-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/trauma-interventions-maltreatment-child_executive.pdf
April 01, 2013 - We revised the KQs as needed
based on review of the comments and discussion with a
seven-member Technical … Reviewers resolved
conflicts by discussion and consensus or by consulting a
third member of the review … Disagreements between the two reviewers were
resolved by discussion and consensus or by consulting a … grade for each key outcome listed
in the framework; they resolved any conflicts through
consensus discussion … Discussion
Key Findings and Strength of Evidence
Overall, the evidence from 24 trials (23 randomized
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/glaucoma-treatment_executive.pdf
April 01, 2012 - Disagreements about eligibility
were resolved through discussion among reviewers. … We resolved any disagreements
regarding inclusion through discussion or, as needed,
adjudicated unresolved … We again resolved
disagreements through discussion. … The two reviewers resolved disagreements
through discussion. … Arch Ophthalmol.
2002;120(6):701-13; discussion 829-30.
5. Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, et al.
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/APS-DRGs%20V22%20Definitions%20Manual.pdf
April 01, 2006 - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8
Discussion … CMS DRGs
• Severity Adjustment Using the APS-DRGs®
• Additional APS-DRGs® Enhancements
• Results
• Discussion … Classes Surgical N/A 3
rsion 22 APS-DRGs® Definitions Manual 8
Chapter 2: Overview of the APS-DRGs® Discussion … DISCUSSION
APS-DRGs® have proven to be statistically and clinically relevant for analyzing
inpatient … the CMS DRGs
Severity Adjustment Using the APS-DRGs®
Additional APS-DRGs® Enhancements
Results
Discussion
-
cdsic.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/2024-07/SRF_Taxonomy%20of%20PC%20CDS%20Override%20Recommendations_508_0.pdf
January 01, 2024 - Discussion .......................................................................................... … viii
Discussion and Future Directions for Research and Use
While override reasons for traditional … Interviewers used semistructured discussion
guides to garner feedback on the comprehensiveness, clarity … Discussion
This taxonomy includes high-level domains and corresponding subdomains of reasons why recipients … Discussion
4.1 Future Directions for Research and Use
4.2 Limitations
5.
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-evidence-summary/screening-for-prediabetes-and-type-2-diabetes
August 24, 2021 - Table of Contents
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion … Disagreements were resolved by discussion and consensus. … Supplement) developed by the USPSTF and adapted for this topic. 7 Disagreements were resolved by discussion … Discrepancies were resolved through consensus discussion. … Return to Table of Contents
Discussion
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/RrE4_peSk5zVH3cCf77at3
June 24, 2025 - Disagreements were resolved with discussion or with an
independent assessment from a third senior investigator … com-
pleted screening questionnaire in the chart for the clinician if the
screen result was positive; discussion … Any discussion of the positive finding was left
to the discretion of the treating clinician. … Standard care includes assessment and referral for IPV during first home visit; during subsequent visits,
discussion … and a specificity of 84% (95% CI, 76%-91%).55
Detailed results are available in the full report.12
Discussion
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-evidence-summary/latent-tuberculosis-infection-screening
May 02, 2023 - Table of Contents
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion … Disagreements were resolved by discussion and consensus. … assessing risk of bias (eMethods 4 in the JAMA Supplement). 9 , 11 , 12 Disagreements were resolved by discussion … Discrepancies were resolved through consensus discussion. … Return to Table of Contents
Discussion
-
www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/systems/hospital/engagingfamilies/strategy4/Strat4_Implement_Hndbook_508_v2.pdf
April 01, 2011 - • Use the Be Prepared to Go Home Checklist and Booklet (Tools 2a and
2b) as a starting point for discussion
-
www.ahrq.gov/hai/cusp/toolkit/content-calls/zero-clabsi.html
April 01, 2013 - Avoiding the femoral, that largely was a physician-nurse discussion and then administrative backing to
-
digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/page/C_RelevantLegalRequirementsforHealthDataExchange_1.pdf
May 23, 2007 - so would have to implement digital signatures based on a public
key infrastructure (PKI) (see the discussion
-
digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/page/C_RelevantLegalRequirementsforHealthDataExchange_0.pdf
May 23, 2007 - so would have to implement digital signatures based on a public
key infrastructure (PKI) (see the discussion
-
digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/citation/09-10-0091-1-EF.pdf
October 01, 2009 - a scientific journal to focus on these topics, there is much that can be done to foster
purposeful discussion
-
psnet.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/2020-07/spotlight_nstemi.pdf
January 01, 2020 - • A multi-disciplinary discussion between interventional
cardiology and cardiothoracic surgery concluded
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/breast-cancer-risk-reduction_research.pdf
October 25, 2010 - ............................................................................................... 20
Discussion … Discussion of Process Issues or Recommendations
Engaging stakeholders to shape research so that it … This format facilitates
discussion of outcomes, but it makes it very difficult to focus attention on … We have used rounded boxes to highlight important topics for future research discussion
and we have … Breast cancer risk reduction options:
awareness, discussion, and use among
women from four ethnic groups
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/future05-breastcancer-10-5-2010final.pdf
September 01, 2010 - .............................................................................................. 20
Discussion … Discussion of Process Issues or Recommendations
Engaging stakeholders to shape research so that it … This format facilitates
discussion of outcomes, but it makes it very difficult to focus attention on … We have used rounded boxes to highlight important topics for future research discussion
and we have … Breast cancer risk reduction options:
awareness, discussion, and use among
women from four ethnic
-
psnet.ahrq.gov/node/40656/psn-pdf
October 16, 2012 - Defining health information technology–related errors:
new developments since To Err Is Human.
October 16, 2012
Sittig DF, Singh H. Defining health information technology-related errors: new developments since to err is
human. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(14):1281-4. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.327.
https://psnet.…
-
digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/privacy-and-security-solutions-interoperable-hie-ok
January 01, 2023 - Privacy and Security Solutions for Interoperable Health Information Exchange / Oklahoma
Project Description
Project Details -
Completed
Contract Number
290-05-0015-RTI-026
Funding Mechanism(s)
Health Information Security and Privacy Col…
-
psnet.ahrq.gov/node/47634/psn-pdf
January 09, 2019 - Adverse Events in Long-Term-Care Hospitals: National
Incidence Among Medicare Beneficiaries.
January 9, 2019
Levinson DR. Adverse Events In Long-Term-Care Hospitals: National Incidence Among Medicare
Beneficiaries. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Inspector
General; 2018. R…
-
psnet.ahrq.gov/node/46902/psn-pdf
August 20, 2018 - Making soft intelligence hard: a multi-site qualitative
study of challenges relating to voice about safety
concerns.
August 20, 2018
Martin G, Aveling E-L, Campbell A, et al. Making soft intelligence hard: a multi-site qualitative study of
challenges relating to voice about safety concerns. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018;27(9…
-
psnet.ahrq.gov/node/45884/psn-pdf
January 01, 2020 - Cost–benefit analysis of a support program for nursing
staff.
December 21, 2017
Moran D, Wu AW, Connors C, et al. Cost-Benefit Analysis of a Support Program for Nursing Staff. J Patient
Saf. 2020;16(4):e250-e254. doi:10.1097/pts.0000000000000376.
https://psnet.ahrq.gov/issue/cost-benefit-analysis-support-program-n…