-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/oral-health-children-adolescents-screening-preventive-interventions
November 07, 2023 - Clinicians should understand the evidence but individualize decision making to the specific patient or … Clinicians should understand the evidence but individualize decision-making to the specific patient or … AHRQ staff had no role in the approval of the final recommendation statement or the decision to submit
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/about-uspstf/methods-and-processes/current-processes-refining-evidence-based-recommendation-development
January 01, 2014 - The Task Force does not advocate for prevention, perform decision analysis to routinely standardize the … The Task Force views its role as a decision maker engaged in a deliberative process.
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/methods-and-processes/uspstf-analytic-framework-child-and-adolescent-health-topics
October 01, 2017 - USPSTF Analytic Framework for Child and Adolescent Health Topics
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to WhatsApp
Share to Email
Print
The USPSTF has developed a new way of approaching the evidence on preventive services for children and adoles…
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/sites/default/files/2025-03/uspstf-value-primary-care-fact-sheet-2025.pdf
January 01, 2025 - USPSTF: The Primary Care Clinician’s Source for Prevention Recommendations
’
USPSTF: The Primary Care Clinician’s Source
for Prevention Recommendations
What is the mission of the U.S. Preventive
Services Task …
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/2Wc3FRHpVDPX2jT_WzjEXX
July 31, 2020 - Clinicians should understand the evidence but individualize
decision-making to the specific patient or … In addition,
the USPSTF concluded that the decision to screen for colorectal can-
cer in adults aged … AHRQ staff had
no role in the approval of the final recommendation
statement or the decision to submit … Clinicians should understand the
evidence but individualize decision-making to the
specific patient or … Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Decision Analysis for
the US Preventive Services Task Force.
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/hEp2uYfD9KRhYTY5fGr8Tp
October 15, 2018 - Clinicians should understand the
evidence but individualize decision making to the specific patient
or … AHRQ staff had
no role in the approval of the final recommendation
statement or the decision to submit
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/3w8Wr9wwAyAqUJWmJo_bL-
February 01, 2014 - The investigators were solely responsible for
the content and the decision to submit the manuscript for … How-
ever, how and when the benefit–harm ratio shifts for
women facing this decision is uncertain. … How these factors influence patient decision making and
eventual clinical outcomes is unknown. … Supreme Court decision on DNA patents
(122) would be a major advance in this field. … This information could improve patient decision
making and lead to better health outcomes.
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/6hyj7-3s6Qxs-brqhxPVxD
June 06, 2017 - The
decision to screen for colorectal cancer in adults aged 76 to85 years should be an individual one … Clinicians should understand the
evidence but individualize decision making to the specific patient … The decision to screen for colorectal cancer in adults aged 76 to
85yearsshouldbean individualone, taking … Grade: A
The decision to screen for colorectal cancer is an individual one. … AHRQ staff had
no role in the approval of the final recommendation
statement or the decision to submit
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/sites/default/files/inline-files/hiv-prep-guide-2020_0.pdf
January 01, 2020 - PrEP for HIV Prevention: Let's Talk About It
PrEP for HIV Prevention
Let’s Talk About It
Talking about sex, drug use, and HIV protection with your healthcare provider may not
be an easy conversation. But, the more you share, the better they can help you stay
HIV-negative. Use this guide with your healthcare provi…
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/lung-cancer-screening-december-2013
December 31, 2013 - Clinicians should understand the evidence but individualize decision making to the specific patient or … The National Cancer Institute has developed a patient and physician guide for shared decision making … Shared Decision Making
Shared decision making is important for persons within the population for whom … The decision to begin screening should be the result of a thorough discussion of the possible benefits
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/breast-cancer-screening-2009
December 15, 2009 - B
Women, Before the Age of 50 Years
The decision to start regular, biennial screening mammography … Aged 40-49 Years
Women Aged 50-74 Years
Women Aged ≥75 Years
Recommendation
Individualize decision … The Task Force encourages individualized, informed decision making about when to start mammography screening … USPSTF requested a report from the CISNET Breast Cancer Modeling Group to provide data from comparative decision … A decision analysis performed for the USPSTF projected that biennial screening produced 70% to 99% of
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/asymptomatic-bacteriuria-in-adults-screening
September 24, 2019 - Clinicians should understand the evidence but individualize decision making to the specific patient or … Clinicians should understand the evidence but individualize decision making to the specific patient or
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/syphilis-infection-screening-1996
January 01, 1996 - Syphilis tests in diagnostic and therapeutic decision making. … Syphilis tests in diagnostic and therapeutic decision making. In: Sox HC Jr, ed.
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/anxiety-adults-screening
June 20, 2023 - Clinicians should understand the evidence but individualize decision-making to the specific patient or … Clinicians should understand the evidence but individualize decision-making to the specific patient or … AHRQ staff had no role in the approval of the final recommendation statement or the decision to submit
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/ClinicalSummaryFinal/abdominal-aortic-aneurysm-screening
December 10, 2019 - Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to WhatsApp
Share to Email
Print
Clinical Summary
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Screening
December 10, 2019
Recommendations made by the USPSTF are independent of the U.S. government. They should not be construed…
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/RecommendationStatementFinal/hepatitis-b-virus-infection-screening
December 15, 2020 - Development and validation of clinical decision support tools to help clinicians efficiently and accurately … Clinicians should understand the evidence but individualize decision-making to the specific patient or
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/mx2Ko29RH46mTYb36f-UBe
June 20, 2023 - Clinicians should understand the
evidence but individualize decision-making to the specific patient … Clinicians should understand the evidence but individualize
decision-making to the specific patient or … AHRQ staff had
no role in the approval of the final recommendation
statement or the decision to submit
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/latent-tuberculosis-infection-screening
May 02, 2023 - Clinicians should understand the evidence but individualize decision-making to the specific patient or … Clinicians should understand the evidence but individualize decision-making to the specific patient or … AHRQ staff had no role in the approval of the final recommendation statement or the decision to submit
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/chlamydia-and-gonorrhea-screening
September 14, 2021 - Clinicians should understand the evidence but individualize decision making to the specific patient or … AHRQ staff had no role in the approval of the final recommendation statement or the decision to submit … Clinicians should understand the evidence but individualize decision-making to the specific patient or
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/sites/default/files/inline-files/rtc2016rev_2%20(3).pdf
December 01, 2016 - (Grade B)
The decision to initiate low-dose aspirin use for the primary prevention of CVD and CRC … (Grade B)
The decision to start screening mammography in women prior to age 50 years should
be an … (Grade A)
The decision to screen for colorectal cancer in adults ages 76 to 85 years should be an … C
Breast Cancer: Screening With Mammography in Women Ages 40 to 49 Years*
The decision to start screening … C
Colorectal Cancer: Screening in Adults Ages 76 to 85 Years
The decision to screen for colorectal