-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/rti-item-bank
August 05, 2013 - Assessing Risk of Bias and Confounding in Observational Studies of Interventions or Exposures: Further … 09, 2012
Topic Initiated
August 05, 2013
Research Report
Assessing
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/methods-guidance-reporting-bias
November 18, 2013 - Finding Grey Literature Evidence and Assessing for Outcome and Analysis Reporting Biases When Comparing … November 18, 2013
Methods Guide – Chapter
Finding Grey Literature Evidence and Assessing
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/data-extraction-google
April 19, 2012 - Assessing the Accuracy of Google Translate To Allow Data Extraction From Trials Published in Non-English … Language Trials With Google Translate
January 25, 2013
Research Report
Assessing
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/methods-guidance-grading-evidence
June 26, 2010 - Grading the Strength of a Body of Evidence When Assessing Health Care Interventions: An Update … 2013
Methods Guide – Chapter
Grading the Strength of a Body of Evidence When Assessing
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/product/pdf/assessing-the-risk-of-bias-in-systematic-reviews-of-health-care-interventions-01.pdf
May 01, 2005 - Assessing the risk of bias of a study can
be thought of as assessing the risk that the results are skewed … Assessing
Applicability of
Studies and the
Body of Evidence? … Assessing the Credibility of Existing Systematic Reviews
This guide focuses on assessing risk of bias … for Assessing Risk of Bias
Direction and Magnitude of Bias
Assessing the Credibility of Subgroup Analyses … Assessing the Risk of Bias for Harms
Assessing the Credibility of Existing Systematic Reviews
Reporting
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/hro-protocol.pdf
January 01, 2023 - We will identify toolkits without assessing or
endorsing them. … Of Bias In
Non-randomized Studies – of Interventions.10, 11 When assessing RCTs, we will use the 7 … The Cochrane Collaboration's
tool for assessing risk of bias in
randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: A tool for assessing
risk of bias in non-randomised studies of
interventions. … Criteria for assessing internal validity of
individual studies [Internet]. Rockville
(MD): U.S.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/chronic-cough/research
January 07, 2013 - The comparative value of tools for assessing cough and the comparative effectiveness of treatments for … Results
To evaluate instruments for assessing cough, we considered the dimensions of cough frequency … Seventy-eight studies (5,927 subjects) evaluated instruments for assessing cough. … Electronic recording devices are accurate for assessing cough frequency, but show variable correlation … Conclusions
Several instruments for assessing cough severity, frequency, and impact on cough-specific
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/mhs-IV-surgical-report-cards.pdf
July 01, 2023 - What studies assessing the effectiveness and unintended effects of report cards and
outcome measurements … We will identify toolkits without assessing or
endorsing them.
6
Eligibility Criteria for … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing
risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-
randomised studies of interventions. … Criteria for Assessing Internal Validity of Individual Studies. U.S.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/cancer-pancreas/research
September 23, 2014 - Further, we concluded that MDCT and MRI are similarly accurate with respect to both diagnosing and assessing … inconclusive, but we found low-strength evidence to conclude that PET/CT is more accurate than MDCT in assessing … The conclusions we did draw are as follows: MDCT and EUS-FNA have similar accuracy in assessing resectability … of undersizing the tumor); MDCT and MRI are similarly accurate with respect to both diagnosing and assessing … vessel involvement; and PET/CT is more accurate than MDCT in assessing distant metastases (slight advantages
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/health-topics/health-occupations
January 17, 2012 - White Paper
September 30, 2013
Grading the Strength of a Body of Evidence When Assessing … Barriers to Patient Engagement (Session II)
White Paper
September 30, 2015
Assessing … Practice Center (EPC) Reports on Future Research
Research Report
June 10, 2011
Assessing
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/deprescribing-protocol.pdf
July 01, 2023 - We will identify toolkits without assessing or endorsing them. … Of Bias In Non-randomized
Studies – of Interventions.21, 22 When assessing RCTs, we will use the 7 … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing
risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-
randomised studies of interventions. … Criteria for Assessing Internal Validity of Individual Studies. U.S.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/mhs4-computerized-cds-protocol.pdf
May 08, 2023 - We will identify toolkits without assessing or
endorsing them. … Of Bias
In Non-randomized – Studies of Interventions.8, 9 When assessing RCTs, we will use
the 7 … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for
assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias
in non-randomised studies of interventions. … Criteria for Assessing Internal Validity of Individual
Studies. U.S.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/mhs-IV-sepsis.pdf
July 01, 2023 - We will identify toolkits without assessing or
endorsing them. … Of Bias In
Non-randomized Studies – of Interventions.12, 13 When assessing RCTs, we will use the … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk
of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-
randomised studies of interventions. … Criteria for Assessing
Internal Validity of Individual Studies. U.S.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/mhs4-opioid-stewardship-protocol.pdf
July 01, 2023 - We will identify toolkits without assessing or endorsing them. … the risk of bias of randomized
controlled trials (RCTs) or the ROBINS-I tool for assessing the Risk … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in
randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised
studies of interventions. … Criteria for Assessing Internal
Validity of Individual Studies. U.S.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/clinical-care-protocol.pdf
January 01, 2024 - the risk of bias of
randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or the ROBINS-I tool for assessing the Risk … Of Bias In
Non-randomized Studies – of Interventions.27, 28 When assessing RCTs, we will use the 7 … Criteria for Assessing
Internal Validity of Individual Studies. U.S. … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing
risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-
randomised studies of interventions.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/fatigue-sleepiness-protocol.pdf
July 01, 2023 - We will identify toolkits without assessing or
endorsing them. … Of
Bias In Non-randomized Studies – of Interventions.16, 17 When assessing RCTs, we will
use the … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk
of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-
randomised studies of interventions. … Criteria for Assessing Internal Validity of Individual Studies. U.S.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/mhs4-implicit-bias-protocol.pdf
August 04, 2023 - We will identify toolkits without assessing or endorsing them. … Of Bias In Non-randomized
Studies – of Interventions.15,16 When assessing RCTs, we will use the 7 … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk
of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-
randomised studies of interventions. … Criteria for assessing internal validity of individual studies. Rockville (MD): U.S.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/machine-assisted-abstract-screening/methods-report
November 15, 2019 - Assessing the Accuracy of Machine-Assisted Abstract Screening With DistillerAI: A User Study
Research … Assessing the accuracy of machine-assisted abstract screening with DistrillerAI: a user study . … Assessing the Accuracy of Machine-Assisted Abstract Screening With DistillerAI: A User Study.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/mhs-IV-patient-family-engagement.pdf
July 01, 2023 - We identified toolkits without assessing or endorsing them. … Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies – of
Interventions.14, 15 When assessing RCTs, we will use the 7 … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in
randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised
studies of interventions. … Criteria for Assessing Internal
Validity of Individual Studies. U.S.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/making-healthcare-safer-IV.pdf
August 04, 2023 - We will identify toolkits without assessing or endorsing them. … Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions.17,18
When assessing RCTs, we will use the 7 … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing
risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-
randomised studies of interventions. … Criteria for assessing
internal validity of individual studies [internet]. Rockville (MD): U.S.