Results

Total Results: 2,081 records

Showing results for "authors".

1. Impact of Contacting Study Authors on Systematic Review Conclusions: Diagnostic Tests for Hepatic Fibrosis | Effective Health Care (EHC) Program
   effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/hepatic-fibrosis/white-paper
   April 02, 2014 - Impact of Contacting Study Authors on Systematic Review Conclusions: Diagnostic Tests for Hepatic Fibrosis … To determine the efficacy and impact of contacting authors to clarify discordant data or obtain missing … All authors who provided data did so by the third written request for information. … Authors of more recent studies were significantly more likely to be located and provide data compared … to authors of older studies.

2. Impact of Contacting Study Authors on Systematic Review Conclusions: Diagnostic Tests for Hepatic Fibrosis | Effective Health Care Program
   effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/hepatic-fibrosis
   April 02, 2014 - Impact of Contacting Study Authors on Systematic Review Conclusions: Diagnostic Tests for Hepatic Fibrosis … Initiated April 02, 2014 White Paper Impact of Contacting Study Authors

3. Disposition of Comments: Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 234_Management of Primary Headaches in Pregnancy (pdf file)
   effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/cer-234-headaches-pregnancy-comments.pdf
   November 12, 2020 - Comments on draft reviews and the authors’ responses to the comments are posted for public viewing on … Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) authors made these changes. … EPC authors included both studies. … EPC authors added those details to the Discussion. … EPC authors made these changes.

4. Disposition of Comments: CER 234 Management of Primary Headaches in Pregnancy (pdf file)
   effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/cer-234-headaches-pregnancy-revised-comments.pdf
   November 12, 2020 - Comments on draft reviews and the authors’ responses to the comments are posted for public viewing on … EPC authors made these changes. … EPC authors included both studies. … EPC authors added those details to the Discussion. … EPC authors made these changes.

5. Disposition of Comments: CER 234 Management of Primary Headaches in Pregnancy (pdf file)
   effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cer-234-headaches-pregnancy-revised-comments.pdf
   November 12, 2020 - Comments on draft reviews and the authors’ responses to the comments are posted for public viewing on … EPC authors made these changes. … EPC authors included both studies. … EPC authors added those details to the Discussion. … EPC authors made these changes.

6. Cer-254-Rural-Telehealth-App-E (xls file)
   effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cer-254-rural-telehealth-app-e.xlsx
   January 01, 2021 - Unclear Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes: Conflicts acknowledged or someone from funder is one of the authors … Unclear Yes No Yes Unclear No Yes Yes Yes: Conflicts acknowledged or someone from funder is one of the authors … Unclear Yes Unclear Unclear NA Yes Yes: Conflicts acknowledged or someone from funder is one of the authors … NA Yes Yes: Conflicts acknowledged or someone from funder is one of the authors High Mohr 2020 Prospective … Unclear Yes Yes No Yes Unclear Yes Yes: Conflicts acknowledged or someone from funder is one of the authors

7. Methods Guide for Medical Test Reviews - Editorial (pdf file)
   effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/methods-guide-editorial_methods.pdf
   July 01, 2012 - Methods Guide for Medical Test Reviews - Editorial E-1 Editorial Methods Guide for Authors of … Guidelines have evolved to assist authors of systematic reviews in medicine. … Guidelines also exist to assist authors in the conduct of reviews. … resource for other authors of systematic reviews. … guidance to all authors of systematic reviews of medical tests.

8. Disposition of Comments: CER 230 Therapies for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer (pdf file)
   effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/cer-230-prostate-cancer-comments.pdf
   September 17, 2020 - At the conclusion of the public comment period, authors use the commentators’ comments to revise the … Comments on draft reports and the authors’ responses to the comments are posted for public viewing on … This document includes the responses by the authors of the report to comments that were submitted for … The authors have revised the report to consistently include this information when available. … The authors have since introduced two separate terms (AM vs. AS) to emphasize this issue better.

9. Supplemental Project To Assess the Transparency of Reporting for Strategies To Improve Mental Health Care for Children and Adolescents | Effective Health Care (EHC) Program
   effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/transparency-mental-health/research
   January 06, 2017 - KQ 3 For discontinued studies, we planned to reach out to authors via email to identify reasons for … Questions for authors of studies identified for the SIMHC report or through clinicaltrials.gov Authors … In clinicaltrials.gov, the authors provide raw data rather than adjusted results. … Authors who attempt to register studies on their own reported difficulties. … Second, authors did not generally report findings on clinicaltrials.gov.

10. Disposition of Comments_Technical Brief No. 43: Measuring Healthcare Organization Characteristics in Cancer Care Delivery Research (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/organization-cancer-care-disposition-comments.pdf
    June 20, 2023 - At the conclusion of the public comment period, authors use the commentators’ comments to revise … Comments on draft reports and the authors’ responses to the comments are posted for public viewing … This document includes the responses by the authors of the report to comments that were submitted for … The responses to comments in this disposition report are those of the authors, who are responsible … Further, the authors further provide context for consideration of the Integrated Framework.

11. Guidelines-Peer-Public-Review (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/Guidelines-Peer-Public-Review.pdf
    November 08, 2013 - should: • Be objective and constructive in their reviews and provide feedback that will help the authors … work has been done before’, to help editors in their evaluation and decision and in fairness to the authors … • Remember it is the authors’ paper and not attempt to rewrite it to their own preferred style if … • Not suggest that authors include citations to the reviewer’s (or their associates’) work merely … Ensure their comments and recommendations for the editor are consistent with their report for the authors

12. Editorial. Methods Guide for Authors of Systematic Reviews of Medical Tests: A Collaboration Between the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and the Journal of General Internal Medicine | Effective Health Care Program
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/methods-guide-editorial
    June 01, 2012 - Methods Guide for Authors of Systematic Reviews of Medical Tests: A Collaboration Between the Agency … Methods Guide for Authors of Systematic Reviews of Medical Tests: A Collaboration Between the Agency

13. Disposition of Comments Report for Treatment of Depression During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/depression-pregnancy-postpartum_disposition-comments.pdf
    July 08, 2014 - The report authors acknowledge and appreciate the comment. … The report authors acknowledge and appreciate the comment. … The report authors acknowledge and appreciate the comment. … The report authors acknowledge and appreciate the comment. … The report authors acknowledge and appreciate the comment.

14. Transparency of Reporting Requirements: Strategies to Improve Mental Health Care for Children and Adolescents | Effective Health Care (EHC) Program
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/transparency-mental-health/research-protocol
    September 03, 2016 - To achieve this goal, we will reach out to authors to understand the utility of clinicaltrials.gov and … For studies with differences in reporting by source, we will reach out to study authors via email and … For completed and unpublished studies, we will reach out to authors of discontinued studies via email … Questions for authors of studies identified for the SIMHC report or through clinicaltrials.gov Item … For authors of included clinical trials included in the report that do not have a clinicaltrials.gov

15. Supplemental Project To Assess the Transparency of Reporting for Strategies To Improve Mental Health Care for Children and Adolescents (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/transparency-mental-health_research.pdf
    January 01, 2017 - Questions for authors of studies identified for the SIMHC report or through clinicaltrials.gov …………… … To achieve this goal, we reached out to authors to understand the utility of clinicaltrials.gov and … In clinicaltrials.gov, the authors provide raw data rather than adjusted results. … Authors who attempt to register studies on their own reported difficulties. … Second, authors did not generally report findings on clinicaltrials.gov.

16. Hepatic-Fibrosis White-Paper (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/hepatic-fibrosis_white-paper.pdf
    April 01, 2014 - Research White Paper Impact of Contacting Study Authors on Systematic Review Conclusions: Diagnostic … to authors of older studies. … If still unable to reach corresponding authors, we attempted to contact last authors and statisticians … If corresponding authors forwarded our request to other authors, we sent reminders to these authors … Sample of Letter Sent to Authors

17. Disposition of Comments for Diagnostic Accuracy of Screening and Treatment of Post-Acute Coronary Syndrome Depression (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cer-200-comments-post-acs.pdf
    November 14, 2017 - Comments on draft reviews and the authors’ responses to the comments are posted for public viewing on … The authors didn't address these aspects in their manuscript. … If yes, how did the authors decide which exclusion was the "reason". … I would prefer the authors be more specific. … The authors should seek to resolve this potential mixed message.

18. Transparency of Reporting Requirements: Strategies to Improve Mental Health Care for Children and Adolescents (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/transparency-mental-health_research-protocol.pdf
    September 01, 2016 - To achieve this goal, we will reach out to authors to understand the utility of clinicaltrials.gov and … (b) For studies with differences in reporting by source, we will reach out to study authors via email … (c) For completed and unpublished studies, we will reach out to authors of discontinued studies via … [For authors of included clinical trials included in the report that are clinical trials who have a … [For authors of studies included in the report that are NOT clinical trials, N=44, 11, 16, 17] 1.

19. AHRQ Slide Template 2009 (ppt file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/reporting.ppt
    September 01, 2009 - When authors do not provide sufficient details concerning the conduct of their study, readers are left … …Disagreements were resolved by discussion between the two review authors. … from the authors of the primary studies. … The example in the slide gives the level of detail that authors should report. … In the example in this slide, authors provide the rationale in a narrative format.

20. Disposition of Comments for Progestogens for Prevention of Preterm Birth (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/progestogens-preterm-birth-disposition-121205.pdf
    September 07, 2012 - The authors may wish to modify the initial comment regarding “no maternal factors”. … However, the authors may not have had a way to know this. … The authors may also want to add “multiple gestation.” … The authors attempt to logically follow through the key questions. … The authors adequately summarize the data and arrive at clear recommendations.