Results

Total Results: 2,658 records

Showing results for "assessing".

  1. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/rti-item-bank
    August 05, 2013 - Assessing Risk of Bias and Confounding in Observational Studies of Interventions or Exposures: Further … 09, 2012 Topic Initiated August 05, 2013 Research Report Assessing
  2. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/methods-guidance-reporting-bias
    November 18, 2013 - Finding Grey Literature Evidence and Assessing for Outcome and Analysis Reporting Biases When Comparing … November 18, 2013 Methods Guide – Chapter Finding Grey Literature Evidence and Assessing
  3. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/data-extraction-google
    April 19, 2012 - Assessing the Accuracy of Google Translate To Allow Data Extraction From Trials Published in Non-English … Language Trials With Google Translate January 25, 2013 Research Report Assessing
  4. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/methods-guidance-grading-evidence
    June 26, 2010 - Grading the Strength of a Body of Evidence When Assessing Health Care Interventions: An Update … 2013 Methods Guide – Chapter Grading the Strength of a Body of Evidence When Assessing
  5. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/product/pdf/assessing-the-risk-of-bias-in-systematic-reviews-of-health-care-interventions-01.pdf
    May 01, 2005 - Assessing the risk of bias of a study can be thought of as assessing the risk that the results are skewed … Assessing Applicability of Studies and the Body of Evidence? … Assessing the Credibility of Existing Systematic Reviews This guide focuses on assessing risk of bias … for Assessing Risk of Bias Direction and Magnitude of Bias Assessing the Credibility of Subgroup Analyses … Assessing the Risk of Bias for Harms Assessing the Credibility of Existing Systematic Reviews Reporting
  6. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/hro-protocol.pdf
    January 01, 2023 - We will identify toolkits without assessing or endorsing them. … Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies – of Interventions.10, 11 When assessing RCTs, we will use the 7 … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: A tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. … Criteria for assessing internal validity of individual studies [Internet]. Rockville (MD): U.S.
  7. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/chronic-cough/research
    January 07, 2013 - The comparative value of tools for assessing cough and the comparative effectiveness of treatments for … Results To evaluate instruments for assessing cough, we considered the dimensions of cough frequency … Seventy-eight studies (5,927 subjects) evaluated instruments for assessing cough. … Electronic recording devices are accurate for assessing cough frequency, but show variable correlation … Conclusions Several instruments for assessing cough severity, frequency, and impact on cough-specific
  8. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/mhs-IV-surgical-report-cards.pdf
    July 01, 2023 - What studies assessing the effectiveness and unintended effects of report cards and outcome measurements … We will identify toolkits without assessing or endorsing them. 6 Eligibility Criteria for … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non- randomised studies of interventions. … Criteria for Assessing Internal Validity of Individual Studies. U.S.
  9. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/cancer-pancreas/research
    September 23, 2014 - Further, we concluded that MDCT and MRI are similarly accurate with respect to both diagnosing and assessing … inconclusive, but we found low-strength evidence to conclude that PET/CT is more accurate than MDCT in assessing … The conclusions we did draw are as follows: MDCT and EUS-FNA have similar accuracy in assessing resectability … of undersizing the tumor); MDCT and MRI are similarly accurate with respect to both diagnosing and assessing … vessel involvement; and PET/CT is more accurate than MDCT in assessing distant metastases (slight advantages
  10. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/health-topics/health-occupations
    January 17, 2012 - White Paper September 30, 2013 Grading the Strength of a Body of Evidence When Assessing … Barriers to Patient Engagement (Session II) White Paper September 30, 2015 Assessing … Practice Center (EPC) Reports on Future Research Research Report June 10, 2011 Assessing
  11. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/deprescribing-protocol.pdf
    July 01, 2023 - We will identify toolkits without assessing or endorsing them. … Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies – of Interventions.21, 22 When assessing RCTs, we will use the 7 … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non- randomised studies of interventions. … Criteria for Assessing Internal Validity of Individual Studies. U.S.
  12. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/mhs4-computerized-cds-protocol.pdf
    May 08, 2023 - We will identify toolkits without assessing or endorsing them. … Of Bias In Non-randomized – Studies of Interventions.8, 9 When assessing RCTs, we will use the 7 … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. … Criteria for Assessing Internal Validity of Individual Studies. U.S.
  13. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/mhs-IV-sepsis.pdf
    July 01, 2023 - We will identify toolkits without assessing or endorsing them. … Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies – of Interventions.12, 13 When assessing RCTs, we will use the … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non- randomised studies of interventions. … Criteria for Assessing Internal Validity of Individual Studies. U.S.
  14. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/mhs4-opioid-stewardship-protocol.pdf
    July 01, 2023 - We will identify toolkits without assessing or endorsing them. … the risk of bias of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or the ROBINS-I tool for assessing the Risk … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. … Criteria for Assessing Internal Validity of Individual Studies. U.S.
  15. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/clinical-care-protocol.pdf
    January 01, 2024 - the risk of bias of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or the ROBINS-I tool for assessing the Risk … Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies – of Interventions.27, 28 When assessing RCTs, we will use the 7 … Criteria for Assessing Internal Validity of Individual Studies. U.S. … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non- randomised studies of interventions.
  16. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/fatigue-sleepiness-protocol.pdf
    July 01, 2023 - We will identify toolkits without assessing or endorsing them. … Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies – of Interventions.16, 17 When assessing RCTs, we will use the … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non- randomised studies of interventions. … Criteria for Assessing Internal Validity of Individual Studies. U.S.
  17. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/mhs4-implicit-bias-protocol.pdf
    August 04, 2023 - We will identify toolkits without assessing or endorsing them. … Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies – of Interventions.15,16 When assessing RCTs, we will use the 7 … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non- randomised studies of interventions. … Criteria for assessing internal validity of individual studies. Rockville (MD): U.S.
  18. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/machine-assisted-abstract-screening/methods-report
    November 15, 2019 - Assessing the Accuracy of Machine-Assisted Abstract Screening With DistillerAI: A User Study Research … Assessing the accuracy of machine-assisted abstract screening with DistrillerAI: a user study . … Assessing the Accuracy of Machine-Assisted Abstract Screening With DistillerAI: A User Study.
  19. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/mhs-IV-patient-family-engagement.pdf
    July 01, 2023 - We identified toolkits without assessing or endorsing them. … Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies – of Interventions.14, 15 When assessing RCTs, we will use the 7 … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. … Criteria for Assessing Internal Validity of Individual Studies. U.S.
  20. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/making-healthcare-safer-IV.pdf
    August 04, 2023 - We will identify toolkits without assessing or endorsing them. … Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions.17,18 When assessing RCTs, we will use the 7 … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non- randomised studies of interventions. … Criteria for assessing internal validity of individual studies [internet]. Rockville (MD): U.S.

Search the AHRQ Archive

Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.

Search Archive

Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site

You selected to view results for the following site: