Results

Total Results: 1,976 records

Showing results for "assessing".

  1. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/ehc-presentation-quantitative-synthesis-learning-objectives-recommendations.pdf
    July 01, 2019 - AHRQ series paper 4: assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the effective health-care … ‘Unqualified Success’ and ‘Unmitigated Failure’ Number-Needed-to-Treat-Related Concepts for AssessingAssessing Evidence Inconsistency in Mixed Treatment Comparisons J Am Stat Assoc. 2006;101(20):447-59
  2. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/prostate-cancer-therapies-summary.pdf
    September 01, 2020 - Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.
  3. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/product/pdf/mmm-draft-protocol-amendment.pdf
    February 02, 2022 - Our scope does not include assessing the effectiveness of interventions aimed at improving maternal … Other factors we may consider in assessing strength of evidence include dose-response relationship, … Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. … Grading the strength of a body of evidence when assessing health care interventions for the effective
  4. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/grading.ppt
    January 01, 2013 - Not covered herein are tasks such as assessing the applicability of bodies of evidence (i.e., formally … Assessing directness clarifies the degree to which evidence between the intervention and the ultimate … *See the “Assessing Applicability” module Related Issue of Applicability Four Required Domains: … Procedures for Assessing Domains Use two or more reviewers with the appropriate clinical and methodological … Procedures for Assessing Domains Reviewers need not score strength of evidence for every comparison or
  5. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/phenylketonuria_research-protocol.pdf
    March 29, 2011 - Grading the Evidence for Each Key Question Assessing the Strength of Evidence. … Assessing Applicability Assessing Applicability. … Assessment of Methodological Quality of Individual Studies Assessing Study Quality. … Grading the Evidence for Each Key Question Assessing the Strength of Evidence. … Assessing Applicability Assessing Applicability.
  6. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/anal-cancer-protocol.pdf
    September 26, 2023 - Assessing Applicability Applicability of studies is generally determined according to the PICOTS … RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. … Assessing the Applicability of Studies When Comparing Medical Interventions. 2010 Dec 30. … AHRQ Methods for Effective Health Care Grading the Strength of a Body of Evidence When Assessing Health
  7. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/pressure-ulcer-prevention_research-protocol.pdf
    January 10, 2012 - trials assessed preventive interventions targeting impaired mobility, with the remaining trials assessing … These criteria and methods will be used in conjunction with the approach recommended in the chapter, AssessingAssessing Applicability Applicability will be estimated by examining the characteristics of the … Assessing the risk of bias of individual studies when comparing medical interventions. … Available at: http://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/ehc/products/322/714/Assessing%20the%20Risk%20of
  8. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/nonopioid-pharm-chronic-pain-protocol.pdf
    February 01, 2019 - Information that will be abstracted that is relevant for assessing applicability will include the number … Comparative Effectiveness Review will be used in concordance with the approach recommended in the chapter, AssessingAssessing Applicability Applicability will be assessed in accordance with the AHRQ's Methods Guide, … Assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews of health care interventions. … Assessing applicability when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program
  9. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/comparator-selection-in-observational-chapter-5.pptx
    January 01, 2013 - Example: In a study assessing the risk of cancer in statin users, an active comparator group of patients … for the same indication as the exposure treatment will typically be used as the comparison group for assessing … Sensitivity analyses assessing the impact of healthy user bias are necessary. … accounted for, lag times between date of initial diagnosis and date of treatment may create bias in studies assessing … For example, when assessing comparative survival after heart transplantation, there is a waiting time
  10. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/acute-pain-ems-protocol-amendment.pdf
    January 28, 2019 - Assessing Applicability – We will consider elements of the PICOTS framework when evaluating the applicability … The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses … Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions; … Grading the Strength of a Body of Evidence When Assessing Health Care Interventions for the Effective
  11. Untitled (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/thromboembolism-update_research-protocol.pdf
    February 17, 2016 - and Outcomes: We will grade the strength of the body of evidence as per the AHRQ methods guide on assessingAssessing Applicability: We will assess the applicability within and across studies with reference to … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses … AHRQ Methods for Effective Health Care: Grading the Strength of a Body of Evidence When Assessing Health
  12. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cerebral-palsy-feeding_executive.pdf
    March 01, 2013 - One study assessing outcomes by the presence of fundoplication suggested that use of antibiotics and … Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. … Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. … Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.
  13. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/mgmt-hnhc-patients-protocol.pdf
    November 07, 2019 - Realist Review: Quality Appraisal Quality appraisal in realistic reviews is not focused on assessing … the risk of bias of individual studies but rather on assessing the rigor used to develop one or more … In realist reviews, assessing study rigor occurs throughout the process of synthesis and includes all … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. … Grading the strength of a body of evidence when assessing health care interventions: an EPC update.
  14. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/cognitive-decline_executive.pdf
    March 01, 2017 - a risk factor of concern but it can be studied only in the context of prevention/intervention by assessingAssessing the strength of evidence for negative findings is a special challenge. … Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions … Grading the strength of a body of evidence when assessing health care interventions: an EPC update. … Assessing the applicability of studies when comparing medical interventions.
  15. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cad-women-diagnosis_executive.pdf
    June 01, 2012 - Summary: • We found 8 studies assessing risk stratification and prognostic information, 2 studies … Studies assessing outcomes beyond diagnostic accuracy. … Many studies assessing the comparative diagnostic accuracy of an NIT modality with another NIT modality … Assessing clinical and demographic factors that influence diagnostic accuracy. … Assessing applicability when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program
  16. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cognitive-decline_executive.pdf
    March 01, 2017 - a risk factor of concern but it can be studied only in the context of prevention/intervention by assessingAssessing the strength of evidence for negative findings is a special challenge. … Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions … Grading the strength of a body of evidence when assessing health care interventions: an EPC update. … Assessing the applicability of studies when comparing medical interventions.
  17. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/chronic-cough_disposition-comments.pdf
    January 07, 2013 - We now clarify that electronic recording devices are accurate for assessing cough frequency, but they … Whilst specific studies haven’t set out to validate cough VAS, many have included them when assessing … discussion of electronic recording devices has been amended to reflect this possible weakness in assessing … While We agree that there is currently no gold standard for assessing cough. … We had an operational definition that was used in assessing the articles for inclusion and exclusion
  18. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/antenatal-care.pdf
    January 01, 2020 - We will assess the SoE for the qualitative studies using the GRADE-CERQual tool.22, 34 Assessing … Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series-paper 3: methods for assessing … Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series-paper 4: methods for assessing … RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non- randomised studies of interventions.
  19. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/disruptive-behavior-disorders-protocol-amendment.pdf
    March 22, 2023 - assessed using a priori established criteria consistent with the approach recommended in the chapter, Assessing … These criteria and methods will be used in concordance with the approach recommended in the chapter, Assessing … a given intervention- outcome pair, we follow the additional guidance on weighting RCTs over NRSIs, assessingAssessing Applicability: Applicability refers to the degree to which study participants are similar … Assessing the Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions.
  20. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/primary-healthcare-spending-technical-brief-protocol.pdf
    January 01, 2023 - Although most approaches to assessing primary care spending start by stating a definition, this has … employed; and 5) expert consensus, which we will use to inform our search strategy and guide us in assessingAssessing the health benefits of advice services: using research evidence and logic model methods

Search the AHRQ Archive

Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.

Search Archive

Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site

You selected to view results for the following site: