Results

Total Results: 1,069 records

Showing results for "excellent".

  1. www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/instructor/reference/smpcefm.html
    March 01, 2014 - inadequate, did not meet, ineffective 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective 3 = Excellent … Comments:     Module 02: Team Structure - 50 minutes   Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … inadequate, did not meet, ineffective 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective 3 = Excellent … 1 2 3 Module 04: Leading Teams - 50 minutes   Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … :     Module 05: Situation Monitoring - 45 minutes   Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
  2. TeamSTEPPS2.0_final (doc file)

    www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/education/curriculum-tools/teamstepps/instructor/reference/smpcefm.docx
    May 02, 2006 - did not meet, ineffective Scale 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective (Circle one) 3 = Excellent … exceeded, very effective Module 0I: Introduction – 50 minutes Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3 Comments: Module 02: Team Structure – 50 minutes Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3 Comments: Module 04: Leading Teams – 50 minutes Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3 Comments: Module 06: Mutual Support – 50 minutes Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
  3. www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2022-MOSOPS-Database-Report-Part-II-508.pdf
    January 01, 2022 - (Item G1a) Excellent or Very good 69% 78% 74% 69% 63% 61% 56% 5 - Excellent 35% 43% 36% 33% 28% 26% … (Item G2) Excellent or Very good 64% 76% 71% 66% 57% 58% 51% 5 - Excellent 27% 35% 30% 27% 23% 20% … (Item G1a) Excellent or Very good 71% 60% 5 - Excellent 36% 23% 4 - Very good 35% 37% 3 - Good … (Item G1b) Excellent or Very good 73% 64% 5 - Excellent 36% 24% 4 - Very good 37% 40% 3 - Good … (Item G2) Excellent or Very good 67% 56% 5 - Excellent 29% 18% 4 - Very good 38% 39% 3 - Good
  4. www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2020_MOSOPS_Part_II_508.pdf
    January 01, 2020 - (G1a) Excellent or Very good 77% 76% 71% 71% 66% 65% 71% 5 - Excellent 42% 37% 37% 34% 30% 28% 32% … (G1b) Excellent or Very good 75% 75% 71% 70% 67% 69% 75% 5 - Excellent 37% 34% 34% 32% 31% … (G1c) Excellent or Very good 64% 63% 55% 56% 50% 49% 48% 5 - Excellent 29% 26% 24% 23% 19% 18% 17% … (G1d) Excellent or Very good 70% 69% 64% 61% 57% 56% 56% 5 - Excellent 36% 28% 28% 25% 21% 22% 20% … (G2) Excellent or Very good 75% 73% 69% 68% 62% 61% 65% 5 - Excellent 38% 32% 31% 28% 25% 23% 25%
  5. www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/hospital/MOSOPS-2022-Overview-Infographic-508.pdf
    January 01, 2022 - Ratings on Quality Highest Rated Equitable 83% of respondents reported that their medical office is "Excellent … Lowest Rated Timely 57% of respondents reported that their medical office is "Excellent" or "Very … office on patient safety 65% of respondents gave their medical office a patient safety rating of "ExcellentExcellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Note: Chart totals may not add to 100% due to rounding. … The % "Excellent" or "Very Good" is based on unrounded numbers. What's Next?
  6. www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/2018mosopsdatabasereport-part2.pdf
    April 01, 2018 - (G1a) Excellent or Very Good 76% 78% 73% 70% 69% 68% 65% 5 - Excellent 41% 42% 37% 34% 32% 30% 29% … (G1b) Excellent or Very Good 76% 75% 71% 71% 69% 68% 67% 5 - Excellent 37% 39% 35% 33% 31% 29% 31% … (G1d) Excellent or Very Good 67% 69% 63% 60% 58% 54% 48% 5 - Excellent 32% 32% 27% 26% 22% 20% 16% … (G1a) Excellent or Very Good 73% 69% 5 - Excellent 38% 31% 4 - Very Good 35% 38% 3 - Good 22% … (G1b) Excellent or Very Good 73% 68% 5 - Excellent 36% 29% 4 - Very Good 37% 40% 3 - Good 23%
  7. www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/teamstepps-program/tools/ts-course-evaluation-form.pdf
    June 01, 2023 - Poor, inadequate, did not meet, ineffective 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective 3 = Excellent … , more than adequate, exceeded, very effective Introduction Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3 Comments: Module 1: Communication Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent To what extent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 3 Module 2: Team Leadership Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 4 Module 4: Mutual Support Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
  8. www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2024-medical-office-database-report-appendix.pdf
    January 01, 2024 - (Item G1D) Excellent or Very good 57% 66% 61% 58% 54% 51% Excellent 28% 26% 25% 23% 20% 16% … (Item G1E) Excellent or Very good 82% 83% 82% 80% 78% 75% Excellent 56% 55% 53% 53% 47% 42% … (Item G2) Excellent or Very good 66% 59% Excellent 27% 22% Very good 38% 37% Good 26% 31% … (Item G1D) Excellent or Very good 59% 61% 57% 53% Excellent 23% 23% 19% 18% Very good 36% 38% … (Item G2) Excellent or Very good 64% 65% 69% 66% Excellent 24% 22% 27% 28% Very good 40%
  9. www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/education/curriculum-tools/teamstepps/officebasedcare/handouts/courseeval.pdf
    December 02, 2015 - did not meet, ineffective Scale 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective (Circle one) 3 = Excellent … than adequate, exceeded, very effective TeamSTEPPS Fundamentals Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … .......... 1 2 3 Comments: Summary: Putting It All Together Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … did not meet, ineffective Scale 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective (Circle one) 3 = Excellent … , more than adequate, exceeded, very effective Measurement Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
  10. www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/hospitalvaluepilotreport.pdf
    November 01, 2017 - Excellent or Very Good 68% 68% 66% Excellent 33% 31% 29% Very Good 35% 37% 37% Good 26% 25% 27% … Excellent or Very Good 64% 64% 66% Excellent 26% 26% 29% Very Good 38% 38% 37% Good 28% 27% 26% … In addition, the percentages for Excellent and Very Good may not add to the subtotal for “ExcellentExcellent or Very Good 57% 58% 58% Excellent 24% 22% 22% Very Good 34% 35% 36% Good 30% 29% 30% … Excellent or Very Good 51% 53% 52% Excellent 21% 20% 20% Very Good 30% 34% 32% Good 32% 31% 31%
  11. www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/hospvaluepilotreport.pdf
    November 01, 2017 - Excellent or Very Good 68% 68% 66% Excellent 33% 31% 29% Very Good 35% 37% 37% Good 26% 25% 27% … Excellent or Very Good 64% 64% 66% Excellent 26% 26% 29% Very Good 38% 38% 37% Good 28% 27% 26% … In addition, the percentages for Excellent and Very Good may not add to the subtotal for “ExcellentExcellent or Very Good 57% 58% 58% Excellent 24% 22% 22% Very Good 34% 35% 36% Good 30% 29% 30% … Excellent or Very Good 51% 53% 52% Excellent 21% 20% 20% Very Good 30% 34% 32% Good 32% 31% 31%
  12. www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2024-medical-office-database-report-infographic.pdf
    January 01, 2024 - Ratings on Quality Highest Rated Equitable 80% of respondents reported that their medical office is "Excellent … Lowest Rated Timely 54% of respondents reported that their medical office is "Excellent" or "Very … of their medical office on patient safety 65% of respondents rated their medical offices as "Excellent … " or "Very good" Excellent 26% Very good 38% Good 27% Fair 7% Poor 1% Note: Chart
  13. www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/medical-office/2016/mosurvey2016pt2.pdf
    January 01, 2016 - (G1b) Excellent or Very Good 78% 73% 74% 70% 65% 66% 61% 5 - Excellent 43% 35% 35% 33% 28% … (G1e) Excellent or Very Good 84% 79% 5 - Excellent 59% 51% 4 - Very Good 25% 28% 3 - Good … (G1a) Excellent or Very Good 67% 76% 80% 73% 69% 71% 71% 82% 66% 5 - Excellent 34% 42% … (G1c) Excellent or Very Good 52% 62% 62% 52% 48% 60% 52% 62% 55% 5 - Excellent 22% 31% … (G1d) Excellent or Very Good 57% 67% 65% 62% 57% 64% 65% 73% 56% 5 - Excellent 24% 37%
  14. www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/officebasedcare/handouts/courseeval.html
    December 01, 2015 - inadequate, did not meet, ineffective 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective 3 = Excellent … 1 2 3 Comments:     Teaching and Coaching Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3 Comments:     Change Management Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent To … 1 2 3 Comments:     Measurement Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent To what … 1 2 3 Comments:     Implementation Planning Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
  15. www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2020_MOSOPS_Infographic.pdf
    January 01, 2020 - Highest Rated Equitable 84% of respondents reported that their medical office is "excellent" or … Lowest Rated Timely 56% of respondents reported that their medical office is "excellent" or "very … Patient Safety Rating Average respondent ratings of their medical office on patient safety 29% Excellent
  16. www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/2019-nhsops-dbreport-partii.pdf
    January 01, 2019 - In addition, percentages for “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotals for “Excellent … In addition, percentages for “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotals for “Excellent … In addition, percentages for “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotals for “Excellent … In addition, percentages for “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotals for “Excellent … In addition, percentages for “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotals for “Excellent
  17. www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/asc/2023-ASC-Database-Report-Exec-Summary-Infographic.pdf
    January 01, 2023 - positive response (lowest) Overall Patient Safety Rating 85% of respondents rated their ASC as "Excellent … " or "Very good" 54% Excellent 31% Very good 11% Good 3% Fair 1% Poor Note: Chart
  18. www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/pqmp/measures/outcomes/chipra-81-pgh-7-section-2-tech-specs.pdf
    January 01, 2012 - REPORT ITEM RESPON SE CATEGORIES SOURCE Global01 In general, would you say your health is: Excellent … Poor PROMIS – Adult Global Health Global02 In general, would you say your quality of life is: ExcellentExcellent - Very good – Good – Fair - Poor PROMIS – Adult Global Health Global04 In general, … Excellent - Very good – Good – Fair - Poor PROMIS – Adult Global Health Ped Global2 How often
  19. www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/nursing-home/2023-SOPS-Nursing-Home-DB-Infographic.pdf
    January 01, 2023 - 8% No Overall Rating on Resident Safety 54% of respondents rated their nursing home “Excellent … ” or “Very Good” 21% Excellent 33% Very Good 28% Good 15% Fair 3% Poor Note
  20. www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/asc/asc_2020_overview_infographic-v2.pdf
    January 01, 2020 - Overall Patient Safety Rating 86% of respondents rated their ASC "Excellent" or "Very good" 53% … Excellent 33% Very good 11% Good 3% Fair 0% Poor What's Next?

Search the AHRQ Archive

Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.

Search Archive

Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site

You selected to view results for the following site: