-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/health-topics/penis-disorders
June 28, 2017 - Supplemental Project To Assess the Transparency of Reporting for Trials Evaluating Treatment for Infertility
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/health-topics/peripheral-nerve-disorders
September 06, 2016 - 2016
Supplemental Project To Assess the Transparency of Reporting Requirements for Studies Evaluating
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/transparency-neuropathy/research
July 28, 2017 - Supplemental Project To Assess the Transparency of Reporting Requirements for Studies Evaluating the … methods
Two independent reviewers screened ClinicalTrials.gov records for randomized controlled trials evaluating … Supplemental Project to Assess the Transparency of Reporting Requirements for Studies Evaluating the
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/rti-item-bank/research
August 05, 2013 - We then refined and reduced the set of “core” questions that would most likely be necessary for evaluating … With the help of the Working Group, we narrowed the list of RTI Item Bank questions for evaluating risk … Consensus around specific items necessary for evaluating risk of bias for different types of observational
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/health-topics/neurologic-diseases
May 20, 2013 - Wireless Motility Capsule Versus Other Diagnostic Technologies for Evaluating Gastroparesis and Constipation … Archived
May 20, 2013
Wireless Motility Capsule Versus Other Diagnostic Technologies for Evaluating … 2013
Supplemental Project To Assess the Transparency of Reporting Requirements for Studies Evaluating
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/transparency-infertility/research
June 28, 2017 - Supplemental Project To Assess the Transparency of Reporting for Trials Evaluating Treatment for Infertility … Supplemental Project To Assess the Transparency of Reporting for Trials Evaluating Treatment for Infertility
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cystic-fibrosis-hgh_appendixes.pdf
January 01, 2009 - Not evaluating
malignancy outcomes
Bozzola M, De Amici M, Zecca M, et al. … Not evaluating
malignancy outcomes
Kaplowitz PB, Rundle AC, Blethen SL. … Not evaluating use of
rhGH
Milner RD, Preece MA, Tanner JM. … Not evaluating
malignancy outcomes
Steinhausen HC, Dorr HG, Malin Z. … Not evaluating
malignancy outcomes
Xu W, Janss A, Moshang T.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/genetic-tests-validity-rating-evaluation/research
June 16, 2011 - frameworks for common testing scenarios; (2) recommend a systematic approach to literature search for evaluating … Results
This study found that different stakeholders are likely to use different frameworks for evaluating … from patients' perspectives, and clarify an instrument for assessing analytic validity studies for evaluating
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/renal-disease-therapies/abstract
March 31, 2011 - Patients on dialysis have generally been excluded from studies evaluating the effectiveness of antihypertensive … Also, studies evaluating the independent effect of separate classes of antihypertensive therapies on
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/methodsguide_chou_assessing_harms_when_comparing.pdf
November 01, 2008 - In addition to evaluating results of published
RCTs, CER authors should consider including results … Such studies are probably
most useful for evaluating serious harms that are more reliably reported … previously unsuspected adverse events than when evaluating a known harm or
intended effects. … Registries for
evaluating patient outcomes: a user’s guide.
AHRQ Publication NO. 07-EHC001-1. … Evaluating non-randomised intervention
studies Health Technology Assessment
(Winchester, England)
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/methods-guidance-harms_methods.pdf
November 01, 2008 - In addition to evaluating results of published
RCTs, CER authors should consider including results … Such studies are probably
most useful for evaluating serious harms that are more reliably reported … previously unsuspected adverse events than when evaluating a known harm or
intended effects. … Registries for
evaluating patient outcomes: a user’s guide.
AHRQ Publication NO. 07-EHC001-1. … Evaluating non-randomised intervention
studies Health Technology Assessment
(Winchester, England)
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/system/files/docs/topic-brief-digital-apps-mental-health.pdf
October 29, 2020 - Six online tools focused on aiding the individual consumer in evaluating mental health apps:
• One … The proposed technical brief could also consider feasibility of evaluating apps based on the
stated … tools
for evaluating mental health apps. … Developing a Framework for
Evaluating the Patient Engagement, Quality, and
Safety of Mobile Health … An evidence-based evaluation of tools for evaluating
mental health apps could be useful for industry
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/methods-guidance-tests-genetic_methods.pdf
July 01, 2012 - This chapter is not
intended to provide comprehensive guidance on evaluating all genetic tests. … The general principles
for evaluating genetic tests are similar to those for interpreting other prognostic … It is not intended to provide
comprehensive guidance on evaluating all genetic tests. … Finally, statistical issues must be taken into account when evaluating studies of genetic tests. … What guidelines have been developed for evaluating program performance?
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/biorepositories-registries-guide-3rd-ed-addendum-white-paper.pdf
February 01, 2018 - Research White Paper Biorepositories Addendum Registries For Evaluating Patient Outcomes Third Edition … White Paper
Biorepositories
Research White Paper
Biorepositories
Addendum to Registries for Evaluating … White Paper, addendum to Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User’s Guide, Third
Edition. … Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes:
A User’s Guide. Third edition. Two
volumes. … Biorepositories
Conclusions
References
Front matter_Biorepositories_FINAL.pdf
Addendum to Registries for Evaluating
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/biorepositories-registries-guide-3rd-ed-addendum-white-paper.pdf
February 01, 2018 - Research White Paper Biorepositories Addendum Registries For Evaluating Patient Outcomes Third Edition … White Paper
Biorepositories
Research White Paper
Biorepositories
Addendum to Registries for Evaluating … White Paper, addendum to Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User’s Guide, Third
Edition. … Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes:
A User’s Guide. Third edition. Two
volumes. … Biorepositories
Conclusions
References
Front matter_Biorepositories_FINAL.pdf
Addendum to Registries for Evaluating
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/registry-of-patient-registries/advancing-registry-methodology-and-transparency
December 06, 2019 - Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User's Guide
The AHRQ publication " Registries for Evaluating
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/registries-guide_executive.pdf
April 01, 2007 - Layout 1
User’s Guide to
Registries Evaluating
Patient Outcomes:
Summary
Advancing Excellence in … Copyright information:
Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User’s Guide and User’s Guide to … Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User’s Guide. … “Evaluating Registries” outlines elements of quality
to be considered in setting up or evaluating a registry … Evaluating Registries
*Lohr KN.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/rti-item-bank-bias-precision_research.pdf
September 01, 2011 - The resulting RTI item bank, consisting of 29 questions for evaluating the risk of bias
and precision … This approach relies less on judgment10 but may fall short of evaluating believability. … Therefore, we sought to reduce the
number of items in the bank to questions relevant for evaluating … The tool retains other,
more direct questions for evaluating precision. … Evaluating non-randomised intervention
studies.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cer-204-obesity-disposition-comments.pdf
December 01, 2017 - Disposition of Comments for CER 204 Methods for Evaluating Natural Experiments in Obesity
Comparative … Effectiveness Review Disposition of Comments Report
Research Review Title:
Methods for Evaluating … Methods for Evaluating Natural
Experiments in Obesity: A Systematic Evidence Review. … Reviewer #2: Introduction The section on challenges in evaluating programs, policies etc. … As mentioned in the methods section,
evaluating the quality of any of these data
sources is out of
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/cancer-registry-pet/abstract
April 14, 2010 - Evaluating Outcomes of PET Scanning Using the National Oncologic PET Registry
Research Report April