Results

Total Results: 974 records

Showing results for "decision".

  1. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/oral-health-children-adolescents-screening-preventive-interventions
    November 07, 2023 - Clinicians should understand the evidence but individualize decision making to the specific patient or … Clinicians should understand the evidence but individualize decision-making to the specific patient or … AHRQ staff had no role in the approval of the final recommendation statement or the decision to submit
  2. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/about-uspstf/methods-and-processes/current-processes-refining-evidence-based-recommendation-development
    January 01, 2014 - The Task Force does not advocate for prevention, perform decision analysis to routinely standardize the … The Task Force views its role as a decision maker engaged in a deliberative process.
  3. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/methods-and-processes/uspstf-analytic-framework-child-and-adolescent-health-topics
    October 01, 2017 - USPSTF Analytic Framework for Child and Adolescent Health Topics Share to Facebook Share to X Share to WhatsApp Share to Email Print The USPSTF has developed a new way of approaching the evidence on preventive services for children and adoles…
  4. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/sites/default/files/2025-03/uspstf-value-primary-care-fact-sheet-2025.pdf
    January 01, 2025 - USPSTF: The Primary Care Clinician’s Source for Prevention Recommendations ’ USPSTF: The Primary Care Clinician’s Source for Prevention Recommendations What is the mission of the U.S. Preventive Services Task …
  5. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/2Wc3FRHpVDPX2jT_WzjEXX
    July 31, 2020 - Clinicians should understand the evidence but individualize decision-making to the specific patient or … In addition, the USPSTF concluded that the decision to screen for colorectal can- cer in adults aged … AHRQ staff had no role in the approval of the final recommendation statement or the decision to submit … Clinicians should understand the evidence but individualize decision-making to the specific patient or … Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Decision Analysis for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
  6. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/hEp2uYfD9KRhYTY5fGr8Tp
    October 15, 2018 - Clinicians should understand the evidence but individualize decision making to the specific patient or … AHRQ staff had no role in the approval of the final recommendation statement or the decision to submit
  7. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/3w8Wr9wwAyAqUJWmJo_bL-
    February 01, 2014 - The investigators were solely responsible for the content and the decision to submit the manuscript for … How- ever, how and when the benefit–harm ratio shifts for women facing this decision is uncertain. … How these factors influence patient decision making and eventual clinical outcomes is unknown. … Supreme Court decision on DNA patents (122) would be a major advance in this field. … This information could improve patient decision making and lead to better health outcomes.
  8. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/6hyj7-3s6Qxs-brqhxPVxD
    June 06, 2017 - The decision to screen for colorectal cancer in adults aged 76 to85 years should be an individual one … Clinicians should understand the evidence but individualize decision making to the specific patient … The decision to screen for colorectal cancer in adults aged 76 to 85yearsshouldbean individualone, taking … Grade: A The decision to screen for colorectal cancer is an individual one. … AHRQ staff had no role in the approval of the final recommendation statement or the decision to submit
  9. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/sites/default/files/inline-files/hiv-prep-guide-2020_0.pdf
    January 01, 2020 - PrEP for HIV Prevention: Let's Talk About It PrEP for HIV Prevention Let’s Talk About It Talking about sex, drug use, and HIV protection with your healthcare provider may not be an easy conversation. But, the more you share, the better they can help you stay HIV-negative. Use this guide with your healthcare provi…
  10. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/lung-cancer-screening-december-2013
    December 31, 2013 - Clinicians should understand the evidence but individualize decision making to the specific patient or … The National Cancer Institute has developed a patient and physician guide for shared decision making … Shared Decision Making Shared decision making is important for persons within the population for whom … The decision to begin screening should be the result of a thorough discussion of the possible benefits
  11. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/breast-cancer-screening-2009
    December 15, 2009 - B Women, Before the Age of 50 Years The decision to start regular, biennial screening mammography … Aged 40-49 Years Women Aged 50-74 Years Women Aged ≥75 Years Recommendation Individualize decision … The Task Force encourages individualized, informed decision making about when to start mammography screening … USPSTF requested a report from the CISNET Breast Cancer Modeling Group to provide data from comparative decision … A decision analysis performed for the USPSTF projected that biennial screening produced 70% to 99% of
  12. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/asymptomatic-bacteriuria-in-adults-screening
    September 24, 2019 - Clinicians should understand the evidence but individualize decision making to the specific patient or … Clinicians should understand the evidence but individualize decision making to the specific patient or
  13. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/syphilis-infection-screening-1996
    January 01, 1996 - Syphilis tests in diagnostic and therapeutic decision making. … Syphilis tests in diagnostic and therapeutic decision making. In: Sox HC Jr, ed.
  14. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/anxiety-adults-screening
    June 20, 2023 - Clinicians should understand the evidence but individualize decision-making to the specific patient or … Clinicians should understand the evidence but individualize decision-making to the specific patient or … AHRQ staff had no role in the approval of the final recommendation statement or the decision to submit
  15. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/ClinicalSummaryFinal/abdominal-aortic-aneurysm-screening
    December 10, 2019 - Share to Facebook Share to X Share to WhatsApp Share to Email Print Clinical Summary Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Screening December 10, 2019 Recommendations made by the USPSTF are independent of the U.S. government. They should not be construed…
  16. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/RecommendationStatementFinal/hepatitis-b-virus-infection-screening
    December 15, 2020 - Development and validation of clinical decision support tools to help clinicians efficiently and accurately … Clinicians should understand the evidence but individualize decision-making to the specific patient or
  17. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/mx2Ko29RH46mTYb36f-UBe
    June 20, 2023 - Clinicians should understand the evidence but individualize decision-making to the specific patient … Clinicians should understand the evidence but individualize decision-making to the specific patient or … AHRQ staff had no role in the approval of the final recommendation statement or the decision to submit
  18. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/latent-tuberculosis-infection-screening
    May 02, 2023 - Clinicians should understand the evidence but individualize decision-making to the specific patient or … Clinicians should understand the evidence but individualize decision-making to the specific patient or … AHRQ staff had no role in the approval of the final recommendation statement or the decision to submit
  19. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/chlamydia-and-gonorrhea-screening
    September 14, 2021 - Clinicians should understand the evidence but individualize decision making to the specific patient or … AHRQ staff had no role in the approval of the final recommendation statement or the decision to submit … Clinicians should understand the evidence but individualize decision-making to the specific patient or
  20. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/sites/default/files/inline-files/rtc2016rev_2%20(3).pdf
    December 01, 2016 - (Grade B) The decision to initiate low-dose aspirin use for the primary prevention of CVD and CRC … (Grade B) The decision to start screening mammography in women prior to age 50 years should be an … (Grade A) The decision to screen for colorectal cancer in adults ages 76 to 85 years should be an … C Breast Cancer: Screening With Mammography in Women Ages 40 to 49 Years* The decision to start screening … C Colorectal Cancer: Screening in Adults Ages 76 to 85 Years The decision to screen for colorectal

Search the AHRQ Archive

Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.

Search Archive

Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site

You selected to view results for the following site: