Results

Total Results: 512 records

Showing results for "excellent".

  1. pcmh.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/instructor/reference/smpcefm.html
    March 01, 2014 - inadequate, did not meet, ineffective 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective 3 = Excellent … exceeded, very effective Module 01: Introduction - 50 minutes   Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … Comments:     Module 02: Team Structure - 50 minutes   Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … inadequate, did not meet, ineffective 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective 3 = Excellent … 1 2 3 Module 04: Leading Teams - 50 minutes   Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
  2. TeamSTEPPS2.0_final (doc file)

    pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/education/curriculum-tools/teamstepps/instructor/reference/smpcefm.docx
    May 02, 2006 - did not meet, ineffective Scale 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective (Circle one) 3 = Excellent … exceeded, very effective Module 0I: Introduction – 50 minutes Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3 Comments: Module 02: Team Structure – 50 minutes Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3 Comments: Module 04: Leading Teams – 50 minutes Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3 Comments: Module 06: Mutual Support – 50 minutes Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
  3. pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2022-MOSOPS-Database-Report-Part-II-508.pdf
    January 01, 2022 - (Item G1a) Excellent or Very good 69% 78% 74% 69% 63% 61% 56% 5 - Excellent 35% 43% 36% 33% 28% 26% … (Item G2) Excellent or Very good 64% 76% 71% 66% 57% 58% 51% 5 - Excellent 27% 35% 30% 27% 23% 20% … (Item G1a) Excellent or Very good 71% 60% 5 - Excellent 36% 23% 4 - Very good 35% 37% 3 - Good … (Item G1b) Excellent or Very good 73% 64% 5 - Excellent 36% 24% 4 - Very good 37% 40% 3 - Good … (Item G2) Excellent or Very good 67% 56% 5 - Excellent 29% 18% 4 - Very good 38% 39% 3 - Good
  4. pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2020_MOSOPS_Part_II_508.pdf
    January 01, 2020 - (G1a) Excellent or Very good 77% 76% 71% 71% 66% 65% 71% 5 - Excellent 42% 37% 37% 34% 30% 28% 32% … (G1b) Excellent or Very good 75% 75% 71% 70% 67% 69% 75% 5 - Excellent 37% 34% 34% 32% 31% … (G1c) Excellent or Very good 64% 63% 55% 56% 50% 49% 48% 5 - Excellent 29% 26% 24% 23% 19% 18% 17% … (G1d) Excellent or Very good 70% 69% 64% 61% 57% 56% 56% 5 - Excellent 36% 28% 28% 25% 21% 22% 20% … (G2) Excellent or Very good 75% 73% 69% 68% 62% 61% 65% 5 - Excellent 38% 32% 31% 28% 25% 23% 25%
  5. pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/hospital/MOSOPS-2022-Overview-Infographic-508.pdf
    January 01, 2022 - Ratings on Quality Highest Rated Equitable 83% of respondents reported that their medical office is "Excellent … Lowest Rated Timely 57% of respondents reported that their medical office is "Excellent" or "Very … office on patient safety 65% of respondents gave their medical office a patient safety rating of "ExcellentExcellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Note: Chart totals may not add to 100% due to rounding. … The % "Excellent" or "Very Good" is based on unrounded numbers. What's Next?
  6. pcmh.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/officebasedcare/handouts/courseeval.html
    December 01, 2015 - inadequate, did not meet, ineffective 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective 3 = Excellent … 1 2 3 Comments:     Teaching and Coaching Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3 Comments:     Change Management Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent To … 1 2 3 Comments:     Measurement Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent To what … 1 2 3 Comments:     Implementation Planning Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
  7. pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/2018mosopsdatabasereport-part2.pdf
    April 01, 2018 - (G1a) Excellent or Very Good 76% 78% 73% 70% 69% 68% 65% 5 - Excellent 41% 42% 37% 34% 32% 30% 29% … (G1b) Excellent or Very Good 76% 75% 71% 71% 69% 68% 67% 5 - Excellent 37% 39% 35% 33% 31% 29% 31% … (G1d) Excellent or Very Good 67% 69% 63% 60% 58% 54% 48% 5 - Excellent 32% 32% 27% 26% 22% 20% 16% … (G1a) Excellent or Very Good 73% 69% 5 - Excellent 38% 31% 4 - Very Good 35% 38% 3 - Good 22% … (G1b) Excellent or Very Good 73% 68% 5 - Excellent 36% 29% 4 - Very Good 37% 40% 3 - Good 23%
  8. pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/education/curriculum-tools/teamstepps/officebasedcare/handouts/courseeval.pdf
    December 02, 2015 - did not meet, ineffective Scale 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective (Circle one) 3 = Excellent … than adequate, exceeded, very effective TeamSTEPPS Fundamentals Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … .......... 1 2 3 Comments: Summary: Putting It All Together Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … did not meet, ineffective Scale 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective (Circle one) 3 = Excellent … , more than adequate, exceeded, very effective Measurement Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
  9. pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/hospitalvaluepilotreport.pdf
    November 01, 2017 - Excellent or Very Good 68% 68% 66% Excellent 33% 31% 29% Very Good 35% 37% 37% Good 26% 25% 27% … Excellent or Very Good 64% 64% 66% Excellent 26% 26% 29% Very Good 38% 38% 37% Good 28% 27% 26% … In addition, the percentages for Excellent and Very Good may not add to the subtotal for “ExcellentExcellent or Very Good 57% 58% 58% Excellent 24% 22% 22% Very Good 34% 35% 36% Good 30% 29% 30% … Excellent or Very Good 51% 53% 52% Excellent 21% 20% 20% Very Good 30% 34% 32% Good 32% 31% 31%
  10. pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/medical-office/2016/mosurvey2016pt2.pdf
    January 01, 2016 - (G1b) Excellent or Very Good 78% 73% 74% 70% 65% 66% 61% 5 - Excellent 43% 35% 35% 33% 28% … (G1e) Excellent or Very Good 84% 79% 5 - Excellent 59% 51% 4 - Very Good 25% 28% 3 - Good … (G1a) Excellent or Very Good 67% 76% 80% 73% 69% 71% 71% 82% 66% 5 - Excellent 34% 42% … (G1c) Excellent or Very Good 52% 62% 62% 52% 48% 60% 52% 62% 55% 5 - Excellent 22% 31% … (G1d) Excellent or Very Good 57% 67% 65% 62% 57% 64% 65% 73% 56% 5 - Excellent 24% 37%
  11. pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2020_MOSOPS_Infographic.pdf
    January 01, 2020 - Highest Rated Equitable 84% of respondents reported that their medical office is "excellent" or … Lowest Rated Timely 56% of respondents reported that their medical office is "excellent" or "very … Patient Safety Rating Average respondent ratings of their medical office on patient safety 29% Excellent
  12. pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/nursing-home/2023-SOPS-Nursing-Home-DB-Infographic.pdf
    January 01, 2023 - 8% No Overall Rating on Resident Safety 54% of respondents rated their nursing home “Excellent … ” or “Very Good” 21% Excellent 33% Very Good 28% Good 15% Fair 3% Poor Note
  13. pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/medical-office/2016/mosurvey2016pt1.pdf
    January 01, 2016 - (G1A) Excellent/Very Good 71% 22.87% 0% 40% 57% 71% 89% 100% 100% 2. … (G1B) Excellent/Very Good 70% 22.07% 0% 40% 57% 71% 87% 100% 100% 3. … (G1C) Excellent/Very Good 56% 26.72% 0% 20% 38% 56% 75% 100% 100% 4. … (G1D) Excellent/Very Good 62% 24.24% 0% 30% 45% 62% 80% 100% 100% 5. … (G1E) Excellent/Very Good 83% 16.36% 0% 61% 74% 85% 100% 100% 100% 6.
  14. pcmh.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/simulation/index.html
    June 01, 2019 - It affords excellent opportunities to enhance the quality of continuing education for health care professionals
  15. pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/nursing-home/2023-SOPS-Nursing-Home-DB-Part-II.pdf
    January 01, 2023 - (Item E2) Excellent or Very Good 61% 50% Excellent 25% 18% Very Good 36% 32% Good 27% 29% Fair … (Item E2) Excellent or Very Good 45% 58% Excellent 13% 24% Very Good 32% 34% Good 31% 27% Fair … (Item E2) Excellent or Very Good 72% 63% 57% 52% 50% 48% 53% Excellent 33% 29% 22% 14% 19% 27% 22% … (Item E2) Excellent or Very Good 51% 55% 54% 54% Excellent 14% 22% 19% 20% Very Good 37% 33% 35% … (Item E2) Excellent or Very Good 57% 51% 51% Excellent 22% 22% 19% Very Good 34% 29% 32% Good
  16. pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/cahps/surveys-guidance/nh/nursing-home-long-stay-eng-651a.doc
    March 09, 2007 - 1( OFTEN 2( SOMETIMES 3( RARELY 4( NEVER [HAND R SHOWCARD 5: EXCELLENT/VERY GOOD/GOOD/FAIR/POOR] … In general, how would you rate your overall health – excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor? … 1( EXCELLENT 2( VERY GOOD 3( GOOD 4( FAIR 5( POOR [HAND R SHOWCARD 6: 0-10] These next questions … Probably No Probably Yes Definitely Yes Showcard #3 Often Sometimes Rarely Never Showcard #4 Excellent
  17. pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2022-mosops-database-report-part-I.pdf
    January 01, 2022 - Lowest Rated Timely 57% of respondents reported that their medical office is "Excellent" or "Very … Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Note: Chart totals may not add to 100% due to rounding. … The% "Excellent" or "Very Good" is based on unrounded numbers. What's Next? … Effective Is based on scientific knowledge. 71% Positive Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor … ” (Poor, Fair, Good, Very good, Excellent).
  18. pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/2019-pharmacy-sops-database-report-appendix.pdf
    January 01, 2019 - or Very good 94% 86% 78% Excellent 55% 54% 42% Very good 40% 32% 36% Good 5% 11% 16% Fair 1% … In addition, “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotal shown due to rounding. 2019 … In addition, “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotal shown due to rounding. 2019 … or Very good 85% 84% 92% 78% Excellent 49% 48% 53% 47% Very good 36% 35% 39% 31% Good 11% 12% … In addition, “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotal shown due to rounding.
  19. pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/asc/2023-ASC-Database-Report-II.pdf
    January 01, 2023 - o Average percentage of respondents who gave their ASC a Patient Safety Rating of “Excellent” or “Very … (Item F1) Excellent or Very good 89% 87% 86% 85% 83% Excellent 56% 58% 57% 55% 49% Very good … (Item F1) Excellent or Very good 88% 87% 84% 84% 87% 87% 88% 81% 84% Excellent 59% … (Item F1) Excellent or Very good 87% 97% 89% 97% 92% 79% 83% 74% 85% Excellent 59% 81% 50% 78% 68% … (Item F1) Excellent or Very good 93% 83% 82% 89% Excellent 71% 50% 46% 65% Very good 22% 33%
  20. pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/nursing-home/NH-WPS-Pilot-Study-Overall-Results-2023.pdf
    January 01, 2023 - (Item WPI1) Excellent or Very Good 19% 18% 63% Excellent 7% 3% 25% Very Good 12% 16% 38% Good … (Item WPI1) Excellent or Very Good 59% 42% 22% 31% Excellent 24% 15% 0% 6% Very Good 35% 27% 22% … (Item WPI1) Excellent or Very Good 46% 49% 48% 48% Excellent 18% 17% 14% 17% Very Good 29% 32% … (Item WPI1) Excellent or Very Good 48% 59% Excellent 16% 23% Very Good 32% 36% Good 31% 28% … (Item WPI1) Excellent or Very Good 57% 54% 48% 52% 49% Excellent 26% 20% 17% 17% 16% Very Good

Search the AHRQ Archive

Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.

Search Archive

Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site

You selected to view results for the following site: