-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/transcript_deliberativemethodswebinar.pdf
April 19, 2012 - short-term as a direct
result of the engagement and deliberation.
10
And, from here, you decide
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cancer-decision-support-tools_disposition-comments.pdf
December 23, 2014 - Disposition of Comments Report for Decision Aids for Cancer Screening and Treatment
Research Review Disposition of Comments Report
Research Review Title: Decision Aids for Cancer Screening and Treatment
Draft review available for public comment from July 10, 2014 to August 7, 2014.
Research Review Citation: Tr…
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/prostate-cancer-therapies-update_disposition-comments.pdf
December 16, 2014 - Disposition of Comments for Comparative Effectiveness of Therapies for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: An Update of a 2008 Systematic Review
Comparative Effectiveness Review Disposition of Comments Report
Research Review Title: Comparative Effectiveness of Therapies for Clinically Localized
Prostat…
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/deliberative-methods-how-to-webinar-text-only.pdf
December 06, 2011 - Slide 20
Deliberative method for prioritization of interventions
Issue: How would you decide which
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/deliberative-methods-how-to-webinar-text-only.pdf
December 06, 2011 - Slide 20
Deliberative method for prioritization of interventions
Issue: How would you decide which
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/outcome-definition-and-measurement-chapter-6.pptx
January 01, 2013 - Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research: A User’s Guide, which was developed by the Outcome DEcIDE
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/methods-guidance-tests-prognostic_methods.pdf
July 01, 2012 - At this time, reviewers
will need to decide which of these general criteria or others are appropriate
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/ptsd-dispositIon-comments-2022.pdf
January 01, 2022 - This is of real importance and value to the
evidence synthesis community who need to decide how to
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/antiplatelet-treatment_disposition-comments.pdf
September 25, 2013 - adequate period of time, undergo phenotypic testing for platelet
reactivity and use the results to decide … appropriate amount of time, undergo phenotypic testing for
platelet reactivity and use the test results to decide
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/organization-cancer-care-disposition-comments.pdf
June 20, 2023 - Framework, this section seemed to say
that was beyond their mission and that it is up to others to decide
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/methods-report-translation-c-diff-treatment-clinical-pathway.pdf
November 01, 2019 - How to
decide whether a clinical practice guideline is
trustworthy.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/vte-prophyalaxis_disposition-comments.pdf
May 29, 2013 - In the face of perfect evidence,
doctors and hospital improvement teams still have to decide what to
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/biorepositories-registries-guide-3rd-ed-addendum-white-paper.pdf
February 01, 2018 - (Prepared by the Outcome
DEcIDE Center [Outcome Sciences, Inc., a
Quintiles company] under Contract
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cer-264-maternal-morbidity-mortality-disposition-comments.pdf
December 21, 2023 - qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in
psychology should researchers decide
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/undescended-testicle_research-protocol.pdf
September 02, 2011 - Evidence-based Practice Center Systematic Review Protocol
1
Source: www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov
Published Online: September 2, 2011
Evidence-based Practice Center Systematic Review Protocol
Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments for Cryptorchidism
I. Background and Objectives for the Systemati…
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/rapid-assessment-research-updates_research.pdf
September 15, 2008 - Updating Current Effectiveness Reviews
Assessment of the Need to Update Comparative Effectiveness
Reviews:
Report of an Initial Rapid Program Assessment (2005-2009)
Prepared for:
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
540 Gaither Road
Rockville, MD 20850…
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/hepatitis-c_research-protocol.pdf
November 30, 2011 - Evidence-based Practice Center Systematic Review Protocol
Source: www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov
Published Online: November 30, 2011 1
Evidence-based Practice Center Systematic Review Protocol
Project Title: Comparative Effectiveness of Treatment for Hepatitis C in Adults
I. Background and Obj…
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/cesarean-birth-2010_research-protocol.pdf
January 01, 2010 - Evidence-based Practice Center Systematic Review Protocol
Source: www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov
Published Online: May 6, 2011
Evidence-based Practice Center Systematic Review Protocol
Project Title: Strategies To Reduce Cesarean
I. Background and Objectives for the Systematic Review
Recent rep…
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/glaucoma-treatment_research-protocol.pdf
November 16, 2010 - Source: www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov
Published Online: November 16, 2010
Evidence-based Practice Center Systematic Review Protocol
Project Title: Comparative Effectiveness of Treatment for Open-Angle Glaucoma
I. Background and Objectives for the Systematic Review
The Agency for Healthcare Research and…
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/assessing-the-risk-of-bias-in-systematic-reviews-of-health-care-interventions-01_0.pdf
May 01, 2005 - For example, when reviewers decide which risk-of-bias items to use, they are
attempting to capture the … comprehensiveness of reporting.a
Reporting the Risk of Bias
During the protocol phase, reviewers should decide