-
www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/instructor/reference/smpcefm.html
March 01, 2014 - inadequate, did not meet, ineffective
2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective
3 = Excellent … Comments:
Module 02: Team Structure - 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … inadequate, did not meet, ineffective
2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective
3 = Excellent … 1
2
3
Module 04: Leading Teams - 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … :
Module 05: Situation Monitoring - 45 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent
-
www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/education/curriculum-tools/teamstepps/instructor/reference/smpcefm.docx
May 02, 2006 - did not meet, ineffective
Scale 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective
(Circle one) 3 = Excellent … exceeded, very effective
Module 0I: Introduction – 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 02: Team Structure – 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 04: Leading Teams – 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 06: Mutual Support – 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent
-
www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2022-MOSOPS-Database-Report-Part-II-508.pdf
January 01, 2022 - (Item G1a)
Excellent or Very good 69% 78% 74% 69% 63% 61% 56%
5 - Excellent 35% 43% 36% 33% 28% 26% … (Item G2)
Excellent or Very good 64% 76% 71% 66% 57% 58% 51%
5 - Excellent 27% 35% 30% 27% 23% 20% … (Item G1a)
Excellent or Very good 71% 60%
5 - Excellent 36% 23%
4 - Very good 35% 37%
3 - Good … (Item G1b)
Excellent or Very good 73% 64%
5 - Excellent 36% 24%
4 - Very good 37% 40%
3 - Good … (Item G2)
Excellent or Very good 67% 56%
5 - Excellent 29% 18%
4 - Very good 38% 39%
3 - Good
-
www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2020_MOSOPS_Part_II_508.pdf
January 01, 2020 - (G1a)
Excellent or Very good 77% 76% 71% 71% 66% 65% 71%
5 - Excellent 42% 37% 37% 34% 30% 28% 32% … (G1b)
Excellent or Very good 75% 75% 71% 70% 67% 69% 75%
5 - Excellent 37% 34% 34% 32% 31% … (G1c)
Excellent or Very good 64% 63% 55% 56% 50% 49% 48%
5 - Excellent 29% 26% 24% 23% 19% 18% 17% … (G1d)
Excellent or Very good 70% 69% 64% 61% 57% 56% 56%
5 - Excellent 36% 28% 28% 25% 21% 22% 20% … (G2)
Excellent or Very good 75% 73% 69% 68% 62% 61% 65%
5 - Excellent 38% 32% 31% 28% 25% 23% 25%
-
www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/hospital/MOSOPS-2022-Overview-Infographic-508.pdf
January 01, 2022 - Ratings on Quality
Highest Rated
Equitable 83%
of respondents reported that their medical office is
"Excellent … Lowest Rated
Timely 57%
of respondents reported that their medical office is
"Excellent" or "Very … office on patient safety
65%
of respondents gave their medical
office a patient safety rating of
"Excellent … Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Note: Chart totals may not add to 100% due to rounding. … The % "Excellent" or "Very Good" is based on unrounded numbers.
What's Next?
-
www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/2018mosopsdatabasereport-part2.pdf
April 01, 2018 - (G1a)
Excellent or Very Good 76% 78% 73% 70% 69% 68% 65%
5 - Excellent 41% 42% 37% 34% 32% 30% 29% … (G1b)
Excellent or Very Good 76% 75% 71% 71% 69% 68% 67%
5 - Excellent 37% 39% 35% 33% 31% 29% 31% … (G1d)
Excellent or Very Good 67% 69% 63% 60% 58% 54% 48%
5 - Excellent 32% 32% 27% 26% 22% 20% 16% … (G1a)
Excellent or Very Good 73% 69%
5 - Excellent 38% 31%
4 - Very Good 35% 38%
3 - Good 22% … (G1b)
Excellent or Very Good 73% 68%
5 - Excellent 36% 29%
4 - Very Good 37% 40%
3 - Good 23%
-
www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/teamstepps-program/tools/ts-course-evaluation-form.pdf
June 01, 2023 - Poor, inadequate, did not meet,
ineffective
2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory,
effective
3 = Excellent … , more than adequate,
exceeded, very effective
Introduction
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 1: Communication
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
To what extent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 3
Module 2: Team Leadership
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 4
Module 4: Mutual Support
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
-
www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2024-medical-office-database-report-appendix.pdf
January 01, 2024 - (Item G1D)
Excellent or Very good 57% 66% 61% 58% 54% 51%
Excellent 28% 26% 25% 23% 20% 16% … (Item G1E)
Excellent or Very good 82% 83% 82% 80% 78% 75%
Excellent 56% 55% 53% 53% 47% 42% … (Item G2)
Excellent or Very good 66% 59%
Excellent 27% 22%
Very good 38% 37%
Good 26% 31% … (Item G1D)
Excellent or Very good 59% 61% 57% 53%
Excellent 23% 23% 19% 18%
Very good 36% 38% … (Item G2)
Excellent or Very good 64% 65% 69% 66%
Excellent 24% 22% 27% 28%
Very good 40%
-
www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/education/curriculum-tools/teamstepps/officebasedcare/handouts/courseeval.pdf
December 02, 2015 - did not meet, ineffective
Scale 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective
(Circle one) 3 = Excellent … than adequate, exceeded,
very effective
TeamSTEPPS Fundamentals
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … .......... 1 2 3
Comments:
Summary: Putting It All Together
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … did not meet, ineffective
Scale 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective
(Circle one) 3 = Excellent … , more than adequate, exceeded,
very effective
Measurement
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
-
www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/hospitalvaluepilotreport.pdf
November 01, 2017 - Excellent or Very Good 68% 68% 66%
Excellent 33% 31% 29%
Very Good 35% 37% 37%
Good 26% 25% 27% … Excellent or Very Good 64% 64% 66%
Excellent 26% 26% 29%
Very Good 38% 38% 37%
Good 28% 27% 26% … In addition, the percentages for Excellent and Very Good may not add to the
subtotal for “Excellent … Excellent or Very Good 57% 58% 58%
Excellent 24% 22% 22%
Very Good 34% 35% 36%
Good 30% 29% 30% … Excellent or Very Good 51% 53% 52%
Excellent 21% 20% 20%
Very Good 30% 34% 32%
Good 32% 31% 31%
-
www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/hospvaluepilotreport.pdf
November 01, 2017 - Excellent or Very Good 68% 68% 66%
Excellent 33% 31% 29%
Very Good 35% 37% 37%
Good 26% 25% 27% … Excellent or Very Good 64% 64% 66%
Excellent 26% 26% 29%
Very Good 38% 38% 37%
Good 28% 27% 26% … In addition, the percentages for Excellent and Very Good may not add to the
subtotal for “Excellent … Excellent or Very Good 57% 58% 58%
Excellent 24% 22% 22%
Very Good 34% 35% 36%
Good 30% 29% 30% … Excellent or Very Good 51% 53% 52%
Excellent 21% 20% 20%
Very Good 30% 34% 32%
Good 32% 31% 31%
-
www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2024-medical-office-database-report-infographic.pdf
January 01, 2024 - Ratings on Quality
Highest Rated
Equitable 80%
of respondents reported that their medical office is
"Excellent … Lowest Rated
Timely 54%
of respondents reported that their medical office is
"Excellent" or "Very … of their medical office on patient safety
65%
of respondents
rated their
medical offices as
"Excellent … " or
"Very good"
Excellent
26%
Very good
38%
Good
27%
Fair
7%
Poor
1%
Note: Chart
-
www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/medical-office/2016/mosurvey2016pt2.pdf
January 01, 2016 - (G1b)
Excellent or Very Good 78% 73% 74% 70% 65% 66% 61%
5 - Excellent 43% 35% 35% 33% 28% … (G1e)
Excellent or Very Good 84% 79%
5 - Excellent 59% 51%
4 - Very Good 25% 28%
3 - Good … (G1a)
Excellent or Very Good 67% 76% 80% 73% 69% 71% 71% 82% 66%
5 - Excellent 34% 42% … (G1c)
Excellent or Very Good 52% 62% 62% 52% 48% 60% 52% 62% 55%
5 - Excellent 22% 31% … (G1d)
Excellent or Very Good 57% 67% 65% 62% 57% 64% 65% 73% 56%
5 - Excellent 24% 37%
-
www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/officebasedcare/handouts/courseeval.html
December 01, 2015 - inadequate, did not meet, ineffective
2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective
3 = Excellent … 1
2
3
Comments:
Teaching and Coaching
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … 1
2
3
Comments:
Change Management
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent
To … 1
2
3
Comments:
Measurement
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent
To what … 1
2
3
Comments:
Implementation Planning
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent
-
www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2020_MOSOPS_Infographic.pdf
January 01, 2020 - Highest
Rated Equitable
84%
of respondents reported that their medical office is
"excellent" or … Lowest
Rated Timely
56%
of respondents reported that their medical office is
"excellent" or "very … Patient Safety Rating
Average respondent ratings of their medical office on patient safety
29%
Excellent
-
www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/2019-nhsops-dbreport-partii.pdf
January 01, 2019 - In addition, percentages for “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotals for “Excellent … In addition, percentages for “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotals for “Excellent … In addition, percentages for “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotals for “Excellent … In addition, percentages for “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotals for “Excellent … In addition, percentages for “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotals for “Excellent
-
www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/asc/2023-ASC-Database-Report-Exec-Summary-Infographic.pdf
January 01, 2023 - positive
response
(lowest)
Overall Patient Safety Rating
85%
of respondents
rated their ASC as
"Excellent … " or "Very good"
54%
Excellent
31%
Very
good
11%
Good
3%
Fair
1%
Poor
Note: Chart
-
www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/pqmp/measures/outcomes/chipra-81-pgh-7-section-2-tech-specs.pdf
January 01, 2012 - REPORT ITEM RESPON SE
CATEGORIES
SOURCE
Global01 In general, would you say your
health is:
Excellent … Poor
PROMIS –
Adult Global
Health
Global02 In general, would you say your
quality of life is:
Excellent … Excellent - Very
good – Good – Fair -
Poor
PROMIS –
Adult Global
Health
Global04 In general, … Excellent - Very
good – Good – Fair -
Poor
PROMIS –
Adult Global
Health
Ped Global2 How often
-
www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/nursing-home/2023-SOPS-Nursing-Home-DB-Infographic.pdf
January 01, 2023 - 8%
No
Overall Rating on Resident Safety
54%
of respondents
rated their nursing
home
“Excellent … ” or
“Very Good”
21%
Excellent
33%
Very
Good
28%
Good
15%
Fair
3%
Poor
Note
-
www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/asc/asc_2020_overview_infographic-v2.pdf
January 01, 2020 - Overall Patient Safety Rating
86%
of respondents
rated their ASC
"Excellent" or
"Very good"
53% … Excellent
33%
Very good
11%
Good
3%
Fair
0%
Poor
What's Next?