Results

Total Results: 2,381 records

Showing results for "conclusion".

  1. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/musculoskeletal-complaints-tests-children_disposition-comments.pdf
    March 07, 2012 - At the conclusion of the public comment period, authors use the commentators’ submissions and comments … We have revised our tables and conclusion to reflect this. … Peer Reviewer #4 Discussion/Conclusion The explanation of the report's limitations, especially when … Peer Reviewer #5 Discussion/Conclusion I found the summary and discussion very repetitive of the … Peer Reviewer #5 Discussion/Conclusion Future research.
  2. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cancer-pancreas_executive.pdf
    September 01, 2014 - If the evidence was sufficient to permit a conclusion, then the grade was high, moderate, or low. … Another conclusion involved the comparison between MDCT and MRI with respect to diagnostic accuracy, … One conclusion, based on one study, involved the superiority in T-stage accuracy of EUS-FNA over MDCT … Another conclusion, based on three studies, was the similarity in the accuracy of the assessment of … The third conclusion, based on two studies, was that PET/CT is more accurate in assessing distant
  3. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/urinary-incontinence-treatment_surveillance.pdf
    October 29, 2012 - experts assessed the CER conclusion as having new evidence that might change the conclusion, then we … classified the CER conclusion as possibly out of date … responding experts assessed the CER conclusion as having new evidence that might change the conclusion … , then we classified the CER conclusion as probably out of date … we classified the CER conclusion as out of date.
  4. Untitled (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/heart-disease-ace-inhibitor-arb_surveillance.pdf
    July 06, 2015 - Original conclusion is out of date. … as still valid, we classified the CER conclusion as likely current … experts assessed the CER conclusion as having new evidence that might change the conclusion, then we … classified the CER conclusion as possibly not current … the CER conclusion as out of date.
  5. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/bladder-cancer-non-muscle-invasive_disposition-comments.pdf
    October 27, 2015 - At the conclusion of the public comment period, authors use the commentators’ submissions and comments … TEP Reviewer #4 Results yes Noted TEP Reviewer #4 Discussion/ Conclusion Yes Noted. … Peer Reviewer #2 Discussion/ Conclusion The discussion and conclusions are well done. … Peer Reviewer #3 Discussion/ Conclusion Appropriate Noted. … Peer Reviewer #5 Discussion/ Conclusion Minor Edits: 1. Page 216, line 41.
  6. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/products/cancer-pancreas/research
    December 01, 2019 - (e.g., determination of metastases), we determined whether the evidence was sufficient to permit a conclusion … of a difference, a conclusion of similar accuracy, or neither (i.e., insufficient).
  7. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/binge-eating-disposition-160504.pdf
    December 09, 2015 - At the conclusion of the public comment period, authors use the commentators’ submissions and comments … Thank you 110 Peer Reviewer #2 Discussion/ Conclusion When discussing potential risk of harm from … We have added this study during the peer review period. 117 Peer Reviewer #4 Discussion/ Conclusion … Thank you 119 Peer Reviewer #6 Discussion/ Conclusion The future research section is clear and … We have added the following statement to the Conclusion.
  8. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/back-pain-treatment_disposition-comments.pdf
    February 29, 2016 - Results Public Reviewer Andrew Engel Please consider revising your conclusion. … Discussion/ Conclusion TEP Reviewer #3 n/a Noted Discussion/ Conclusion TEP Reviewer #4 … Discussion/ Conclusion TEP Reviewer #6 See above. Thank you for the comment. … Discussion/ Conclusion Peer Reviewer #4 Discussion/ Conclusion: This discussion/conclusion is … Spine 2013 11387 pg. 540548 Conclusion I don’t agree with your conclusion that there is only moderate
  9. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/gout-management-disposition-160721.pdf
    March 15, 2016 - TEP Reviewer #2 Discussion/ Conclusion 4. … TEP Reviewer #2 Discussion/ Conclusion 6. … Peer Reviewer #3 Discussion/ Conclusion yes Thank you TEP Reviewer #3 Discussion/ Conclusion The … TEP Reviewer #6 Discussion/ Conclusion 2. … TEP Reviewer #6 Discussion/ Conclusion 3.
  10. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/traumatic-brain-injury-rehabilitation-surveillance-160902.pdf
    September 02, 2016 - "" " •" Original"conclusion"is"out"of"date."" … ,"we"classified"the"systematic" review"conclusion"as"likely"current."" •" If"we"found"some"new"evidence"that"might"change"the"systematic"review"conclusion … ," and"/or"a"minority"of"responding"experts"assessed"the"systematic"review"conclusion"as" having"new"evidence"that"might"change"the"conclusion … ,"then"we"classified"the" systematic"review"conclusion"as"possibly"not"current."" •" If"we"found"new"evidence"that"rendered"the"systematic"review"conclusion"out"of"date"or … " no"longer"applicable,"we"classified"the"systematic"review"conclusion"as"out"of"date."
  11. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/cer-238-cervical-ripening-outpatient-setting-comments.pdf
    March 22, 2021 - At the conclusion of the public comment period, authors use the commentators’ comments to revise the … statements, especially the statement about no studies on fetal surveillance, do not support the conclusion … The recommendations for changes include changing the conclusion to state that fetal safety is unknown … Further, the conclusion should reflect that there is no evidence of fetal safety due to the lack of … The conclusion should be more multicenter RCTs should be done to evaluate safety.
  12. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/renal-cancer_disposition-comments.pdf
    February 24, 2016 - TEP #2 Discussion/Conclusion Good points. … TEP #3 Discussion/Conclusion The discussion section is well written. … TEP #4 Discussion/Conclusion Implications are clearly stated; no changes. … Peer Reviewer #1 Discussion/Conclusion Page 13 ES. … Peer Reviewer #2 Discussion/Conclusion The Discussion is clear and concise.
  13. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/nephropathy-contrast-induced_disposition-comments.pdf
    January 07, 2016 - At the conclusion of the public comment period, authors use the commentators’ submissions and comments … Discussion/ Conclusion: The statements describing the results of the analysis of the NAC studies … Discussion/ Conclusion: I found the presentation a little confusion. … Discussion/ Conclusion: The implication and uncertainty in the results are clearly stated. … Would like to see some discussion of this by the authors in the intro and conclusion section.
  14. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/products/systematic-review-updates/research
    November 01, 2017 - whether the new findings provided a signal according to the Ottawa Method and/or the RAND Method, on a conclusion-by-conclusion
  15. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/ace-inhibitor-arb-update-surveillance-160328.pdf
    March 28, 2016 - "" •" Original"conclusion"is"out"of"date … ’s"conclusion,"and/or" a"minority"of"responding"experts"assessed"the"systematic"review’s"conclusion"as"having … " new"evidence"that"might"change"the"conclusion,"then"we"classified"the"systematic" review"conclusion"as"possibly"out"of"date … ,"we"classified"the"systematic"review"conclusion"as"out"of"date." … $In$conclusion,$the$incidence$of$blood$pressure$increases$with$aliskiren$was$similar$to$that$during$
  16. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/stroke-atrial-fibrillation_disposition-comments.pdf
    August 23, 2013 - At the conclusion of the public comment period, authors use the commentators’ submissions and comments … I don’t think the data presented back up the conclusion of the report here. … Summary/ Discussion/ Conclusion Unfortunately, the conclusion in a number of the key areas was … TEP #1 Summary/ Discussion/ Conclusion Yes. … TEP #3 Summary/ Discussion/ Conclusion Key findings - disproportionate text on NOACs.
  17. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/measuring-blood-pressure-surveillance-160412.pdf
    April 11, 2016 - "" •" Original"conclusion"is"out"of"date … ,"we"classified"the"systematic" review"conclusion"as"likely"current."" •" If"we"found"some"new"evidence"that"might"change"the"systematic"review"conclusion … ," and/or"a"minority"of"responding"experts"assessed"the"systematic"review"conclusion"as" having"new"evidence"that"might"change"the"conclusion … ,"then"we"classified"the" systematic"review"conclusion"as"possibly"not"current."" •" If"we"found"new"evidence"that"rendered"the"systematic"review"conclusion"out"of"date"or … " no"longer"applicable,"we"classified"the"systematic"review"conclusion"as"out"of"date."
  18. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/vitamin-d-calcium_disposition-comments.pdf
    September 15, 2014 - At the conclusion of the public comment period, authors use the commentators’ submissions and comments … We added the unadjusted figures and noted the adjustment 70 TEP 1 Discussion/Conclusion The discussion … . 73 Peer Reviewer 1 Discussion/Conclusion (Page 327) Section dealing with methods/assays etc. … We have now noted this in our description of the findings. 75 Peer Reviewer 1 Discussion/Conclusion … No response needed 77 Peer Reviewer 3 Discussion/Conclusion For the conclusion they should include
  19. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/prostate-cancer-surveillance_disposition-comments.pdf
    December 01, 2011 - At the conclusion of the public comment period, authors use the commentators’ submissions and comments … Peer Reviewer 5 Discussion/Conclusion p.101 discussion of observation vs. RP (and RT later). … Peer Reviewer 5 Discussion/Conclusion p. 103 line 22. … Peer Reviewer 5 Discussion/Conclusion p.103 line 32 plus. … Peer Reviewer 5 Discussion/Conclusion p. 124 KQ4.
  20. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/tinnitus_disposition-comments.pdf
    August 23, 2013 - At the conclusion of the public comment period, authors use the commentators’ submissions and comments … Discussion/ Conclusion The findings are clearly stated. … Discussion/ Conclusion The discussion and conclusion are appropriate. Thank You. … Discussion/ Conclusion I agree with the suggestions for future research. … Discussion/ Conclusion Yes to all questions. Thank You.

Search the AHRQ Archive

Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.

Search Archive

Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site

You selected to view results for the following site: