Results

Total Results: 139 records

Showing results for "better".
Users also searched for: beers

21. MEPS HC-220I
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_stats/download_data/pufs/h220i/h220idoc.shtml
    August 01, 2022 - As a result, it can be expected to better cover the full U.S. civilian, noninstitutionalized population … Better coverage of the target population helps to reduce the potential for bias in both NHIS and MEPS

22. Any Use and "Frequent Use" of Opioids among Adults Aged 18-64 in 2020-2021, by Socioeconomic Characteristics
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st552/stat552.shtml
    September 01, 2023 - All differences mentioned in the text are significant at the p<0.05 level or better. … opioid prescription fills (7.7 percent and 18.1 percent, respectively) compared with those who reported better

23. Any Use and "Frequent Use" of Opioids among Adults Aged 18-64 in 2020-2021, by Socioeconomic Characteristics (pdf file)
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st552/stat552.pdf
    September 20, 2023 - All differences mentioned in the text are significant at the p<0.05 level or better. 1 Centers for … prescription fills (7.7 percent and 18.1 percent, respectively) compared with those who reported better

24. STATISTICAL BRIEF #280: Expenditures for the Top Five Therapeutic Classes of Outpatient Prescription Drugs, Medicare Beneficiaries, Age 65 and Older, 2007
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st280/stat280.shtml
    February 01, 2010 - All differences discussed in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level or better.

25. Statistical Brief #313: Expenditures for the Top Five Therapeutic Classes of Outpatient Prescription Drugs, Adults Age 18 and Older, U.S. Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population, 2008 (pdf file)
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st313/stat313.pdf
    February 01, 2011 - All differences discussed in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level or better.

26. Summary of Recommendations from Round 2 Cognitive Testing of the MEPS Cancer SAQ
    meps.ahrq.gov/survey_comp/hc_survey/2011/MEPS_Cancer_SAQ_R2_Results.shtml
    January 01, 2011 - During this round of testing, respondents appeared to have a better understanding of what the survey … Another respondent felt her situation would be better captured by asking how much of her savings was … One respondent answered "no" for all sub-items, saying "it didn’t make me a better person, it made … A third respondent crossed out the word "better" at Q94b and wrote in "differently" saying, "I cope … differently, but I don’t know if it’s better."

27. STATISTICAL BRIEF #537: Trends in the Number and Percentage of the Population with Any Dental or Medical Visits, 2003-2018
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st537/stat537.shtml
    October 01, 2021 - Americans." [1] Since the publication of that report, there has been a concerted effort to better … between estimates discussed in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level or better

28. AHRQ Statistical Brief #267: Group and Non-Group Private Health Insurance Coverage, 1996 to 2007: Estimates for the U.S. Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population under Age 65 (pdf file)
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st267/stat267.pdf
    October 01, 2009 - differences between estimates discussed in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level or better

29. Statistical Brief #111: Expenses for a Hospital Emergency Room Visit, 2003 (pdf file)
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st111/stat111.pdf
    January 01, 2006 - differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level or better

30. STATISTICAL BRIEF #289: Back Problems: Use and Expenditures for the U.S. Adult Population, 2007
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st289/stat289.shtml
    July 01, 2010 - differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level or better

31. Statistical Brief #289: Back Problems: Use and Expenditures for the U.S. Adult Population, 2007 (pdf file)
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st289/stat289.pdf
    July 01, 2010 - differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level or better

32. Statistical Brief #554: Characteristics of Young Adults Aged 18-24 Who Had Ever Used an Electronic Nicotine Product, 2021
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st554/stat554.shtml
    February 01, 2024 - All differences mentioned in the text are significant at the p<0.05 level or better.

33. Statistical Brief #166: Expenses for Office-Based Physician Visits by Specialty, 2004 (pdf file)
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st166/stat166.pdf
    March 01, 2007 - differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level or better

34. Statistical Brief #173: Use of the Pap Test as a Cancer Screening Tool among Women Age 18–64, U.S. Noninstitutionalized Population, 2005 (pdf file)
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st173/stat173.pdf
    June 01, 2007 - All differences discussed in the text are statistically significant at 0.05 or better.

35. Statistical Brief #115: Health Service Use and Expenses for Migraines and Other Headaches, 2002–03 (Average Annual Estimates) (pdf file)
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st115/stat115.pdf
    February 01, 2006 - differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level or better

36. Statistical Brief #147: Children Living with Adult Smokers, United States, 2004 (pdf file)
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st147/stat147.pdf
    November 01, 2006 - differences between estimates discussed in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level or better

37. Methodology Report #6: List Sample Design of the 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Insurance Component (pdf file)
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/mr6/mr6.pdf
    July 01, 1999 - These improvements, which are discussed in later sections, include use of a more accurate frame, a better … allocation of units between government and the private sector, and a better allocation to strata within … However, this allocation to governments appears to be still too large, and it would be better to further

38. AHRQ Statistical Brief 524 (pdf file)
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st524/stat524.pdf
    July 01, 2019 - All differences discussed in the text are at the 0.05 significance level, or better.

39. Research Findings #43: Average Annual Opioid Use among Adults Treated for Conditions Associated with Chronic Pain versus Other Conditions, 2013-2015 (pdf file)
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/rf43/rf43.pdf
    August 01, 2019 - non-chronic conditions group were much less likely to be elderly and more likely to be employed and in better … Health status: Adults in fair or poor health were more likely to have any opioid use than adults in better … addition, opioid users in fair/poor health had over two more fills per year on average than those in better

40. RESEARCH FINDINGS #43: Average Annual Opioid Use among Adults Treated for Conditions Associated with Chronic Pain versus Other Conditions, 2013-2015
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/rf43/rf43.shtml
    August 01, 2019 - non-chronic conditions group were much less likely to be elderly and more likely to be employed and in better … Health status: Adults in fair or poor health were more likely to have any opioid use than adults in better … addition, opioid users in fair/poor health had over two more fills per year on average than those in better