Results

Total Results: 1,963 records

Showing results for "assessing".

  1. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/medical-test-reviews-strength-evidence.ppt
    June 01, 2012 - Describe the required domains involved in assessing strength of evidence. … Assessing the “strength” of the entire body of evidence includes assessing the quality of individual … Assessing applicability of medical test studies in systematic reviews. … Assessing applicability of medical test studies in systematic reviews. … Assessing applicability of medical test studies in systematic reviews.
  2. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/methods-guidance-principles_methods.pdf
    August 01, 2009 - Topics included assessing beneficial8 or harmful effects of interventions,9 using observational studies … ,10 assessing diagnostic tests11 or therapeutic devices,12 and others. … • A weakly developed approach to assessing the strength of evidence and a desire to begin to reconcile … • Assessing the applicability of studies. • Assessing harms. • Assessing the quality of studies. … The promise of risk-based allocation trials in assessing new treatments [editorial].
  3. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/mhs-IV-rapid-response-deprescribing.pdf
    February 01, 2024 - We identified toolkits without assessing or endorsing them. 2.1 Eligibility Criteria for Studies of … the risk of bias of RCTs or the ROBINS-I tool for assessing the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS- I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non- randomised studies of interventions. … Criteria for Assessing Internal Validity of Individual Studies. Rockville, MD: U.S.
  4. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/medical-test-reviews-intro.ppt
    June 01, 2012 - Assessing the impact of medical tests can be challenging. … Challenges Specific to Medical Tests (1 of 2) Assessing the impact of medical tests can be challenging … Therefore, assessing the impact of medical tests is not as straightforward as assessing the impact of … It is important for assessing whether or not a given study is applicable. … Therefore, the PICOTS typology is important for defining the key questions of a review and for assessing
  5. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/medical-test-reviews-intro.ppt
    June 01, 2012 - Assessing the impact of medical tests can be challenging. … Challenges Specific to Medical Tests (1 of 2) Assessing the impact of medical tests can be challenging … Therefore, assessing the impact of medical tests is not as straightforward as assessing the impact of … It is important for assessing whether or not a given study is applicable. … Therefore, the PICOTS typology is important for defining the key questions of a review and for assessing
  6. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/c-difficile-update_research-protocol.pdf
    December 23, 2014 - Chapter 5: assessing risk of bias as a domain of quality in medical test studies. … Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. … Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. … Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions … Grading the strength of a body of evidence when assessing health care interventions for the effective
  7. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/chronic-urinary-retention_research-protocol.pdf
    November 19, 2012 - Other factors that may be considered in assessing strength of evidence include dose-response relationship … Assessing Applicability. … Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. … Grading the strength of a body of evidence when assessing health care interventions--AHRQ and the effective … Assessing the Applicability of Studies When Comparing Medical Interventions. 2010.
  8. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/ocd-protocol.pdf
    August 15, 2023 - The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. … Development and validation of methods for assessing the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies. … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non- randomised studies of interventions.
  9. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/integrating-evidence_methods.pdf
    February 01, 2015 - risk of bias of primary studies in existing reviews, and summarizing and assessing the strength of … The interview questions covered three general topics: • Using multiple existing reviews • Assessing … risk of bias • Summarizing and assessing bodies of evidence. … Assessing Risk of Bias KIs noted that assessments of the risk of bias (RoB) of individual studies are … Several tools exist for assessing the methodological strengths and limitations of systematic reviews
  10. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/chronic-cough_executive.pdf
    March 01, 2014 - Data necessary for assessing quality and applicability were also abstracted. … validity and responsiveness of the Parent Cough- specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (PC-QOL) in assessing … and other cough-specific instruments may therefore be more useful than simple cough frequency in assessing … Conclusions There is no established gold standard for assessing either frequency or severity/QOL of … Assessing applicability when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program
  11. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/machine-learning-tools-appendix-d.xlsx
    January 01, 2024 - RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials 2016 RobotReviewer … ChatGPT for assessing risk of bias of randomized trials using the RoB 2.0 tool: A methods study 2023 … ChatGPT for assessing risk of bias of randomized trials using the RoB 2.0 tool: A methods study 2023 … ChatGPT for assessing risk of bias of randomized trials using the RoB 2.0 tool: A methods study 2023 … RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials 2016 RobotReviewer
  12. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/cancer-quality-indicator-framework/research
  13. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/cancer-end-of-life-measures-framework/research
  14. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/methods-future-research-impact/research
  15. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/chronic-kidney-disease-anemia-2011/research
  16. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/suicidal-thoughts-young-people-amendement-may-2025.pdf
    January 01, 2025 - per the Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) Methods Guide for Comparative Effectiveness Reviews on assessingAssessing Applicability We will follow the procedures outlined in the EPC Methods Guide for Comparative … RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses … Studies Data Synthesis Grading the Strength of Evidence (SOE) for Major Comparisons and Outcomes Assessing
  17. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/pdf/epc-year-in-review-2019.pdf
    January 01, 2019 - technical-brief https://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/ta/index.html Methods Reports 2019 Reports Assessing … Systematic Review Antipsychotics for Treating Delirium in Hospitalized Adults: A Systematic Review Assessing
  18. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/suicidal-thoughts-young-people-draft-protocol.pdf
    March 14, 2024 - per the Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) Methods Guide for Comparative Effectiveness Reviews on assessingAssessing Applicability We will follow the procedures outlined in the EPC Methods Guide for Comparative … RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses … Studies Data Synthesis Grading the Strength of Evidence (SOE) for Major Comparisons and Outcomes Assessing
  19. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/effect-dietary-digestible.pdf
    January 01, 2021 - e.g., age, sex, race/ethnicity, country), intervention, comparisons, outcomes, and related items for assessing … and Outcomes We will grade the strength of the body of evidence (SOE) per the EPC methods guide on assessingAssessing Applicability Applicability is limited to the general population. 7 IV. … RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … Assessing Applicability IV. References V. Definition of Terms VI.
  20. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/risk-cardiovascular-disease.pdf
    January 01, 2023 - sex, race/ethnicity, country), intervention, comparisons, 5 outcomes, and related items for assessing … and Outcomes We will grade the strength of the body of evidence (SOE) per the EPC methods guide on assessingAssessing Applicability Applicability is limited to the general population. IV. … RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … Assessing Applicability IV. References V. Definition of Terms VI.

Search the AHRQ Archive

Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.

Search Archive

Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site

You selected to view results for the following site: