahrq.gov/node/35024/psn-pdf
March 04, 2011 - Excellent review scheme for critical incidents but
insufficient for revalidation. … Excellent review scheme for critical incidents but insufficient for revalidation. … https://psnet.ahrq.gov/issue/excellent-review-scheme-critical-incidents-insufficient-revalidation
The … https://psnet.ahrq.gov/issue/excellent-review-scheme-critical-incidents-insufficient-revalidation
https
-
www.ahrq.gov/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/medical-office/2014/mosurv14chap6.html
June 01, 2014 - Percent positive scores for all five Overall Ratings on Quality (those responding "Excellent" or "Very … only specialized in Pediatrics had the highest Overall Rating on Patient Safety (those responding "Excellent … had the highest percent positive scores for all five Overall Ratings on Quality (those responding "Excellent … had the highest percent positive scores for all five Overall Ratings on Quality (those responding "Excellent … had the highest percent positive scores for all five Overall Ratings on Quality (those responding "Excellent
-
www.ahrq.gov/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/nursing-home/2014/nhsurv14-apsumm.html
November 01, 2014 - highest percentage of respondents who gave their nursing home an overall rating on resident safety of "Excellent … and 71 percent, respectively) who gave their nursing home an overall rating on resident safety of "Excellent … percentage of respondents (63 percent) who gave their nursing home an overall rating on resident safety of "Excellent … highest percentage (63 percent) who gave their nursing home an overall rating on resident safety of "Excellent … highest percentage (66 percent) who gave their nursing home an overall rating on resident safety of "Excellent
-
www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/databases/medical-office/2016-report-part-2.pdf
January 01, 2016 - (G1b)
Excellent or Very Good 78% 73% 74% 70% 65% 66% 61%
5 - Excellent 43% 35% 35% 33% 28% … (G1e)
Excellent or Very Good 84% 79%
5 - Excellent 59% 51%
4 - Very Good 25% 28%
3 - Good … (G1a)
Excellent or Very Good 67% 76% 80% 73% 69% 71% 71% 82% 66%
5 - Excellent 34% 42% … (G1c)
Excellent or Very Good 52% 62% 62% 52% 48% 60% 52% 62% 55%
5 - Excellent 22% 31% … (G1d)
Excellent or Very Good 57% 67% 65% 62% 57% 64% 65% 73% 56%
5 - Excellent 24% 37%
-
psnet.ahrq.gov/issue/rn-assessments-excellent-quality-care-and-patient-safety-are-associated-significantly-lower
August 20, 2018 - Study
RN assessments of excellent quality of care and patient safety are associated … RN assessments of excellent quality of care and patient safety are associated with significantly lower … This study found that in hospitals where nurses rated quality of care as excellent, 30-day postsurgical … RN assessments of excellent quality of care and patient safety are associated with significantly lower
-
www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/instructor/reference/smpcefm.html
March 01, 2014 - inadequate, did not meet, ineffective
2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective
3 = Excellent … Comments:
Module 02: Team Structure - 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … inadequate, did not meet, ineffective
2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective
3 = Excellent … 1
2
3
Module 04: Leading Teams - 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … :
Module 05: Situation Monitoring - 45 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent
-
healthcare411.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/instructor/reference/smpcefm.html
March 01, 2014 - inadequate, did not meet, ineffective
2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective
3 = Excellent … Comments:
Module 02: Team Structure - 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … inadequate, did not meet, ineffective
2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective
3 = Excellent … 1
2
3
Module 04: Leading Teams - 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … :
Module 05: Situation Monitoring - 45 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent
-
monahrq.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/instructor/reference/smpcefm.html
March 01, 2014 - inadequate, did not meet, ineffective
2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective
3 = Excellent … Comments:
Module 02: Team Structure - 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … inadequate, did not meet, ineffective
2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective
3 = Excellent … 1
2
3
Module 04: Leading Teams - 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … :
Module 05: Situation Monitoring - 45 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent
-
cahps.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/instructor/reference/smpcefm.html
March 01, 2014 - inadequate, did not meet, ineffective
2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective
3 = Excellent … Comments:
Module 02: Team Structure - 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … inadequate, did not meet, ineffective
2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective
3 = Excellent … 1
2
3
Module 04: Leading Teams - 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … :
Module 05: Situation Monitoring - 45 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent
-
ce.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/instructor/reference/smpcefm.html
March 01, 2014 - inadequate, did not meet, ineffective
2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective
3 = Excellent …
Module 02: Team Structure - 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … inadequate, did not meet, ineffective
2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective
3 = Excellent … 3
Module 04: Leading Teams - 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … inadequate, did not meet, ineffective
2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective
3 = Excellent
-
www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/education/curriculum-tools/teamstepps/instructor/reference/smpcefm.docx
May 02, 2006 - did not meet, ineffective
Scale 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective
(Circle one) 3 = Excellent … exceeded, very effective
Module 0I: Introduction – 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 02: Team Structure – 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 04: Leading Teams – 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 06: Mutual Support – 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent
-
pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/education/curriculum-tools/teamstepps/instructor/reference/smpcefm.docx
May 02, 2006 - did not meet, ineffective
Scale 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective
(Circle one) 3 = Excellent … exceeded, very effective
Module 0I: Introduction – 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 02: Team Structure – 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 04: Leading Teams – 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 06: Mutual Support – 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent
-
pbrn.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/education/curriculum-tools/teamstepps/instructor/reference/smpcefm.docx
May 02, 2006 - did not meet, ineffective
Scale 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective
(Circle one) 3 = Excellent … exceeded, very effective
Module 0I: Introduction – 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 02: Team Structure – 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 04: Leading Teams – 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 06: Mutual Support – 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent
-
healthcare411.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/education/curriculum-tools/teamstepps/instructor/reference/smpcefm.docx
May 02, 2006 - did not meet, ineffective
Scale 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective
(Circle one) 3 = Excellent … exceeded, very effective
Module 0I: Introduction – 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 02: Team Structure – 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 04: Leading Teams – 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 06: Mutual Support – 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent
-
monahrq.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/education/curriculum-tools/teamstepps/instructor/reference/smpcefm.docx
May 02, 2006 - did not meet, ineffective
Scale 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective
(Circle one) 3 = Excellent … exceeded, very effective
Module 0I: Introduction – 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 02: Team Structure – 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 04: Leading Teams – 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 06: Mutual Support – 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent
-
cahps.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/education/curriculum-tools/teamstepps/instructor/reference/smpcefm.docx
May 02, 2006 - did not meet, ineffective
Scale 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective
(Circle one) 3 = Excellent … exceeded, very effective
Module 0I: Introduction – 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 02: Team Structure – 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 04: Leading Teams – 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 06: Mutual Support – 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent
-
ce.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/education/curriculum-tools/teamstepps/instructor/reference/smpcefm.docx
May 02, 2006 - did not meet, ineffective
Scale 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective
(Circle one) 3 = Excellent … exceeded, very effective
Module 0I: Introduction – 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 02: Team Structure – 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 04: Leading Teams – 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 06: Mutual Support – 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent
-
www.cpsi.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/teamstepps/longtermcare/sitetools/ts2-0ltc_sample_course_evalform.pdf
April 24, 2017 - Poor, inadequate, did not meet, ineffective
2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective
3 = Excellent … exceeded,
very effective
Module 01: Introduction – 50 minutes
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 02: Team Structure – 50 minutes
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … Poor, inadequate, did not meet, ineffective
2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective
3 = Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 04: Leading Teams – 50 minutes
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent