Results

Total Results: over 10,000 records

Showing results for "excellent".

1. High reliability: excellent care every time. | PSNet
   psnet.ahrq.gov/issue/high-reliability-excellent-care-every-time
   July 19, 2018 - Newspaper/Magazine Article High reliability: excellent care every time. … High reliability: Excellent care every time. OR manager. 2016;32(3):22-6. … High reliability: Excellent care every time. OR manager. 2016;32(3):22-6.

2. Excellent review scheme for critical incidents but insufficient for revalidation. | PSNet
   psnet.ahrq.gov/issue/excellent-review-scheme-critical-incidents-insufficient-revalidation
   May 18, 2022 - Commentary Excellent review scheme for critical incidents but insufficient for revalidation … Excellent review scheme for critical incidents but insufficient for revalidation. … Excellent review scheme for critical incidents but insufficient for revalidation.

3. TeamSTEPPS2.0_final (doc file)
   www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/education/curriculum-tools/teamstepps/instructor/reference/smpcefm.docx
   May 02, 2006 - did not meet, ineffective Scale 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective (Circle one) 3 = Excellent … exceeded, very effective Module 0I: Introduction – 50 minutes Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3 Comments: Module 02: Team Structure – 50 minutes Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3 Comments: Module 04: Leading Teams – 50 minutes Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3 Comments: Module 06: Mutual Support – 50 minutes Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent

4. Course Evaluation | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
   www.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/instructor/reference/smpcefm.html
   March 01, 2014 - inadequate, did not meet, ineffective 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective 3 = Excellent … effective Module 01: Introduction - 50 minutes   Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent …   Module 02: Team Structure - 50 minutes   Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … inadequate, did not meet, ineffective 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective 3 = Excellent … 3 Module 04: Leading Teams - 50 minutes   Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent

5. TeamSTEPPS Course Evaluation (pdf file)
   www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/teamstepps/longtermcare/sitetools/ts2-0ltc_sample_course_evalform.pdf
   April 24, 2017 - Poor, inadequate, did not meet, ineffective 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective 3 = Excellent … exceeded, very effective Module 01: Introduction – 50 minutes Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3 Comments: Module 02: Team Structure – 50 minutes Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … Poor, inadequate, did not meet, ineffective 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective 3 = Excellent … 1 2 3 Comments: Module 04: Leading Teams – 50 minutes Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent

6. Appendix Executive Summary | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
   www.ahrq.gov/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/medical-office/2014/mosurv14apsumm.html
   June 01, 2014 - Percent positive scores for all five Overall Ratings on Quality (those responding "Excellent" or "Very … offices had higher percent positive scores for all five Overall Ratings on Quality (those responding "Excellent … only specialized in Pediatrics had the highest Overall Rating on Patient Safety (those responding "Excellent … had the highest percent positive scores for all five Overall Ratings on Quality (those responding "Excellent … had the highest percent positive scores for all five Overall Ratings on Quality (those responding "Excellent

7. Surveys on Patient Safety Culture (SOPS) Medical Office Survey: 2022 User Database Report Part II (pdf file)
   www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2022-MOSOPS-Database-Report-Part-II-508.pdf
   January 01, 2022 - (Item G1a) Excellent or Very good 69% 78% 74% 69% 63% 61% 56% 5 - Excellent 35% 43% 36% 33% 28% 26% … (Item G2) Excellent or Very good 64% 76% 71% 66% 57% 58% 51% 5 - Excellent 27% 35% 30% 27% 23% 20% … (Item G1a) Excellent or Very good 71% 60% 5 - Excellent 36% 23% 4 - Very good 35% 37% 3 - Good … (Item G1b) Excellent or Very good 73% 64% 5 - Excellent 36% 24% 4 - Very good 37% 40% 3 - Good … (Item G2) Excellent or Very good 67% 56% 5 - Excellent 29% 18% 4 - Very good 38% 39% 3 - Good

8. Surveys on Patient Safety Culture (SOPS) Medical Office Survey: 2020 User Database Report Part II (pdf file)
   www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2020_MOSOPS_Part_II_508.pdf
   January 01, 2020 - (G1a) Excellent or Very good 77% 76% 71% 71% 66% 65% 71% 5 - Excellent 42% 37% 37% 34% 30% 28% 32% … (G1b) Excellent or Very good 75% 75% 71% 70% 67% 69% 75% 5 - Excellent 37% 34% 34% 32% 31% … (G1c) Excellent or Very good 64% 63% 55% 56% 50% 49% 48% 5 - Excellent 29% 26% 24% 23% 19% 18% 17% … (G1d) Excellent or Very good 70% 69% 64% 61% 57% 56% 56% 5 - Excellent 36% 28% 28% 25% 21% 22% 20% … (G2) Excellent or Very good 75% 73% 69% 68% 62% 61% 65% 5 - Excellent 38% 32% 31% 28% 25% 23% 25%

9. Course Evaluation | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
   pbrn.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/instructor/reference/smpcefm.html
   March 01, 2014 - inadequate, did not meet, ineffective 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective 3 = Excellent … exceeded, very effective Module 01: Introduction - 50 minutes   Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … Comments:     Module 02: Team Structure - 50 minutes   Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … inadequate, did not meet, ineffective 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective 3 = Excellent … 1 2 3 Module 04: Leading Teams - 50 minutes   Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent

10. Course Evaluation | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
    pcmh.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/instructor/reference/smpcefm.html
    March 01, 2014 - inadequate, did not meet, ineffective 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective 3 = Excellent … exceeded, very effective Module 01: Introduction - 50 minutes   Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … Comments:     Module 02: Team Structure - 50 minutes   Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … inadequate, did not meet, ineffective 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective 3 = Excellent … 1 2 3 Module 04: Leading Teams - 50 minutes   Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent

11. Findings form the 2022 Surveys on Patient Safety Culture (SOPS®) Medical Office Database Overview Infographic (pdf file)
    www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/hospital/MOSOPS-2022-Overview-Infographic-508.pdf
    January 01, 2022 - Ratings on Quality Highest Rated Equitable 83% of respondents reported that their medical office is "Excellent … Lowest Rated Timely 57% of respondents reported that their medical office is "Excellent" or "Very … office on patient safety 65% of respondents gave their medical office a patient safety rating of "Excellent … Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Note: Chart totals may not add to 100% due to rounding. … The % "Excellent" or "Very Good" is based on unrounded numbers. What's Next?

12. Medical Office Survey on Patient Safety Culture: 2018 User Database Report, Part II (pdf file)
    www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/2018mosopsdatabasereport-part2.pdf
    April 01, 2018 - (G1a) Excellent or Very Good 76% 78% 73% 70% 69% 68% 65% 5 - Excellent 41% 42% 37% 34% 32% 30% 29% … (G1b) Excellent or Very Good 76% 75% 71% 71% 69% 68% 67% 5 - Excellent 37% 39% 35% 33% 31% 29% 31% … (G1d) Excellent or Very Good 67% 69% 63% 60% 58% 54% 48% 5 - Excellent 32% 32% 27% 26% 22% 20% 16% … (G1a) Excellent or Very Good 73% 69% 5 - Excellent 38% 31% 4 - Very Good 35% 38% 3 - Good 22% … (G1b) Excellent or Very Good 73% 68% 5 - Excellent 36% 29% 4 - Very Good 37% 40% 3 - Good 23%

13. TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form (pdf file)
    www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/teamstepps-program/tools/ts-course-evaluation-form.pdf
    June 01, 2023 - Poor, inadequate, did not meet, ineffective 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective 3 = Excellent … , more than adequate, exceeded, very effective Introduction Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3 Comments: Module 1: Communication Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent To what extent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 3 Module 2: Team Leadership Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 4 Module 4: Mutual Support Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent

14. Surveys on Patient Safety Culture (SOPS) Medical Office Survey: 2024 User Database Report Part II (pdf file)
    www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2024-medical-office-database-report-appendix.pdf
    January 01, 2024 - (Item G1D) Excellent or Very good 57% 66% 61% 58% 54% 51% Excellent 28% 26% 25% 23% 20% 16% … (Item G1E) Excellent or Very good 82% 83% 82% 80% 78% 75% Excellent 56% 55% 53% 53% 47% 42% … (Item G2) Excellent or Very good 66% 59% Excellent 27% 22% Very good 38% 37% Good 26% 31% … (Item G1D) Excellent or Very good 59% 61% 57% 53% Excellent 23% 23% 19% 18% Very good 36% 38% … (Item G2) Excellent or Very good 64% 65% 69% 66% Excellent 24% 22% 27% 28% Very good 40%

15. TeamSTEPPS® for Office-Based Care - Course Evaluation (pdf file)
    www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/education/curriculum-tools/teamstepps/officebasedcare/handouts/courseeval.pdf
    December 02, 2015 - did not meet, ineffective Scale 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective (Circle one) 3 = Excellent … than adequate, exceeded, very effective TeamSTEPPS Fundamentals Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … .......... 1 2 3 Comments: Summary: Putting It All Together Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … did not meet, ineffective Scale 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective (Circle one) 3 = Excellent … , more than adequate, exceeded, very effective Measurement Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent

16. Executive Summary | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
    www.ahrq.gov/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/medical-office/2014/mosurv14sum.html
    June 01, 2014 - Percent positive scores for all five Overall Ratings on Quality (those responding "Excellent" or "Very … only specialized in Pediatrics had the highest Overall Rating on Patient Safety (those responding "Excellent … had the highest percent positive scores for all five Overall Ratings on Quality (those responding "Excellent … had the highest percent positive scores for all five Overall Ratings on Quality (those responding "Excellent … had the highest percent positive scores for all five Overall Ratings on Quality (those responding "Excellent

17. Psn-Pdf (pdf file)
    psnet.ahrq.gov/node/45322/psn-pdf
    July 20, 2016 - RN assessments of excellent quality of care and patient safety are associated with significantly lower … RN assessments of excellent quality of care and patient safety are associated with significantly lower … https://psnet.ahrq.gov/issue/rn-assessments-excellent-quality-care-and-patient-safety-are-associated- … This study found that in hospitals where nurses rated quality of care as excellent, 30-day postsurgical … https://psnet.ahrq.gov/issue/rn-assessments-excellent-quality-care-and-patient-safety-are-associated-significantly-lower

18. Diagnostic Excellence. | PSNet
    psnet.ahrq.gov/issue/diagnostic-excellence-0
    December 08, 2021 - Special or Theme Issue Diagnostic Excellence. Citation Text: Diagnostic Excellence. JAMA. Nov 2021-Sep 2022.  Copy Citation Save Save to your library Print Download PDF Share Facebook Twitter Linkedin Copy URL …

19. AHRQ CVE Pilot Study_Hospital Final Report_11-2-2017 (pdf file)
    www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/hospitalvaluepilotreport.pdf
    November 01, 2017 - Excellent or Very Good 68% 68% 66% Excellent 33% 31% 29% Very Good 35% 37% 37% Good 26% 25% 27% … Excellent or Very Good 64% 64% 66% Excellent 26% 26% 29% Very Good 38% 38% 37% Good 28% 27% 26% … In addition, the percentages for Excellent and Very Good may not add to the subtotal for “Excellent … Excellent or Very Good 57% 58% 58% Excellent 24% 22% 22% Very Good 34% 35% 36% Good 30% 29% 30% … Excellent or Very Good 51% 53% 52% Excellent 21% 20% 20% Very Good 30% 34% 32% Good 32% 31% 31%

20. AHRQ Hospital Pilot Study Final Report (pdf file)
    www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/hospvaluepilotreport.pdf
    November 01, 2017 - Excellent or Very Good 68% 68% 66% Excellent 33% 31% 29% Very Good 35% 37% 37% Good 26% 25% 27% … Excellent or Very Good 64% 64% 66% Excellent 26% 26% 29% Very Good 38% 38% 37% Good 28% 27% 26% … In addition, the percentages for Excellent and Very Good may not add to the subtotal for “Excellent … Excellent or Very Good 57% 58% 58% Excellent 24% 22% 22% Very Good 34% 35% 36% Good 30% 29% 30% … Excellent or Very Good 51% 53% 52% Excellent 21% 20% 20% Very Good 30% 34% 32% Good 32% 31% 31%