Results

Total Results: over 10,000 records

Showing results for "conclusion".

  1. ce.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/what-we-learned/final-report/section5.html
    October 01, 2015 - Conclusion and Summary SHARE: … Conclusion and Summary Previous Page Next Page Table of Contents National Evaluation … Conclusion and Summary 6. References and Notes Appendix A. … Conclusion and Summary. Content last reviewed October 2015.
  2. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/glaucoma-screening_surveillance.pdf
    January 01, 2013 - as still valid, we classified the CER conclusion as still valid … experts assessed the CER conclusion as having new evidence that 3 might change the conclusion … , then we classified the CER conclusion as possibly out of date … responding experts assessed the CER conclusion as having new evidence that might change the conclusion … we classified the CER conclusion as out of date.
  3. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/glaucoma-screening_surveillance.pdf
    January 01, 2013 - as still valid, we classified the CER conclusion as still valid … experts assessed the CER conclusion as having new evidence that 3 might change the conclusion … , then we classified the CER conclusion as possibly out of date … responding experts assessed the CER conclusion as having new evidence that might change the conclusion … we classified the CER conclusion as out of date.
  4. www.ahrq.gov/diagnostic-safety/resources/issue-briefs/dxsafety-test-result-communication6.html
    July 01, 2024 - Electronic Test Result Communication in the Era of the 21st Century Cures Act Conclusions Previous Page Next Page Table of Contents Electronic Test Result Communication in the Era of the 21st Century Cures Act Introduction Methods Results Discussion Conclusions References Appendix A. D…
  5. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/glaucoma-treatment_surveillance.pdf
    January 01, 2013 - experts assessed the CER conclusion as having new evidence that might change the conclusion, then … we classified the CER conclusion as possibly out of date … responding experts assessed the CER conclusion as having new evidence that might change the conclusion … classified the CER conclusion as out of date. … See responses to KQ 6. 2 reviewers stated the conclusion is still supported by the Original conclusion
  6. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/glaucoma-treatment_surveillance.pdf
    January 01, 2013 - experts assessed the CER conclusion as having new evidence that might change the conclusion, then … we classified the CER conclusion as possibly out of date … responding experts assessed the CER conclusion as having new evidence that might change the conclusion … classified the CER conclusion as out of date. … See responses to KQ 6. 2 reviewers stated the conclusion is still supported by the Original conclusion
  7. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/phenylketonuria_surveillance.pdf
    January 15, 2013 - as still valid, we classified the CER conclusion as still valid … experts assessed the CER conclusion as having new evidence that might change the conclusion, then we … that might change the CER conclusion, and/or a majority of responding experts assessed the CER conclusion … as having new evidence that might change the conclusion, then we classified the CER conclusion as probably … we classified the CER conclusion as out of date.
  8. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/phenylketonuria_surveillance.pdf
    January 15, 2013 - as still valid, we classified the CER conclusion as still valid … experts assessed the CER conclusion as having new evidence that might change the conclusion, then we … that might change the CER conclusion, and/or a majority of responding experts assessed the CER conclusion … as having new evidence that might change the conclusion, then we classified the CER conclusion as probably … we classified the CER conclusion as out of date.
  9. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cad-pci-bypass_surveillance.pdf
    May 01, 2013 - that might change the CER conclusion, and /or a minority of responding experts assessed the CER conclusion … as having new evidence that might change the conclusion, then we classified the CER conclusion as possibly … responding experts assessed the CER conclusion as having new evidence that might change the conclusion … , then we classified the CER conclusion as probably out of date … we classified the CER conclusion as out of date.
  10. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cad-pci-bypass_surveillance.pdf
    May 01, 2013 - that might change the CER conclusion, and /or a minority of responding experts assessed the CER conclusion … as having new evidence that might change the conclusion, then we classified the CER conclusion as possibly … responding experts assessed the CER conclusion as having new evidence that might change the conclusion … , then we classified the CER conclusion as probably out of date … we classified the CER conclusion as out of date.
  11. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/tx-for-localized-prostate-cancer_surveillanceassesment_20120614.pdf
    May 01, 2012 - experts assessed the CER conclusion as having new evidence that might change the conclusion, then we … classified the CER conclusion as possibly out of date … conclusion, then we classified the CER conclusion as probably out of date … we classified the CER conclusion as out of date. … Original conclusion is out of date.
  12. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/tx-for-localized-prostate-cancer_surveillanceassesment_20120614.pdf
    May 01, 2012 - experts assessed the CER conclusion as having new evidence that might change the conclusion, then we … classified the CER conclusion as possibly out of date … conclusion, then we classified the CER conclusion as probably out of date … we classified the CER conclusion as out of date. … Original conclusion is out of date.
  13. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/tx-for-localized-prostate-cancer_surveillanceassesment_20120614.pdf
    May 01, 2012 - experts assessed the CER conclusion as having new evidence that might change the conclusion, then we … classified the CER conclusion as possibly out of date … conclusion, then we classified the CER conclusion as probably out of date … we classified the CER conclusion as out of date. … Original conclusion is out of date.
  14. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/tx-for-localized-prostate-cancer_surveillanceassesment_20120614.pdf
    May 01, 2012 - experts assessed the CER conclusion as having new evidence that might change the conclusion, then we … classified the CER conclusion as possibly out of date … conclusion, then we classified the CER conclusion as probably out of date … we classified the CER conclusion as out of date. … Original conclusion is out of date.
  15. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/arthritis-psoriatric_surveillance.pdf
    March 01, 2013 - that might change the CER conclusion, and /or a minority of responding experts assessed the CER conclusion … as having new evidence that might change the conclusion, then we classified the CER conclusion as possibly … responding experts assessed the CER conclusion as having new evidence that might change the conclusion … we classified the CER conclusion as out of date. … One expert did not know Conclusion is up to date.
  16. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/arthritis-psoriatric_surveillance.pdf
    March 01, 2013 - that might change the CER conclusion, and /or a minority of responding experts assessed the CER conclusion … as having new evidence that might change the conclusion, then we classified the CER conclusion as possibly … responding experts assessed the CER conclusion as having new evidence that might change the conclusion … we classified the CER conclusion as out of date. … One expert did not know Conclusion is up to date.
  17. Layout 1 (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/breast-biopsy-executive.pdf
    December 01, 2009 - conclusion possible Lesion characteristics Palpable vs. nonpalpable Insufficient No conclusion possible … Insufficient No conclusion possible masses Distortions vs. masses Insufficient No conclusion possible … conclusion possible Lesion characteristics Palpable vs. nonpalpable Insufficient No conclusion possible … Insufficient No conclusion possible masses Distortions vs. masses Insufficient No conclusion possible … Insufficient No conclusion possible factors Training of operator Insufficient No conclusion possible
  18. Layout 1 (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/breast-biopsy-executive.pdf
    December 01, 2009 - conclusion possible Lesion characteristics Palpable vs. nonpalpable Insufficient No conclusion possible … Insufficient No conclusion possible masses Distortions vs. masses Insufficient No conclusion possible … conclusion possible Lesion characteristics Palpable vs. nonpalpable Insufficient No conclusion possible … Insufficient No conclusion possible masses Distortions vs. masses Insufficient No conclusion possible … Insufficient No conclusion possible factors Training of operator Insufficient No conclusion possible
  19. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/rapid-assessment-research-updates_research.pdf
    September 15, 2008 - as still valid, we classified the CER conclusion as still valid … experts assessed the CER conclusion as having new evidence that might change the conclusion, then we … classified the CER conclusion as possibly out of date … responding experts assessed the CER conclusion as having new evidence that might change the conclusion … the CER conclusion as out of date.
  20. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/rapid-assessment-research-updates_research.pdf
    September 15, 2008 - as still valid, we classified the CER conclusion as still valid … experts assessed the CER conclusion as having new evidence that might change the conclusion, then we … classified the CER conclusion as possibly out of date … responding experts assessed the CER conclusion as having new evidence that might change the conclusion … the CER conclusion as out of date.