-
pcmh.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/instructor/reference/smpcefm.html
March 01, 2014 - inadequate, did not meet, ineffective
2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective
3 = Excellent … exceeded, very effective
Module 01: Introduction - 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … Comments:
Module 02: Team Structure - 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … inadequate, did not meet, ineffective
2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective
3 = Excellent … 1
2
3
Module 04: Leading Teams - 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent
-
pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/education/curriculum-tools/teamstepps/instructor/reference/smpcefm.docx
May 02, 2006 - did not meet, ineffective
Scale 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective
(Circle one) 3 = Excellent … exceeded, very effective
Module 0I: Introduction – 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 02: Team Structure – 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 04: Leading Teams – 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 06: Mutual Support – 50 minutes
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent
-
pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2022-MOSOPS-Database-Report-Part-II-508.pdf
January 01, 2022 - (Item G1a)
Excellent or Very good 69% 78% 74% 69% 63% 61% 56%
5 - Excellent 35% 43% 36% 33% 28% 26% … (Item G2)
Excellent or Very good 64% 76% 71% 66% 57% 58% 51%
5 - Excellent 27% 35% 30% 27% 23% 20% … (Item G1a)
Excellent or Very good 71% 60%
5 - Excellent 36% 23%
4 - Very good 35% 37%
3 - Good … (Item G1b)
Excellent or Very good 73% 64%
5 - Excellent 36% 24%
4 - Very good 37% 40%
3 - Good … (Item G2)
Excellent or Very good 67% 56%
5 - Excellent 29% 18%
4 - Very good 38% 39%
3 - Good
-
pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2020_MOSOPS_Part_II_508.pdf
January 01, 2020 - (G1a)
Excellent or Very good 77% 76% 71% 71% 66% 65% 71%
5 - Excellent 42% 37% 37% 34% 30% 28% 32% … (G1b)
Excellent or Very good 75% 75% 71% 70% 67% 69% 75%
5 - Excellent 37% 34% 34% 32% 31% … (G1c)
Excellent or Very good 64% 63% 55% 56% 50% 49% 48%
5 - Excellent 29% 26% 24% 23% 19% 18% 17% … (G1d)
Excellent or Very good 70% 69% 64% 61% 57% 56% 56%
5 - Excellent 36% 28% 28% 25% 21% 22% 20% … (G2)
Excellent or Very good 75% 73% 69% 68% 62% 61% 65%
5 - Excellent 38% 32% 31% 28% 25% 23% 25%
-
pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/hospital/MOSOPS-2022-Overview-Infographic-508.pdf
January 01, 2022 - Ratings on Quality
Highest Rated
Equitable 83%
of respondents reported that their medical office is
"Excellent … Lowest Rated
Timely 57%
of respondents reported that their medical office is
"Excellent" or "Very … office on patient safety
65%
of respondents gave their medical
office a patient safety rating of
"Excellent … Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Note: Chart totals may not add to 100% due to rounding. … The % "Excellent" or "Very Good" is based on unrounded numbers.
What's Next?
-
pcmh.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/officebasedcare/handouts/courseeval.html
December 01, 2015 - inadequate, did not meet, ineffective
2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective
3 = Excellent … 1
2
3
Comments:
Teaching and Coaching
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent … 1
2
3
Comments:
Change Management
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent
To … 1
2
3
Comments:
Measurement
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent
To what … 1
2
3
Comments:
Implementation Planning
Instructor Name:
Poor
Good
Excellent
-
pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/2018mosopsdatabasereport-part2.pdf
April 01, 2018 - (G1a)
Excellent or Very Good 76% 78% 73% 70% 69% 68% 65%
5 - Excellent 41% 42% 37% 34% 32% 30% 29% … (G1b)
Excellent or Very Good 76% 75% 71% 71% 69% 68% 67%
5 - Excellent 37% 39% 35% 33% 31% 29% 31% … (G1d)
Excellent or Very Good 67% 69% 63% 60% 58% 54% 48%
5 - Excellent 32% 32% 27% 26% 22% 20% 16% … (G1a)
Excellent or Very Good 73% 69%
5 - Excellent 38% 31%
4 - Very Good 35% 38%
3 - Good 22% … (G1b)
Excellent or Very Good 73% 68%
5 - Excellent 36% 29%
4 - Very Good 37% 40%
3 - Good 23%
-
pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/education/curriculum-tools/teamstepps/officebasedcare/handouts/courseeval.pdf
December 02, 2015 - did not meet, ineffective
Scale 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective
(Circle one) 3 = Excellent … than adequate, exceeded,
very effective
TeamSTEPPS Fundamentals
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … .......... 1 2 3
Comments:
Summary: Putting It All Together
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … did not meet, ineffective
Scale 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective
(Circle one) 3 = Excellent … , more than adequate, exceeded,
very effective
Measurement
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
-
pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/hospitalvaluepilotreport.pdf
November 01, 2017 - Excellent or Very Good 68% 68% 66%
Excellent 33% 31% 29%
Very Good 35% 37% 37%
Good 26% 25% 27% … Excellent or Very Good 64% 64% 66%
Excellent 26% 26% 29%
Very Good 38% 38% 37%
Good 28% 27% 26% … In addition, the percentages for Excellent and Very Good may not add to the
subtotal for “Excellent … Excellent or Very Good 57% 58% 58%
Excellent 24% 22% 22%
Very Good 34% 35% 36%
Good 30% 29% 30% … Excellent or Very Good 51% 53% 52%
Excellent 21% 20% 20%
Very Good 30% 34% 32%
Good 32% 31% 31%
-
pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/medical-office/2016/mosurvey2016pt2.pdf
January 01, 2016 - (G1b)
Excellent or Very Good 78% 73% 74% 70% 65% 66% 61%
5 - Excellent 43% 35% 35% 33% 28% … (G1e)
Excellent or Very Good 84% 79%
5 - Excellent 59% 51%
4 - Very Good 25% 28%
3 - Good … (G1a)
Excellent or Very Good 67% 76% 80% 73% 69% 71% 71% 82% 66%
5 - Excellent 34% 42% … (G1c)
Excellent or Very Good 52% 62% 62% 52% 48% 60% 52% 62% 55%
5 - Excellent 22% 31% … (G1d)
Excellent or Very Good 57% 67% 65% 62% 57% 64% 65% 73% 56%
5 - Excellent 24% 37%
-
pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2020_MOSOPS_Infographic.pdf
January 01, 2020 - Highest
Rated Equitable
84%
of respondents reported that their medical office is
"excellent" or … Lowest
Rated Timely
56%
of respondents reported that their medical office is
"excellent" or "very … Patient Safety Rating
Average respondent ratings of their medical office on patient safety
29%
Excellent
-
pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/nursing-home/2023-SOPS-Nursing-Home-DB-Infographic.pdf
January 01, 2023 - 8%
No
Overall Rating on Resident Safety
54%
of respondents
rated their nursing
home
“Excellent … ” or
“Very Good”
21%
Excellent
33%
Very
Good
28%
Good
15%
Fair
3%
Poor
Note
-
pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/medical-office/2016/mosurvey2016pt1.pdf
January 01, 2016 - (G1A)
Excellent/Very Good 71% 22.87% 0% 40% 57% 71% 89% 100% 100%
2. … (G1B)
Excellent/Very Good 70% 22.07% 0% 40% 57% 71% 87% 100% 100%
3. … (G1C)
Excellent/Very Good 56% 26.72% 0% 20% 38% 56% 75% 100% 100%
4. … (G1D)
Excellent/Very Good 62% 24.24% 0% 30% 45% 62% 80% 100% 100%
5. … (G1E)
Excellent/Very Good 83% 16.36% 0% 61% 74% 85% 100% 100% 100%
6.
-
pcmh.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/simulation/index.html
June 01, 2019 - It affords excellent opportunities to enhance the quality of continuing education for health care professionals
-
pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/nursing-home/2023-SOPS-Nursing-Home-DB-Part-II.pdf
January 01, 2023 - (Item E2)
Excellent or Very Good 61% 50%
Excellent 25% 18%
Very Good 36% 32%
Good 27% 29%
Fair … (Item E2)
Excellent or Very Good 45% 58%
Excellent 13% 24%
Very Good 32% 34%
Good 31% 27%
Fair … (Item E2)
Excellent or Very Good 72% 63% 57% 52% 50% 48% 53%
Excellent 33% 29% 22% 14% 19% 27% 22% … (Item E2)
Excellent or Very Good 51% 55% 54% 54%
Excellent 14% 22% 19% 20%
Very Good 37% 33% 35% … (Item E2)
Excellent or Very Good 57% 51% 51%
Excellent 22% 22% 19%
Very Good 34% 29% 32%
Good
-
pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/cahps/surveys-guidance/nh/nursing-home-long-stay-eng-651a.doc
March 09, 2007 - 1( OFTEN
2( SOMETIMES
3( RARELY
4( NEVER
[HAND R SHOWCARD 5: EXCELLENT/VERY GOOD/GOOD/FAIR/POOR] … In general, how would you rate your overall health – excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor? … 1( EXCELLENT
2( VERY GOOD
3( GOOD
4( FAIR
5( POOR
[HAND R SHOWCARD 6: 0-10]
These next questions … Probably No
Probably Yes
Definitely Yes
Showcard #3
Often
Sometimes
Rarely
Never
Showcard #4
Excellent
-
pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2022-mosops-database-report-part-I.pdf
January 01, 2022 - Lowest Rated
Timely 57%
of respondents reported that their medical office is
"Excellent" or "Very … Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Note: Chart totals may not add to 100% due to rounding. … The% "Excellent" or "Very Good" is based on unrounded numbers.
What's Next? … Effective
Is based on scientific
knowledge.
71% Positive
Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor … ” (Poor, Fair, Good, Very good, Excellent).
-
pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/2019-pharmacy-sops-database-report-appendix.pdf
January 01, 2019 - or Very good 94% 86% 78%
Excellent 55% 54% 42%
Very good 40% 32% 36%
Good 5% 11% 16%
Fair 1% … In addition, “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotal shown due to rounding.
2019 … In addition, “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotal shown due to rounding.
2019 … or Very good 85% 84% 92% 78%
Excellent 49% 48% 53% 47%
Very good 36% 35% 39% 31%
Good 11% 12% … In addition, “Excellent” and “Very good” may not add to the subtotal shown due to rounding.
-
pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/asc/2023-ASC-Database-Report-II.pdf
January 01, 2023 - o Average percentage of respondents who gave their ASC a Patient Safety Rating of
“Excellent” or “Very … (Item F1)
Excellent or Very good 89% 87% 86% 85% 83%
Excellent 56% 58% 57% 55% 49%
Very good … (Item F1)
Excellent or Very good 88% 87% 84% 84% 87% 87% 88% 81% 84%
Excellent 59% … (Item F1)
Excellent or Very good 87% 97% 89% 97% 92% 79% 83% 74% 85%
Excellent 59% 81% 50% 78% 68% … (Item F1)
Excellent or Very good 93% 83% 82% 89%
Excellent 71% 50% 46% 65%
Very good 22% 33%
-
pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/nursing-home/NH-WPS-Pilot-Study-Overall-Results-2023.pdf
January 01, 2023 - (Item WPI1)
Excellent or Very Good 19% 18% 63%
Excellent 7% 3% 25%
Very Good 12% 16% 38%
Good … (Item WPI1)
Excellent or Very Good 59% 42% 22% 31%
Excellent 24% 15% 0% 6%
Very Good 35% 27% 22% … (Item WPI1)
Excellent or Very Good 46% 49% 48% 48%
Excellent 18% 17% 14% 17%
Very Good 29% 32% … (Item WPI1)
Excellent or Very Good 48% 59%
Excellent 16% 23%
Very Good 32% 36%
Good 31% 28% … (Item WPI1)
Excellent or Very Good 57% 54% 48% 52% 49%
Excellent 26% 20% 17% 17% 16%
Very Good