Results

Total Results: 2,658 records

Showing results for "assessing".

  1. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/vitamin-d-calcium_research-protocol.pdf
    September 13, 2013 - status among patients, the U.S. and Canadian governments requested that the IOM review the literature assessing … the latter as a basis for making recommendations—reflecting, in part, the challenges associated with assessing … Further, assessing vitamin D intake is hampered by changing or insufficient information on fortification … Assessing Applicability As for evaluation the overall SOE, applicability will be assessed for each … Assessing the applicability of studies when comparing medical interventions.
  2. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/public-reporting-cost-measures_research-protocol.pdf
    January 13, 2014 - websites, will focus on methods for reporting the data gleaned from public websites and methods for assessing … calls will also inform our approach for the targeted literature review, which is primarily targeted at assessing … learned from our targeted literature review and discussion with key informants to determine methods for assessing … 2438 Israel BA, Eng E, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. (1998) Review of Community- Based Research: Assessing … Methods for assessing consumer-centeredness 6.
  3. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/patient-outcomes-symposium/executive
    May 03, 2012 - Small Assessing the Applicability of Trial Evidence to a Target Sample in the Presence of Heterogeneity
  4. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/atrial-fibrillation/research
    June 28, 2013 - Conclusions In assessing clinical outcomes associated with rate- versus rhythm-control strategies,
  5. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/worker-health_executive.pdf
    April 01, 2016 - What populations, work settings, intervention types, and outcomes have been included in studies assessing … For descriptive purposes relating to KQs 1, 4, 5, and 6, we included studies assessing an eligible … We determined the risk-of-bias ratings using the responses to all questions assessing the various types … Evidence was insufficient for assessing the effectiveness of integrated interventions for improving … Finally, future studies should consider assessing harms or potential unintended consequences of the
  6. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/stroke-atrial-fibrillation/research-protocol
    January 30, 2012 - Dabigatran (off-label usage) Comparators: KQ 1: Other clinical or imaging tools listed for assessing … thromboembolic risk KQ 2: Other clinical tools listed for assessing bleeding risk KQ 3: Other … Dabigatran (off-label usage) None Comparators KQ 1: Other clinical or imaging tools listed for assessingAssessing Applicability We will assess applicability across our key questions using the method described … Assessing applicability when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program
  7. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/uterine-fibroids/research-protocol
    February 29, 2016 - We will use prespecified questions 1 from Table 4 in " Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies … large sample size or that evaluate outcomes not addressed in other studies. 1 from Table 4 in "AssessingAssessing Applicability We will assess the applicability of findings reported in the included literature … Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions. … Grading the strength of a body of evidence when assessing health care interventions for the effective
  8. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/primary-research-design_research.pdf
    January 01, 2012 - Assessing Validity of Systematic Reviews Appendix B. … Box 2: Assessing relevance of a SR for the proposed study 1. … Box 3: Assessing internal validity of an existing SR 1. … Assessing the Impact of AHRQ Evidence- based Practice Center (EPC) Reports on Future Research. … Assessing Validity of Systematic Reviews Comprehensive Literature Search What is Best?
  9. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/nonopioid-chronic-pain/protocol
    March 01, 2019 - Information that will be abstracted that is relevant for assessing applicability will include the number … Comparative Effectiveness Review will be used in concordance with the approach recommended in the chapter, AssessingAssessing Applicability Applicability will be assessed in accordance with the AHRQ's Methods Guide, … Assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews of health care interventions. … Assessing applicability when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program
  10. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/nonopioid-pharm-chronic-pain-protocol.pdf
    February 01, 2019 - Information that will be abstracted that is relevant for assessing applicability will include the number … Comparative Effectiveness Review will be used in concordance with the approach recommended in the chapter, AssessingAssessing Applicability Applicability will be assessed in accordance with the AHRQ's Methods Guide, … Assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews of health care interventions. … Assessing applicability when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program
  11. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/acute-pain-ems-protocol-amendment.pdf
    January 28, 2019 - Assessing Applicability – We will consider elements of the PICOTS framework when evaluating the applicability … The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses … Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions; … Grading the Strength of a Body of Evidence When Assessing Health Care Interventions for the Effective
  12. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/stroke-afib-update/research-protocol
    July 07, 2017 - Data necessary for assessing quality and applicability, as described in the Methods Guide, 24 will also … For studies assessing diagnostic accuracy, we will use the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. … The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses.
  13. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/phenylketonuria_research-protocol.pdf
    March 29, 2011 - Grading the Evidence for Each Key Question Assessing the Strength of Evidence. … Assessing Applicability Assessing Applicability. … Assessment of Methodological Quality of Individual Studies Assessing Study Quality. … Grading the Evidence for Each Key Question Assessing the Strength of Evidence. … Assessing Applicability Assessing Applicability.
  14. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/grading.ppt
    January 01, 2013 - Not covered herein are tasks such as assessing the applicability of bodies of evidence (i.e., formally … Assessing directness clarifies the degree to which evidence between the intervention and the ultimate … *See the “Assessing Applicability” module Related Issue of Applicability Four Required Domains: … Procedures for Assessing Domains Use two or more reviewers with the appropriate clinical and methodological … Procedures for Assessing Domains Reviewers need not score strength of evidence for every comparison or
  15. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/breast-reconstruction-mastectomy/protocol
    June 18, 2020 - For the purpose of assessing for the presence of potential confounding in studies, we will consider as … Assessing Applicability: For each KQ (or specific subquestion), we will assess the applicability of … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. … Grading the strength of a body of evidence when assessing health care interventions: an EPC update.
  16. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/breast-reconstruction-mastectomy-protocol.pdf
    April 09, 2020 - For the purpose of assessing for the presence of potential confounding in studies, we will consider … Assessing Applicability: For each KQ (or specific subquestion), we will assess the applicability of the … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non- randomised studies of interventions. … Grading the strength of a body of evidence when assessing health care interventions: an EPC update.
  17. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/fiber-intake-protocol.pdf
    August 15, 2023 - Assessing Applicability We will assess applicability in terms of generalizability to the general population … Chronic Constipation in the United States: Results From a Population-Based Survey Assessing Healthcare … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … Grading the Strength of Evidence for Each Outcome Assessing Applicability IV. References V.
  18. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/prostate-cancer-therapies-summary.pdf
    September 01, 2020 - Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.
  19. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/prostate-cancer-therapies-summary.pdf
    September 01, 2020 - Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.
  20. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/ehc-presentation-quantitative-synthesis-learning-objectives-recommendations.pdf
    July 01, 2019 - AHRQ series paper 4: assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the effective health-care … ‘Unqualified Success’ and ‘Unmitigated Failure’ Number-Needed-to-Treat-Related Concepts for AssessingAssessing Evidence Inconsistency in Mixed Treatment Comparisons J Am Stat Assoc. 2006;101(20):447-59

Search the AHRQ Archive

Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.

Search Archive

Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site

You selected to view results for the following site: