Results

Total Results: over 10,000 records

Showing results for "discussion".

8921. Psn-Pdf (pdf file)
      psnet.ahrq.gov/node/49606/psn-pdf
      August 01, 2010 - https://psnet.ahrq.gov//#references The patient underwent a preoperative evaluation and, after a discussion

8922. Renal Failure Due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia | PSNet
      psnet.ahrq.gov/web-mm/renal-failure-due-benign-prostatic-hyperplasia
      February 01, 2004 - More serious complications of BPH include acute urinary retention and, in the case under discussion,

8923. Difficult Encounters: A CMO and CNO Respond | PSNet
      psnet.ahrq.gov/web-mm/difficult-encounters-cmo-and-cno-respond
      March 01, 2018 - SPOTLIGHT CASE Difficult Encounters: A CMO and CNO Respond Citation Text: Ring EJ, Hirsch JE. Difficult Encounters: A CMO and CNO Respond. PSNet [internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, US Department of Health and Human Services. 2009. Copy Citation Format: …

8924. Safe Medication Administration: Magnesium Sulfate | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
      www.ahrq.gov/patient-safety/settings/labor-delivery/perinatal-care/modules/strategies/medication/tool-safe-mgso4.html
      July 01, 2023 - Safe Medication Administration: Magnesium Sulfate AHRQ Safety Program for Perinatal Care Purpose of the tool: This tool describes the key perinatal safety elements with examples for the safe administration of magnesium sulfate during labor. The key elements are presented within the framework of t…

8925. Section 2: Engaging Stakeholders in a Care Management Program | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
      www.ahrq.gov/patient-safety/settings/long-term-care/resource/hcbs/medicaidmgmt/mm2.html
      October 01, 2014 - Designing and Implementing Medicaid Disease and Care Management Programs Section 2: Engaging Stakeholders in a Care Management Program Previous Page Next Page Table of Contents Designing and Implementing Medicaid Disease and Care Management Programs Introduction Section 1: Planning a Care Manage…

8926. PowerPoint Presentation
      www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/antibiotic-use/best-practices/CDI-slides.pptx
      November 01, 2019 - PowerPoint Presentation Best Practices in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Clostridioides difficile Infections Acute Care AHRQ Safety Program for Improving Antibiotic Use AHRQ Pub. No. 17(20)-0028-EF November 2019 Clostridioides difficile AHRQ Safety Program for Improving Antibiotic Use – Acute Care 1 Objectives …

8927. Cognitive Engineering for Complex Decision Making & Problem Solving in Acute Care - Final Report (pdf file)
      digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/citation/r01hs022542-hettinger-final-report-2020.pdf
      January 01, 2020 - importance of initiative and adaptation in nurse decision making and forms the basis for further study and discussion

8928. Long-Term-Care-Adults Research-Protocol (pdf file)
      effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/long-term-care-adults_research-protocol.pdf
      December 20, 2011 - Discussion with key informants also helped us define the settings and services covered under HCBS. … Disagreements will be resolved by discussion or, when needed, by consultation with a third reviewer

8929. Ch 10-User-Guide-To-Ocer 130129 (pdf file)
      effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/ch_10-user-guide-to-ocer_130129.pdf
      January 01, 2011 - See chapter 7 (Covariate Selection) for further discussion. … Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables (with discussion).

8930. Screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement (pdf file)
      www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/9K4QQKvhXZNJLCxNX3FkZm
      May 01, 2008 - DISCUSSION Burden of Disease Gestational diabetes mellitus is currently defined as any degree of glucose … The discussion should include inform ation about the uncertain benefits and harm s as w ell as the

8931. Speaking Plainly: Communicating the Patient’s Role in Health Care Safety (pdf file)
      www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patient-safety-resources/resources/advances-in-patient-safety/vol4/Miranda.pdf
      July 01, 2004 - Yet, after relatively little discussion, beneficiaries in focus groups generally believed the phrase … Part of that discussion should address the topic of choosing the best hospital for the particular patient

8932. Measuring Safety Climate in Primary Care Offices (pdf file)
      www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patient-safety-resources/resources/advances-in-patient-safety-2/vol2/Advances-SinghG_67.pdf
      April 14, 2008 - Discussion The SAQ-A proved to be practical and convenient to administer in a variety of primary care … NationalPatientSafetyGoals/07_npsgs.htm Abstract Introduction Methods Data Collection Data Analysis Results Discussion

8933. ___APS-DRG_Def.book (pdf file)
      hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/APS_DRGsDefManualV26Public.pdf
      April 01, 2010 - . . . .6 Severity Adjustment Using the APS-DRGs® . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 Discussion … Development Philosophy • Severity Adjustment Using the MS-DRGs • Severity Adjustment Using the APS-DRGs® • Discussion … DISCUSSION APS-DRGs® have proven to be statistically and clinically relevant for analyzing inpatient … Consolidated DRGs 333 407 # Severity Classes 1-3 3 S-DRGs® Definitions Manual 10 Chapter 2: APS-DRGs® Discussion … Severity Levels Dividing Base DRGs into Severity Subclasses Severity Adjustment Using the APS-DRGs® Discussion

8934. ___APS-Def_Public.book (pdf file)
      hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/APS-DRGsDefManualV27Public.pdf
      April 01, 2010 - Adjustment Using the APS-DRGs® . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Discussion … Development Philosophy • Severity Adjustment Using the MS-DRGs • Severity Adjustment Using the APS-DRGs® • Discussion … DISCUSSION APS-DRGs® have proven to be statistically and clinically relevant for analyzing inpatient … Consolidated DRGs 333 407 # Severity Classes 1-3 3 S-DRGs® Definitions Manual 10 Chapter 2: APS-DRGs® Discussion … Severity Levels Dividing Base DRGs into Severity Subclasses Severity Adjustment Using the APS-DRGs® Discussion

8935. Evidence-based Practice Center Future Research Needs (pdf file)
      effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/ongoing-studies-evidence_research.pdf
      December 01, 2010 - Discussion .......................................................................................... … Discussion The objective of this methods project was to assess the sources and strategies for finding … about current ongoing trials in hand is only part of the process of refining the future research needs discussion … Discussion includes mention of “uncertainties” that remain, but no explicit research recommenda … Science University Yes Narrative Roughly 1 sentence on future research per Key Question in “discussion

8936. Ced-Topic-Refinement (pdf file)
      effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/ced-topic-refinement.pdf
      November 01, 2022 - investigator moderated the KI call and highlighted the comments from the KIs that required further discussion … The discussion points from the KI meeting were used to further revise the requirements and a second feedback … After discussion with the KI Panel, this requirement was deemed unnecessary, as Institutional Review … Code of Federal Regulations; CMS = Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services *11 KIs voting In the discussion … Based on the discussion with the KIs, the proposed requirements were amended and re-ordered.

8937. Evaluating Practices and Developing Tools for Comparative Effectiveness Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy: Methods for the Joint Meta-Analysis of Multiple Tests (pdf file)
      effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/diagnostic-tests-accuracy_research.pdf
      January 01, 2013 - Discussion .......................................................................................... … We then present an analysis of the data, and we conclude with a discussion of the method and its applications … See Lu and Ades for a short discussion on the density of the elements of R using the priors above.48 … See Pinheiro and Bates for a discussion of additional parameterizations.49 95% Credible Intervals … 34 Discussion We propose models for the joint (multivariate) meta-analysis of M ≥ 2 diagnostic tests

8938. Trust & Patient-Centeredness Workgroup: Improving the Source Credibility of Patient-Centered Clinical Decision Support Tools (pdf file)
      cdsic.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/2023-08/Final%20TPC%20P3_Source%20Credibility%20to%20AHRQ%208.2.23_508c%20Version.pdf
      January 01, 2023 - Discussion .......................................................................................... … • Section 6, Discussion, synthesizes our findings and explores key considerations regarding the … Interviews were organized using a semistructured discussion guide. … Discussion Source credibility is an important factor in ensuring that PC CDS delivers its full potential … Discussion 5.1 Key Considerations 5.2 Limitations 5.3 Evidence Gaps & Research Opportunities 6.

8939. AHRQ Health Information Technology Portfolio’s 2009 Annual Report (pdf file)
      digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/page/Abridged_ReportHIT2009.pdf
      November 17, 2011 - RESULTS AND DISCUSSION .............................................................................. … Results and Discussion Through these 180 projects, AHRQ is supporting the development and dissemination … A Panel Discussion First Do No Harm: Ensuring the Safe and Effective Use of Health IT: A Panel Discussion … A Panel Discussion Seeing the Forest for Panel Discussion the Trees: Are Electronic Health Records

8940. Analysis of Requirements for Coverage With Evidence Development (CED) - Topic Refinement (pdf file)
      www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/research/findings/ta/topicrefinement/ced-topic-refinement.pdf
      November 01, 2022 - investigator moderated the KI call and highlighted the comments from the KIs that required further discussion … The discussion points from the KI meeting were used to further revise the requirements and a second … After discussion with the KI Panel, this requirement was deemed unnecessary, as Institutional Review … Code of Federal Regulations; CMS = Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services *11 KIs voting In the discussion … Based on the discussion with the KIs, the proposed requirements were amended and re-ordered.