Results

Total Results: 744 records

Showing results for "calculated".

  1. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/decide16final-mortality-risk-in-copd-pts-using-theophylline.pdf
    December 01, 2009 - Average daily dose was calculated by dividing the cumulative amount of medication by the number of days … For THEO, the dose of medications was calculated in units of theophylline. … Propensity scores were calculated to balance groups on baseline characteristics in an effort to reduce … A propensity score for each individual was calculated and five equal size groups were created based … estimate for the effect of theophylline more than 10%.35 An overall estimate across quintiles was calculated
  2. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/copd-management_research.pdf
    December 01, 2009 - Average daily dose was calculated by dividing the cumulative amount of medication by the number of days … For THEO, the dose of medications was calculated in units of theophylline. … Propensity scores were calculated to balance groups on baseline characteristics in an effort to reduce … A propensity score for each individual was calculated and five equal size groups were created based … estimate for the effect of theophylline more than 10%.35 An overall estimate across quintiles was calculated
  3. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/quantitative-synthesis-expanded-methods_methods.pdf
    March 01, 2013 - Smeeth et al.30 provided a good example, and calculated NNT with statins to prevent one cardiovascular … **No upper number needed to treat can be calculated as the upper 95% CI of pooled absolute risk difference
  4. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/stakeholders-engagement-others_research-2011.pdf
    January 01, 2011 - Engaging Stakeholders to Identify and Prioritize Topics for Future Research: Recommended activities and reporting practices 1 Engaging Stakeholders to Identify and Prioritize Topics for Future Research: Recommended activities and reporting practices This table presents a series of recommended activities for resea…
  5. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/methods-results-search-strategies-developed-with-without-text-mining-tools.pdf
    March 01, 2021 - Sensitivity and NNR were calculated against the reference standard for each review for each approach … To operationalize KQ2a, we calculated sensitivity as identified included / (identified included + not … For KQ2b, we calculated precision as identified included / total citations retrieved; and NNR as 1 / … NNR was calculated by combining averages, rather than by the average NNR across individual projects. … With these tools I used the analyses that calculated occurrence.
  6. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/app-d-opioid-chronic-pain-surveill-report-1.xlsx
    September 30, 2015 - : 5% (1/20) vs. 0% Total: 45 vs. 17, p<0.001 Pharmaceutical Fair * RR and mean differences calculated … C: aOR 0.28 (95% CI 0.13 to 0.62) Note: ADL and IADL not calculated due to small sample size Patients
  7. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/cystic-fibrosis-hgh_research-protocol.pdf
    August 22, 2008 - When pooling continuous endpoints, a weighted mean difference (WMD) will be calculated using a DerSimonian … Standard deviations (SDs) of the change scores will be calculated from the SD of the baseline values … When pooling continuous endpoints, a weighted mean difference (WMD) will be calculated using a DerSimonian
  8. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/field-triage-glascow-disposition-170415.pdf
    January 12, 2017 - The AUROC by definition is based on sensitivity and specificity calculated at different values of the … Peer Reviewer #5 General Comments In practice, GCS is rarely fully calculated before the decision … Commentator & Affiliation Section Comment Response Peer Reviewer #2 Methods Were Kappa scores calculated … providers regarding traumatized patients know how often the reported GCS is a guess rather than a calculated
  9. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/methods-guidance-quantitative-synthesis_methods.pdf
    October 01, 2010 - Comparison The naïve indirect comparison—where the summary event rate for each intervention is calculated … measures, though they are usually not considered for meta-analyses as the standard error is rarely calculated … When using a relative measure, risk differences and NNT/NNH should be calculated using the combined
  10. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/methodsguide_conductingquantitativesynthesis.pdf
    October 01, 2010 - Comparison The naïve indirect comparison—where the summary event rate for each intervention is calculated … measures, though they are usually not considered for meta-analyses as the standard error is rarely calculated … When using a relative measure, risk differences and NNT/NNH should be calculated using the combined
  11. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/arthritis-knee-physical-therapy_research-protocol.pdf
    April 01, 2010 - Publication of substantial new research evidence may alter the calculated risk-benefit ratio for some … Standardized mean differences will be calculated for different measures of the same outcome. … models only.45 The number needed to treat to achieve one event of patient-centered outcome will be calculated
  12. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/study-design-framework_research.pdf
    March 01, 2012 - Methods Future Research Needs Number 8: Framework for Considering Study Designs Methods Future Research Needs Report Number 8 Framework for Considering Study Designs for Future Research Needs Methods Future Research Needs Report Num…
  13. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/migraine-prevention_research-protocol.pdf
    November 03, 2011 - Standardized mean differences will be calculated for different continuous measures of the same outcome … 3, 2011 The number needed to treat to achieve one event of a patient-centered outcome will be calculated
  14. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/mcda-johnson.pdf
    August 27, 2012 - The Use of Conjoint Analysis to Elicit Patient Preferences in Selecting Treatment Endpoints Slide 1 The Use of Conjoint Analysis to Elicit Patient Preferences in Selecting Treatment Endpoints F. Reed Johnson, PhD Distinguished Fellow and Principal Economist Research Triangle Institute Integrating Stakehold…
  15. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/TND_0309_05-03-2008.pdf
    January 01, 2008 - Effective Health Care Topic Number(s): 0082 Document Completion Date: 5-19-09 1 Results of Topic Selection Process & Next Steps  Management of patients with mild renal impairment will move forward to be refined as an effectiveness review via the AHRQ Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) Progr…
  16. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cell-free-dna-appendix-c-prepub-final.xlsx
    January 01, 2025 - Mean (SD) 59 (10.7)[Calculated] NR 14 NR 86 138 33 36 9 262 128 134 62 62 62 NR NR None NR None NR None … Sensitivity Calculated Sensitivity_Lower_CI Calculated Sensitivity_Upper_CI Calculated Specificity Calculated … Specificity_Lower_CI Calculated Specificity_Upper_CI Calculated PPV Calculated PPV_Lower_CI Calculated … PPV_Upper_CI Calculated NPV Calculated NPV_Lower_CI Calculated NPV_Upper_CI Other Relevant Accuracy … TOO prediction accuracy was calculated as 13/17 (76.5% when considering either first or second TOO prediction
  17. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cell-free-dna-final-app-c.xlsx
    January 01, 2025 - Mean (SD) 59 (10.7)[Calculated] NR 14 NR 86 138 33 36 9 262 128 134 62 62 62 NR NR None NR None NR None … Sensitivity Calculated Sensitivity_Lower_CI Calculated Sensitivity_Upper_CI Calculated Specificity Calculated … Specificity_Lower_CI Calculated Specificity_Upper_CI Calculated PPV Calculated PPV_Lower_CI Calculated … PPV_Upper_CI Calculated NPV Calculated NPV_Lower_CI Calculated NPV_Upper_CI Other Relevant Accuracy … TOO prediction accuracy was calculated as 13/17 (76.5% when considering either first or second TOO prediction
  18. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/ehc-presentation-quantitative-synthesis-chapter-4.pdf
    July 01, 2019 - . • I2 is calculated based on Q or 𝜏𝜏2, so any issues affecting these statistics will also affect I2 … . • I2 should be calculated even when Q is not statistically significant.
  19. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/kidney-stone-prevention_research-protocol.pdf
    June 15, 2011 - 1 Source: www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov Published Online: June 15, 2011 Evidence-based Practice Center Systematic Review Protocol Recurrent Nephrolithiasis in Adults: A Comparative Effectiveness Review of Preventive Medical Strategies I. Background and Objectives for the Systematic Review …
  20. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/weight-loss-surgery_research-protocol.pdf
    December 14, 2010 - If a study does not report a follow-up mean or if a follow-up mean can not be calculated from the given … Effect sizes will be calculated for each comparison. … the same scale, then the effect size does not need to be standardized and a mean difference will be calculated

Search the AHRQ Archive

Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.

Search Archive

Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site

You selected to view results for the following site: