-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/kid/tools/stats/PublicSummaryStats_KID_2006_Core.PDF
January 01, 2006 - Missing
Obs
. 57201 1.83 99.99
A 5 0.00 0.01
Total 57206 1.83 100.00
The Tabulate Procedure
Cross-tabular
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nrd/stats/NRD_2010_MaskedStats_Core_V2.PDF
January 01, 2010 - 1.99842
25% Q1 1.70028
10% 1.56215
5% 1.51395
1% 1.13619
0% Min 1.03812
The Tabulate Procedure
Cross-tabular
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/kid/kid_2009_introduction.jsp
January 01, 2009 - variance calculations are based on finite-sample theory, which is an appropriate method for obtaining cross-sectional … In addition to these subroutines, standard errors can be estimated by validation and cross-validation … For example, tenfold cross-validation would split the data into ten equal-sized subsets. … , Blue Cross PPO, (4) commercial, PPO, (5) HMO, PHP, etc., (6) self-pay, (7) no charge, (8) Title V, … , Blue Cross PPO, (4) commercial, PPO, (5) HMO, PHP, etc., (6) self-pay, (7) no charge, (8) Title V,
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/tools/stats/NIS_2011_MaskedStats_Core.PDF
January 01, 2011 - 50% Median 4.62855
25% Q1 4.53879
10% 4.50744
5% 4.32822
1% 3.58309
0% Min 3.09199
Tabulate
Cross-tabular
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/kid/tools/stats/KID_2009_MaskedStats_Core.PDF
January 01, 2009 - 1.42735
25% Q1 1.32916
10% 1.29275
5% 1.24326
1% 1.22110
0% Min 1.06711
The Tabulate Procedure
Cross-tabular
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/trendtables/HCUPSummaryTrendTables_Methods.xlsx
December 01, 2022 - .
- Some diagnosis codes are cross classified into more than one category because individual codes can … 2015 through the current fiscal year are mapped to a clinical category.
- Some diagnosis codes are cross
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/NIS_Introduction_2017.jsp
January 01, 2017 - variance calculations are based on finite-sample theory, which is an appropriate method for obtaining cross-sectional … In addition to these subroutines, standard errors can be estimated by validation and cross-validation … If the analytic file is too small to set aside a large validation sample, cross-validation techniques … For example, ten-fold cross-validation would split the data into ten subsets of equal size.
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/neds/NEDS_Introduction_2016.jsp
January 01, 2016 - variance calculations are based on finite-sample theory, which is an appropriate method for obtaining cross-sectional … In addition to these subroutines, standard errors can be estimated by validation and cross-validation … If the analytic file is too small to set aside a large validation sample, cross-validation techniques … For example, ten-fold cross-validation would split the data into 10 subsets of equal size.
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/NIS_Introduction_2016.jsp
January 01, 2016 - variance calculations are based on finite-sample theory, which is an appropriate method for obtaining cross-sectional … In addition to these subroutines, standard errors can be estimated by validation and cross-validation … If the analytic file is too small to set aside a large validation sample, cross-validation techniques … For example, ten-fold cross-validation would split the data into ten subsets of equal size.
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/tools/stats/MaskedStats_NIS_2019_Core_V2.PDF
January 01, 2019 - Quantile
50% Median 5.00
25% Q1 5.00
10% 5.00
5% 5.00
1% 5.00
0% Min 5.00
The Tabulate Procedure
Cross-tabular
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/tools/stats/NIS_1999_SummaryStats.PDF
January 01, 1999 - Quantiles (Definition 5)
Quantile Estimate
1% 2.96883
0% Min 2.89538
The Tabulate Procedure
Cross-tabular
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/tools/stats/NIS_1998_SummaryStats.PDF
January 01, 1998 - Quantiles (Definition 5)
Quantile Estimate
1% 3.82940
0% Min 3.06346
The Tabulate Procedure
Cross-tabular
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nrd/stats/NRD_2014_MaskedStats_Core.PDF
January 01, 2014 - 1.91049
25% Q1 1.58348
10% 1.40201
5% 1.34115
1% 1.10818
0% Min 1.03088
The Tabulate Procedure
Cross-tabular
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/tools/stats/NIS_1999_SummaryStats_CORE10B.PDF
January 01, 1999 - Missing
Obs
. 18697 2.60 99.99
A 1 0.00 0.01
Total 18698 2.60 100.00
The Tabulate Procedure
Cross-tabular
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/tools/stats/NIS_1998_SummaryStats_CORE10B.PDF
January 01, 1998 - Missing
Obs
. 14113 2.07 99.96
A 6 0.00 0.04
Total 14119 2.07 100.00
The Tabulate Procedure
Cross-tabular
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/tools/stats/NIS_1998_SummaryStats_CORE10A.PDF
January 01, 1998 - Missing
Obs
. 14130 2.07 99.96
A 6 0.00 0.04
Total 14136 2.07 100.00
The Tabulate Procedure
Cross-tabular
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/tools/stats/NIS_1999_SummaryStats_CORE10A.pdf
January 01, 1999 - Percent Of
Missing
Value Count All Obs
Missing
Obs
. 18628 2.59 100.00
The Tabulate Procedure
Cross-tabular
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/tools/stats/NIS_2014_MaskedStats_Core.PDF
January 01, 2014 - 5.00000
25% Q1 4.99999
10% 4.99997
5% 4.99992
1% 4.99973
0% Min 4.99560
The Tabulate Procedure
Cross-tabular
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/methods/2019-04.pdf
January 01, 2019 - ZIP Codes cross
1 In data year 2017, two Partners determined the county based on the complete patient
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/tools/stats/NIS_2013_MaskedStats_Core.PDF
January 01, 2013 - 5.00000
25% Q1 4.99999
10% 4.99995
5% 4.99991
1% 4.99974
0% Min 4.99491
The Tabulate Procedure
Cross-tabular