Results

Total Results: 2,658 records

Showing results for "assessing".

61. A Primer for Systematic Reviewers on the Measurement of Functional Status and Health-Related Quality of Life in Older Adults | Effective Health Care (EHC) Program
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/quality-of-life-functional-status-measurement/white-paper
    September 23, 2013 - Structured Abstract Background Provide a primer for systematic reviewers, clinicians, and researchers on assessing … The paper provides an overview of the methods for assessing function and HRQL, and evidence on the measurement … Methods The paper provides an overview of the methods for assessing function and HRQL, and evidence

62. EHC Protocol: Addressing Social Isolation To Improve Health of Older Adults: A Rapid Evidence Review (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/mhs4-infection-prevention-mdro-protocol.pdf
    July 01, 2023 - the risk of bias of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or the ROBINS-I tool for assessing the Risk … Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies – of Interventions.9, 10 When assessing RCTs, we will use the 7 … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non- randomised studies of interventions. … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … Criteria for Assessing Internal Validity of Individual Studies U.S.

63. Making Healthcare Safer IV: Use of Structured Handoff Protocols for Intrahospital Transitions (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/structured-handoff-protocol.pdf
    June 04, 2024 - We will identify toolkits without assessing or endorsing them. … Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies – of Interventions.21, 22 When assessing RCTs, we will use the 7 … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non- randomised studies of interventions. … Criteria for Assessing Internal Validity of Individual Studies. U.S.

64. Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/methods-guidance-bias-individual-studies_methods.pdf
    March 01, 2012 - Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions … Thus, assessing the risk of bias of a study can be thought of as assessing the risk that the study results … Included in assessing applicability of studies and the body of evidence? … Included in assessing applicability of studies and the body of evidence? … The (lack of) quality in assessing the quality of transplantation trials.

65. EHC Protocol: Making Healthcare Safer IV: Engaging Family Caregivers with Structured Communication for Safe Care Transitions (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/engaging-caregivers-protocol.pdf
    August 04, 2023 - We will identify toolkits without assessing or endorsing them. … Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies – of Interventions.22,23 When assessing RCTs, we will use the 7 … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. … Criteria for assessing internal validity of individual studies [internet]. Rockville (MD): U.S.

66. Evidence Summary - Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 249: Malnutrition in Hospitalized Adults: A Systematic Review (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cer-249-malnutrition-hospitalized-adults-evidence-summary.pdf
    October 01, 2021 - 2) evaluating the effectiveness of measurement tools of malnutrition on clinical outcomes, and (3) assessing … Using predefined criteria, we selected (1) existing systematic reviews (SRs) assessing the association … screening or diagnostic assessment on clinical outcomes, and (3) randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing … Furthermore, although SRs assessing the association between malnutrition and clinical outcomes included … First, is the need for controlled studies assessing their effectiveness in hospitalized adults.

67. Evidence Summary - Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 249: Malnutrition in Hospitalized Adults: A Systematic Review (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cer-249-malnutrition-hospitalized-adults-evidence-summary_0.pdf
    October 01, 2021 - 2) evaluating the effectiveness of measurement tools of malnutrition on clinical outcomes, and (3) assessing … Using predefined criteria, we selected (1) existing systematic reviews (SRs) assessing the association … screening or diagnostic assessment on clinical outcomes, and (3) randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing … Furthermore, although SRs assessing the association between malnutrition and clinical outcomes included … First, is the need for controlled studies assessing their effectiveness in hospitalized adults.

68. EHC Protocol: Addressing Social Isolation To Improve Health of Older Adults: A Rapid Evidence Review (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/patient-monitoring-systems-protocol.pdf
    July 01, 2023 - We will identify toolkits without assessing or endorsing them. … Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies – of Interventions.19, 20 When assessing RCTs, we will use the 7 … Criteria for Assessing Internal Validity of Individual Studies. U.S. … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.

69. Making Healthcare Safer IV: Supply Chain Disruption Monitoring Programs (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/monitoring-programs-protocol.pdf
    January 01, 2024 - We will identify toolkits without assessing or endorsing them. … Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies – of Interventions.14, 15 When assessing RCTs, we will use the 7 … If we include more than one study of effectiveness assessing included outcomes for a specific type … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.

70. Health Literacy | Effective Health Care (EHC) Program
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/health-topics/health-literacy
    September 30, 2009 - Barriers to Patient Engagement (Session II) White Paper September 30, 2015 Assessing

71. EHC Protocol: Making Healthcare Safer IV: Failure to Rescue: Rapid Response Systems (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/mhs4-failure-rescue-protocol_0.pdf
    July 01, 2023 - the risk of bias of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or the ROBINS-I tool for assessing the Risk … Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies – of Interventions.25, 26 When assessing RCTs, we will use the … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. … Criteria for Assessing Internal Validity of Individual Studies. U.S.

72. EHC Protocol: Addressing Social Isolation To Improve Health of Older Adults: A Rapid Evidence Review (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/mhs4-failure-rescue-protocol-amendment.pdf
    September 19, 2023 - the risk of bias of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or the ROBINS-I tool for assessing the Risk … Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies – of Interventions.25, 26 When assessing RCTs, we will use the … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. … Criteria for Assessing Internal Validity of Individual Studies. U.S.

73. Assessing Risk of Bias and Confounding in Observational Studies of Interventions or Exposures: Further Development of the RTI Item Bank | Effective Health Care (EHC) Program
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/rti-item-bank/research
    August 05, 2013 - Assessing Risk of Bias and Confounding in Observational Studies of Interventions or Exposures: Further … Working Group members also provided their opinion of the most important questions for assessing risk

74. EHC Protocol: Addressing Social Isolation To Improve Health of Older Adults: A Rapid Evidence Review (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/high-risk-drugs-protocol.pdf
    July 27, 2023 - We will identify toolkits without assessing or endorsing them. … When assessing non-randomized studies, we will use specific items in the ROBINS-I tool that assess … The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. … Criteria for assessing internal validity of individual studies. U.S.

75. AHRQ Slide Template 2009 (ppt file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/selecting-evidence.ppt
    January 01, 2010 - harms than for assessing benefits. … Assessing harms can be difficult. … Assessing harms can be difficult. … Reviewers should routinely include head-to-head and placebo-controlled RCTs in assessing harms. … In assessing benefits, reviewers should consider two questions: 1.

76. AHRQ Slide Template 2009 (ppt file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/selecting-evidence.ppt
    January 01, 2010 - harms than for assessing benefits. … Assessing harms can be difficult. … Assessing harms can be difficult. … Reviewers should routinely include head-to-head and placebo-controlled RCTs in assessing harms. … In assessing benefits, reviewers should consider two questions: 1.

77. Methods Guide for Medical Test Reviews (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/methods-guidance-tests-bias_methods.pdf
    July 01, 2012 - Methods Guide for Medical Test Reviews 5-1 Chapter 5 Assessing Risk of Bias as a Domain of Quality … Matchar, M.D., Duke University; Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore Abstract Assessing … Risk: Low/High/Unclear *Questions related to assessing applicability were excluded here. … Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. … Assessing risk of bias as a domain of quality in medical test studies.

78. Identifying Signals for Updating Systematic Reviews: A Comparison of Two Methods | Effective Health Care (EHC) Program
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/signals/research
    June 15, 2011 - Structured Abstract Background Methods of assessing the need for systematic reviews to be updated … Objectives To compare two methods for assessing the need to update an evidence review, using three

79. Methods-Balancing-Harms-Benefits Research-2012 (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/methods-balancing-harms-benefits_research-2012.pdf
    January 01, 2012 - Quantitative approaches exist for assessing benefits and harms, but it is unclear whether they are … benefits and harms, (3) to determine the role of values and preferences in assessing benefits and … harms across each step of a systematic review and (4) to formulate principles for assessing benefits … The process of assessing benefits and harms relies on several steps: 2 Figure 1. … and Harm Influence of Values and Preferences in Assessing Benefits and Harms Principles for Assessing

80. Quantitative Synthesis II: Interactive Quiz (ppt file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/selecting-evidence-quiz.ppt
    September 02, 2013 - Cross-sectional studies Cohort and case-control studies What Types of Observational Studies Are Best for Assessing … What Types of Observational Studies Are Best for Assessing Harms In the absence of sufficient trial … A type of detection bias A type of attrition bias A type of selection bias Assessing Bias in Observational … Studies Assessing Bias in Observational Studies What is confounding by indication? … When assessing harms in comparative effectiveness reviews, investigators should routinely include cohort