-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/methods/2018-03.pdf
January 01, 2018 - Other Considerations
There are two other considerations for better aligning HCUP to CPS and for using … might use both the
primary and secondary payer categories (available for some states) in HCUP to get a better
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/methods/2015-07.pdf
January 01, 2015 - Other Considerations
There are two other considerations for better aligning HCUP to CPS and for using … might use both the
primary and secondary payer categories (available for some states) in HCUP to get a better
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/methods/2014-02.pdf
January 01, 2014 - Other Considerations
There are two other considerations for better aligning HCUP to CPS and for using … might use both the
primary and secondary payer categories (available for some states) in HCUP to get a better
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/methods/2017-04.pdf
January 01, 2017 - Other Considerations
There are two other considerations for better aligning HCUP to CPS and for using … might use both the
primary and secondary payer categories (available for some states) in HCUP to get a better
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/methods/2013_01.pdf
January 01, 2013 - Other Considerations
There are two other considerations for better aligning HCUP to CPS and for using … might use both the
primary and secondary payer categories (available for some states) in HCUP to get a better
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/methods/2019-02.pdf
January 01, 2019 - Other Considerations
There are two other considerations for better aligning HCUP to CPS and for using … might use both the
primary and secondary payer categories (available for some states) in HCUP to get a better
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/methods/2016-04.pdf
January 01, 2016 - Other Considerations
There are two other considerations for better aligning HCUP to CPS and for using … might use both the
primary and secondary payer categories (available for some states) in HCUP to get a better
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb89.pdf
April 01, 2010 - differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically
significant at the 0.05 level or better
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb100.pdf
November 01, 2010 - differences between estimates noted in
the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level or better
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb48.pdf
March 01, 2008 - differences between
estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05
level or better
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb34.pdf
July 01, 2007 - differences
between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the
0.05 level or better
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb132.pdf
March 01, 2012 - differences between estimates noted in the text are
statistically significant at the 0.05 level or better
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb102.pdf
December 09, 2010 - differences
between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant
at the 0.05 level or better
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb163.jsp
October 01, 2013 - All differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the .001 or better
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb165.pdf
March 01, 2013 - differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically
significant at the .001 level or better
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb160.pdf
July 01, 2013 - differences between
estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the .05 level
or better
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb171-Operating-Room-Procedure-Trends.pdf
September 01, 2013 - All differences between estimates noted in the text are significantly different at the .001 level or better
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb155.jsp
May 01, 2013 - differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level or better
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb149.jsp
February 01, 2013 - differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the .001 level or better
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb143.jsp
November 01, 2012 - subgroup estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 probability level or better