Results

Total Results: 1,993 records

Showing results for "considering".

81. celiac-disease-protocol-140612 (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/celiac-disease_research-protocol.pdf
    June 12, 2014 - Existing reviews that we are considering including (in total or in part) as evidence will be assessed

82. Cer-235-Pharma-Nonpharm-Ptsd-Update-Appendix-G-1 (xls file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cer-235-pharma-nonpharm-ptsd-update-appendix-g-1.xlsx
    May 29, 2025 - G-1. Additions to ROB Template Table G-2. Additions to risk of bias template Rater Author, Year Selection Bias Domain: Randomization Adequate? Selection Bias Domain: Allocation Concealment Adequate? Selection Bias Domain: Groups Similar at Baseline? Selection Bias Domain: ITT Analysis? Performance Bias Domain: Care P…

83. Medical Therapies for Locally Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/gastric-cancers-protocol.pdf
    January 01, 2024 - In considering network meta-analysis, we will evaluate how these factors are distributed across direct

84. Evidence-based Practice Center Systematic Review Protocol (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/high-cholestorol-medications_disposition-comments.pdf
    March 10, 2010 - It is too simplistic and not considering the research question, clinical and methodological diversity … substantial heterogeneity needs explanation, but lack of explanation should not diminish its impact when considering

85. Prioritization and Selection of Harms for Inclusion in Systematic Reviews (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/ehc-presentation-selection-harms-systematic-reviews.pdf
    February 01, 2018 - Prioritization and Selection of Harms for Inclusion in Systematic Reviews Prioritization and Selection of Harms for Inclusion in Systematic Reviews Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods Guide www.ahrq.gov Presenter Presentation Notes P…

86. Horizon Scanning Protocol and Operations Manual January 2013 Revision (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/ahrq-healthcare-horizon-scan-protocol-operations-manual_130826.pdf
    August 01, 2013 - The horizon scanning team operationalizes this definition by considering interventions in the context … We also provide below reasons why these questions are asked and answered when considering whether a … While considering the presentations, team members and any guest attendees with subject matter expertise … ask experts for their opinions about patient acceptance or adoption of an intervention, we are also considering … These parameters are intended to serve as anchoring points for considering the overall potential impact

87. Disposition of Comments for Technical Brief 25 Disparities within Serious Mental Illness (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/mental-illness-disparities_disposition-comments.pdf
    May 26, 2016 - need to keep the scope of this project focused on disparities within the SMI population, rather than considering

88. Protocol: Imaging for Pretreatment Staging of Small Cell Lung Cancer (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/lung-cancer-staging_research-protocol.pdf
    December 08, 2014 - In considering the applicability of the findings to patients, we will consult large studies to ascertain

89. Evidence-based Practice Center Systematic Review Protocol (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/diabetes-update-2015_disposition-comments.pdf
    January 01, 2015 - - eg. page 35, line 28-29 'surprisingly' ; page 36 line 19-20 'this is especially important when considering

90. Ch 4-User-Guide-To-Ocer 130129 (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/ch_4-user-guide-to-ocer_130129.pdf
    January 01, 2010 - 45 Abstract Characterization of exposure is a central issue in the analysis of observational data; however, no “one size fits all” solution exists for exposure measurement. In this chapter, we discuss potential exposure measurement approaches for observational comparative effectiveness research (CER). First, it is …

91. Meta-analysis of Test Performance Evidence When There is a “Gold Standard” Reference Standard (ppt file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/medical-test-reviews-meta-analysis.ppt
    June 01, 2012 - three-step algorithm is recommended for meta-analyzing studies with a gold standard reference: Start by considering … Step 1: Start by Considering Sensitivity and Specificity Separately (1 of 2) Trikalinos TA, Coleman CI … Step 1: Start by Considering Sensitivity and Specificity Separately (1 of 2) Step one involves considering … example of a receiver operator characteristic graph with the shoulder-and-arm pattern Step 1: Start by Considering … Step 1: Start by Considering Sensitivity and Specificity Separately (2 of 2) The top figure in this slide

92. Meta-analysis of Test Performance Evidence When There is a “Gold Standard” Reference Standard (ppt file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/medical-test-reviews-meta-analysis.ppt
    June 01, 2012 - three-step algorithm is recommended for meta-analyzing studies with a gold standard reference: Start by considering … Step 1: Start by Considering Sensitivity and Specificity Separately (1 of 2) Trikalinos TA, Coleman CI … Step 1: Start by Considering Sensitivity and Specificity Separately (1 of 2) Step one involves considering … example of a receiver operator characteristic graph with the shoulder-and-arm pattern Step 1: Start by Considering … Step 1: Start by Considering Sensitivity and Specificity Separately (2 of 2) The top figure in this slide

93. Disposition of Comments: Comparative Effectiveness Review 235_Pharmacologic and Nonpharmacologic Treatments for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: An Update of the PTSD-Repository Evidence Base (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/ptsd-comments.pdf
    November 04, 2020 - The database authors are also considering adding new items to the tool and this approach would help … You state that you are considering a five category RoB score. … context for the PTSD repository existence is important in and of itself, readers may benefit from considering

94. Medical Therapies for Locally Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/gastric-cancers-protocol-amended.pdf
    February 07, 2025 - In considering network meta-analysis, we will evaluate how these factors are distributed across direct

95. Total Worker Health® (TWH) (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/worker-health_executive.pdf
    April 01, 2016 - transportation, communications industries, health care) is underrepresented in included studies when considering

96. Disposition of Comments for CER 177 Agitation Aggression Dementia (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/dementia-agitation-aggression_disposition-comments.pdf
    March 21, 2016 - In considering the interventions used most have been successful with certain SNF residents. … the ultimate goal of bringing the person back in line with what WE feel is best for him either not considering

97. Horizon Scanning Protocol and Operations Manual September 2015 Revision (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/ahrq-healthcare-horizon-scan-protocol-operations-manual-151001.pdf
    September 01, 2015 - The Horizon Scanning team operationalizes this definition by considering interventions in the context … We also provide below reasons why we ask and answer these questions when considering whether a lead … While considering the presentations at topic nomination meetings, team members and any guest attendees … For example, in considering a new cardiac valve in development for a new clinical indication, we considered … These parameters are intended to serve as anchoring points for considering the overall potential impact

98. Horizon Scanning Protocol and Operations Manual September 2015 Revision (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/ahrq-healthcare-horizon-scan-protocol-operations-manual-151001.pdf
    September 01, 2015 - The Horizon Scanning team operationalizes this definition by considering interventions in the context … We also provide below reasons why we ask and answer these questions when considering whether a lead … While considering the presentations at topic nomination meetings, team members and any guest attendees … For example, in considering a new cardiac valve in development for a new clinical indication, we considered … These parameters are intended to serve as anchoring points for considering the overall potential impact

99. Treatments for Fecal Incontinence: A Review of the Research for Adults (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/fecal-incontinence_consumer.pdf
    July 01, 2016 - Treatments for Fecal Incontinence: A Review of the Research for Adults Treatments for Fecal Incontinence A Review of the Research for Adults e Archived: This report is greater than 3 years old. Findings may be used for research purposes, but should not be considered current …

100. Medical Therapies for Locally Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma (pdf file)
     effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/gastric-cancers-protocol-amendment.pdf
     May 02, 2025 - In considering network meta-analysis, we will evaluate how these factors are distributed across direct