Results

Total Results: 455 records

Showing results for "better".
Users also searched for: beers

  1. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/methods/2018-03.pdf
    January 01, 2018 - Other Considerations There are two other considerations for better aligning HCUP to CPS and for using … might use both the primary and secondary payer categories (available for some states) in HCUP to get a better
  2. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/methods/2015-07.pdf
    January 01, 2015 - Other Considerations There are two other considerations for better aligning HCUP to CPS and for using … might use both the primary and secondary payer categories (available for some states) in HCUP to get a better
  3. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/methods/2014-02.pdf
    January 01, 2014 - Other Considerations There are two other considerations for better aligning HCUP to CPS and for using … might use both the primary and secondary payer categories (available for some states) in HCUP to get a better
  4. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/methods/2017-04.pdf
    January 01, 2017 - Other Considerations There are two other considerations for better aligning HCUP to CPS and for using … might use both the primary and secondary payer categories (available for some states) in HCUP to get a better
  5. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/methods/2013_01.pdf
    January 01, 2013 - Other Considerations There are two other considerations for better aligning HCUP to CPS and for using … might use both the primary and secondary payer categories (available for some states) in HCUP to get a better
  6. MS-2019-02 (pdf file)

    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/methods/2019-02.pdf
    January 01, 2019 - Other Considerations There are two other considerations for better aligning HCUP to CPS and for using … might use both the primary and secondary payer categories (available for some states) in HCUP to get a better
  7. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/methods/2016-04.pdf
    January 01, 2016 - Other Considerations There are two other considerations for better aligning HCUP to CPS and for using … might use both the primary and secondary payer categories (available for some states) in HCUP to get a better
  8. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb89.pdf
    April 01, 2010 - differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level or better
  9. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb100.pdf
    November 01, 2010 - differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level or better
  10. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb48.pdf
    March 01, 2008 - differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level or better
  11. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb34.pdf
    July 01, 2007 - differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level or better
  12. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb132.pdf
    March 01, 2012 - differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level or better
  13. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb102.pdf
    December 09, 2010 - differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level or better
  14. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb163.jsp
    October 01, 2013 - All differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the .001 or better
  15. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb165.pdf
    March 01, 2013 - differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the .001 level or better
  16. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb160.pdf
    July 01, 2013 - differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the .05 level or better
  17. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb171-Operating-Room-Procedure-Trends.pdf
    September 01, 2013 - All differences between estimates noted in the text are significantly different at the .001 level or better
  18. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb155.jsp
    May 01, 2013 - differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level or better
  19. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb149.jsp
    February 01, 2013 - differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the .001 level or better
  20. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb143.jsp
    November 01, 2012 - subgroup estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 probability level or better

Search the AHRQ Archive

Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.

Search Archive

Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site

You selected to view results for the following site: