Results

Total Results: 1,963 records

Showing results for "assessing".

  1. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/mhs4-failure-rescue-protocol-amendment.pdf
    September 19, 2023 - the risk of bias of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or the ROBINS-I tool for assessing the Risk … Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies – of Interventions.25, 26 When assessing RCTs, we will use the … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. … Criteria for Assessing Internal Validity of Individual Studies. U.S.
  2. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/high-risk-drugs-protocol.pdf
    July 27, 2023 - We will identify toolkits without assessing or endorsing them. … When assessing non-randomized studies, we will use specific items in the ROBINS-I tool that assess … The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. … Criteria for assessing internal validity of individual studies. U.S.
  3. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/selecting-evidence.ppt
    January 01, 2010 - harms than for assessing benefits. … Assessing harms can be difficult. … Assessing harms can be difficult. … Reviewers should routinely include head-to-head and placebo-controlled RCTs in assessing harms. … In assessing benefits, reviewers should consider two questions: 1.
  4. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/selecting-evidence.ppt
    January 01, 2010 - harms than for assessing benefits. … Assessing harms can be difficult. … Assessing harms can be difficult. … Reviewers should routinely include head-to-head and placebo-controlled RCTs in assessing harms. … In assessing benefits, reviewers should consider two questions: 1.
  5. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/methods-guidance-tests-bias_methods.pdf
    July 01, 2012 - Methods Guide for Medical Test Reviews 5-1 Chapter 5 Assessing Risk of Bias as a Domain of Quality … Matchar, M.D., Duke University; Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore Abstract Assessing … Risk: Low/High/Unclear *Questions related to assessing applicability were excluded here. … Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. … Assessing risk of bias as a domain of quality in medical test studies.
  6. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/methods-balancing-harms-benefits_research-2012.pdf
    January 01, 2012 - Quantitative approaches exist for assessing benefits and harms, but it is unclear whether they are … benefits and harms, (3) to determine the role of values and preferences in assessing benefits and … harms across each step of a systematic review and (4) to formulate principles for assessing benefits … The process of assessing benefits and harms relies on several steps: 2 Figure 1. … and Harm Influence of Values and Preferences in Assessing Benefits and Harms Principles for Assessing
  7. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/methods-bias-update/methods
  8. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/effect-protein-intake-executive-summary.pdf
    November 01, 2024 - A single study assessing dietary protein's association with bone disease risk in children and adolescents … absence of sarcopenia as a study endpoint, lack of randomized controlled trials, and the challenges in assessing … These limitations could pose challenges in accurately assessing health effects. … Such improvements will be essential for assessing dietary protein’s impact on these chronic conditions
  9. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/methods-guidance-tests-applicability/slides
  10. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/methods-guidance-tests-grading_methods.pdf
    July 01, 2012 - When assessing the strength of an evidence base, systematic reviewers should consider four principle … One common challenge is that standard tools for assessing the quality of a body of evidence associated … Assessing “best evidence”: issues in grading the quality of studies for systematic reviews. … Assessing risk of bias as a domain of quality in medical test studies. … Assessing applicability of medical test studies in systematic reviews.
  11. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/masks-prevention-covid-healthcare-community-amended-protocol.pdf
    July 02, 2020 - Criteria for Assessing Internal Validity of Individual Studies. 2017. https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org … /uspstf/appendix-vi-criteria-assessing- internal-validity-individual-studies. … decontamination-reuse-respirators.html https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/appendix-vi-criteria-assessing-internal-validity-individual-studies … https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/appendix-vi-criteria-assessing-internal-validity-individual-studies
  12. 8 (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/methodsguide_chou_assessing_harms_when_comparing.pdf
    November 01, 2008 - Methods Reference Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews AssessingAssessing harms when comparing medical interventions. … Assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care Program. … Assessing harmful effects in systematic reviews. … Systematic reviews in health care: assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials.
  13. 8 (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/methods-guidance-harms_methods.pdf
    November 01, 2008 - Methods Reference Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews AssessingAssessing harms when comparing medical interventions. … Assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care Program. … Assessing harmful effects in systematic reviews. … Systematic reviews in health care: assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials.
  14. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/methods-guidance-tests-introduction_methods.pdf
    July 01, 2012 - Assessing the impact of a treatment is generally more straightforward than assessing the impact of a … Chapters 4 through 10 highlight specific issues in conducting reviews: searching, assessing quality … Assessing individual study quality (chapter 5) relates primarily to the degree to which the study is … In Chapter 5, we note several approaches to assessing the limitations of a study of a medical test and … Assessing applicability (Chapter 6) refers to determining whether the evidence identified is relevant
  15. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/administrative-data-validity/research
  16. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/grades-predictive-values_white-paper.pdf
    September 01, 2015 - Research White Paper - Assessing the Predictive Validity of Strength of Evidence Grades: A Meta-Epidemiological … Study Research White Paper Assessing the Predictive Validity of Strength … of Evidence Grades: A Meta-Epidemiological Study Research White Paper Assessing the Predictive … Assessing the Predictive Validity of Strength of Evidence Grades: A Meta-Epidemiological Study, Research … Assessing new biomarkers and predictive models for use in clinical practice: a clinician's guide.
  17. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/ehc-presentation-quantitative-synthesis-chapter-1.pdf
    July 01, 2019 - dx.doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3201 http://dx.doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3201 Decision to combine trials • Assessing … meta-analysis results should be presented, or just forest plots without pooled results ► Methods for assessing … http://www.training.cochrane.org/handbook Assessing statistical heterogeneity • I2: proportion of … D and E: Small number of studies Pooling decision tree: Step F Step F: Statistical heterogeneity Assessing
  18. M (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/methods-guidance-de-novo-processes_methods.pdf
    September 01, 2009 - Assessing the Relevance of Existing Systematic Reviews EPCs considering the inclusion of prior SRs … 6 Assessing and rating quality using discrete categorical choices can make quality judgments appear … Assessing the quality of reports of systematic reviews: the QUOROM statement compared to other … Assessing the quality of reports of systematic reviews: the QUORUM statement compared to other … This should be consistent with the chapter on assessing quality in the Methods Guide.
  19. M (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/systematicreviewsreplacedenovo.pdf
    September 01, 2009 - Assessing the Relevance of Existing Systematic Reviews EPCs considering the inclusion of prior SRs … 6 Assessing and rating quality using discrete categorical choices can make quality judgments appear … Assessing the quality of reports of systematic reviews: the QUOROM statement compared to other … Assessing the quality of reports of systematic reviews: the QUORUM statement compared to other … This should be consistent with the chapter on assessing quality in the Methods Guide.
  20. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/carbohydrate-intake-protocol.pdf
    April 08, 2024 - Assessing Nutritional Composition and Consumption of Human Milk and Human Milk Substitutes/Standard … Assessing Applicability of Medical Test Studies in Systematic Reviews. … Criteria for Assessing Internal Validity of Individual Studies. July 2017. … Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial. … Assessing Applicability V. References VI. Definition of Terms VII.

Search the AHRQ Archive

Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.

Search Archive

Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site

You selected to view results for the following site: