Results

Total Results: 663 records

Showing results for "cross sectional".

  1. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/neds/stats/NEDS_2021_Core_MaskedStats.PDF
    January 01, 2021 - 1532281 5.09 96.10 C 62142 0.21 3.90 Total 1594423 5.30 100.00 Means of Continuous Data Elements Cross-tabular
  2. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/neds/stats/NEDS_2015Q4_ED_MaskedStats.PDF
    December 14, 2017 - 185,295 2.84 13 133,795 2.05 14 111,908 1.71 15 604,170 9.25 Means of Continuous Data Elements Cross-tabular
  3. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/neds/stats/NEDS_2020_ED_MaskedStats.PDF
    January 01, 2020 - 30,661 0.13 33 26,562 0.11 34 23,819 0.10 35 272,167 1.16 Means of Continuous Data Elements Cross-tabular
  4. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/neds/stats/NEDS_2006_MaskedStats_Hospital.PDF
    January 01, 2006 - 38340.0 50% Median 21024.5 25% Q1 9088.0 10% 3052.0 5% 1412.0 1% 350.0 0% Min 10.0 Tabulate Cross-tabular
  5. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/neds/stats/NEDS_2006v2_MaskedStats_Hospital.PDF
    April 08, 2010 - 56560 75% Q3 38731 50% Median 21018 25% Q1 9022 10% 3052 5% 1412 1% 350 0% Min 10 Tabulate Cross-tabular
  6. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/reports/NIS_2002_Design_Report.jsp
    January 01, 2002 - variance calculations are based on finite-sample theory, which is an appropriate method for obtaining cross-sectional … In addition to these subroutines, standard errors can be estimated by validation and cross-validation … If the analytic file is too small to set aside a large validation sample, cross-validation techniques … For example, tenfold cross-validation would split the data into ten equal-sized subsets. … Further, the sample weights were developed as annual, cross-sectional weights, rather than longitudinal
  7. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/reports/NIS_2001_Design_Report.jsp
    January 01, 2001 - variance calculations are based on finite-sample theory, which is an appropriate method for obtaining cross-sectional … In addition to these subroutines, standard errors can be estimated by validation and cross-validation … If the analytical file is too small to set aside a large validation sample, cross-validation techniques … For example, tenfold cross-validation would split the data into ten equal-sized subsets. … Further, the sample weights were developed as annual, cross-sectional weights rather than longitudinal
  8. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/kid/tools/stats/KID_2019_MaskedStats_Hospital_V2.PDF
    January 01, 2019 - Median 1,181.00 25% Q1 585.00 10% 308.00 5% 144.00 1% 42.00 0% Min 5.00 The Tabulate Procedure Cross-tabular
  9. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/methods/2003_02.pdf
    January 01, 2003 - In addition to the methods shown in this report, standard errors can be estimated by validation and cross-validation … If the analytical file is too small to set aside a large validation sample, cross-validation techniques … For example, tenfold cross-validation would split the data into ten equal-sized subsets. … Further, the sample weights were developed as annual, cross- sectional weights rather than longitudinal … odds ratios, relative risks, and their standard errors (or confidence intervals) for user-specified cross-tabulations
  10. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/methods/2003_02.jsp
    January 01, 2003 - In addition to the methods shown in this report, standard errors can be estimated by validation and cross-validation … If the analytical file is too small to set aside a large validation sample, cross-validation techniques … For example, tenfold cross-validation would split the data into ten equal-sized subsets. … Further, the sample weights were developed as annual, cross-sectional weights rather than longitudinal … odds ratios, relative risks, and their standard errors (or confidence intervals) for user-specified cross-tabulations
  11. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/tools/stats/NIS_1990_SummaryStats_Nis90wt.PDF
    July 14, 2005 - Percent Of Missing Value Count All Obs Missing Obs . 10 1.15 100.00 The Tabulate Procedure Cross-tabular
  12. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/tools/stats/NIS_1988_SummaryStats_Nis88wt.PDF
    July 14, 2005 - Values Percent Of Missing Value Count All Obs Missing Obs . 1 0.13 100.00 The Tabulate Procedure Cross-tabular
  13. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/tools/stats/NIS_1989_SummaryStats_Nis89wt.PDF
    July 14, 2005 - Values Percent Of Missing Value Count All Obs Missing Obs . 7 0.79 100.00 The Tabulate Procedure Cross-tabular
  14. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/tools/stats/NIS_1992_SummaryStats_Nis92wt.PDF
    January 01, 1992 - Percent Of Missing Value Count All Obs Missing Obs . 18 2.10 100.00 The Tabulate Procedure Cross-tabular
  15. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/tools/stats/NIS_1991_SummaryStats_Nis91wt.PDF
    January 01, 1991 - Percent Of Missing Value Count All Obs Missing Obs . 12 1.40 100.00 The Tabulate Procedure Cross-tabular
  16. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/tools/stats/NIS_2006_MaskedStats_Hospital.PDF
    January 01, 2006 - 90% 54 75% Q3 32 50% Median 20 25% Q1 14 10% 10 5% 9 1% 5 0% Min 3 The Tabulate Procedure Cross-tabular
  17. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/neds/stats/NEDS_2007_MaskedStats_Hospital.PDF
    January 01, 2007 - 5) Quantile Estimate 10% 3199 5% 1523 1% 722 0% Min 197 Means of Continuous Data Elements Cross-tabular
  18. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/neds/stats/NEDS_2017_Hospital_MaskedStats.PDF
    January 01, 2017 - 23181.0 25% Q1 8127.5 10% 2636.0 5% 1125.0 1% 178.0 0% Min 1.0 Means of Continuous Data Elements Cross-tabular
  19. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/neds/stats/NEDS_2012_MaskedStats_Hospital.PDF
    January 01, 2012 - Quantile Estimate 10% 3119.5 5% 1588.0 1% 479.0 0% Min 48.0 Means of Continuous Data Elements Cross-tabular
  20. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/neds/stats/NEDS_2011_MaskedStats_Hospital.PDF
    January 01, 2011 - Definition 5) Quantile Estimate 10% 3245 5% 1705 1% 430 0% Min 40 Means of Continuous Data Elements Cross-tabular

Search the AHRQ Archive

Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.

Search Archive

Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site

You selected to view results for the following site: