Results

Total Results: 1,963 records

Showing results for "assessing".

  1. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/product/pdf/methods-guide-inclusion-nonrandomized-studies.pdf
    September 01, 2022 - Assessing the quality of single-group NRSIs is beyond the scope of the current guidance. … Assessing the Risk of Bias in NRSIs Existing instruments for assessing the risk of bias in NRSIs89, … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. … Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial. … Assessing the Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions.
  2. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/ems-911-workforce-mental-health-protocol-amendment.pdf
    January 22, 2024 - Assessing Applicability: For each KQ, we will assess the applicability of the included studies to … The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. Bmj. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non- randomised studies of interventions. Bmj. … Grading the strength of a body of evidence when assessing health care interventions: an EPC update.
  3. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/methods-guidance-reporting-bias_methods.pdf
    November 01, 2013 - Methods Guide for Comparative Effectiveness Reviews Finding Grey Literature Evidence and Assessing … Finding Grey Literature Evidence and Assessing for Outcome and Analysis Reporting Biases When Comparing … While we considered techniques for assessing the likelihood of publication bias outside the scope of … Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JTP, Green S, eds. … Assessing the potential for outcome reporting bias in a review: a tutorial. Trials. 2010;11:52.
  4. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/breastfeeding_research-protocol.pdf
    January 01, 2020 - For studies assessing the effectiveness of BFHI, we will include studies evaluating full and partial … Relevant information that we will abstract for assessing applicability will include the characteristics … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non- randomised studies of interventions. … Grading the strength of a body of evidence when assessing health care interventions: an EPC update. … Assessing applicability when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program
  5. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/hro-rapid-research.pdf
    May 01, 2025 - We identified toolkits without assessing or endorsing them. … Review Question about the effectiveness of PSPs, the primary reviewer used the ROBINS-I tool for assessingAssessing the HRO: Tools and techniques to determine the high-reliability state of an organization. … ROBINS-I: A tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. … Criteria for assessing internal validity of individual studies [Internet]. Rockville, MD: U.S.
  6. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/product/pdf/respectful-maternity-care-protocol.pdf
    September 16, 2022 - Similar to the approach for assessing risk of bias for individual studies, the strength of evidence … 13 guidance on weighting RCTs over observational studies, assessingAssessing the Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions. … Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial. … Assessing applicability when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program
  7. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/plant-based-treatments-revised-protocol.pdf
    March 29, 2023 - We do not anticipate excluding observational studies assessing harms. … Information that will be abstracted that is relevant for assessing applicability will include the number … effect changes categories (small/slight, moderate, large), or • The direction of effect changes Assessing … Grading the strength of a body of evidence when assessing health care interventions: an EPC update. … Assessing applicability when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program
  8. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/ehc-depression-research-protocol.pdf
    February 07, 2018 - The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses … Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions; … Grading the Strength of a Body of Evidence When Assessing Health Care Interventions for the Effective … Assessing the Applicability of Studies When Comparing Medical Interventions; 2010.
  9. Layout 1 (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/pelvic-pain_executive.pdf
    January 01, 2012 - TEP to provide input during the project on issues such as setting inclusion/exclusion criteria and assessing … We established methods for assessing the strength of evidence based on AHRQ’s Methods Guide for Effectiveness … this KQ about the prevalence of comorbidities; the strength of evidence evaluation was designed for assessing … risk of developing CPP; understanding of myofascial dysfunction and visceral hyperplasia in CPP; and assessing … treatment, including acupuncture, psychotherapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, and patient education • Assessing
  10. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/undescended-testicle_research-protocol.pdf
    September 02, 2011 - incorporate relevant information from grey literature searches into the review as appropriate (i.e., for assessing … For randomized controlled trials, the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias will … Assessing Applicability Our team will assess the applicability of findings reported in the included … Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. … The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analysis
  11. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/ptsd-5-final-report-update-2024-executive-summ.pdf
    January 01, 2024 - One team member assessed RoB using Cochrane’s RoB 2: A Revised Tool for Assessing Risk of Bias in Randomized … RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.
  12. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/pharma-nonpharma-ptsd-2023-update-executive-summ.pdf
    January 01, 2023 - An investigator assessed RoB for newly added studies using Cochrane’s RoB 2: A Revised Tool for Assessing … RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.
  13. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/structured-handoff-rapid-research.pdf
    January 01, 2025 - Preventive Services Task Force Methods Workgroup22 for assessing the quality of systematic reviews: … We identified toolkits without assessing or endorsing them. … Criteria for Assessing Internal Validity of Individual Studies. U.S. … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS- I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non- randomised studies of interventions.
  14. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/prostate-cancer-therapies-update_research-protocol.pdf
    April 01, 2013 - Staging is the process of assessing whether the cancer is confined within the prostate gland or has … Assessing the risk of bias of individual studies in systematic reviews of health care interventions … Assessing the amount of heterogeneity in random-effects meta-analysis. … Undue reliance on I(2) in assessing heterogeneity may mislead. … Assessing the applicability of studies when comparing medical interventions.
  15. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/ocr-protocol-final_1.pdf
    December 18, 2019 - Information that will be abstracted that is relevant for assessing applicability will include the description … Assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews of health care interventions. … Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial. … Randomized Clinical Trials and Observational Studies: Guidelines for Assessing Respective Strengths … Assessing applicability when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program
  16. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/ehc-protocol-acute-pain-treatments.pdf
    August 08, 2019 - prior to discharge, whereas in outpatient clinic settings, timing of presentation is variable, and assessing … Study design All KQs: RCTs; in addition: e. cohort studies (for long-term opioid use) f. studies assessing … diagnostic accuracy h. cohort studies and before-after studies assessing effects on prescribing rates … Information that will be abstracted that is relevant for assessing applicability will include the number … Assessing applicability when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program
  17. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/carbohydrate-intake-prepub-final-research-table-rct.xlsx
    May 29, 2025 - age; ≤10% difference between groups on key variables) For yes: Must be stated, e.g., if interviewer assessing
  18. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/bipolar-disorder-treatment_research-protocol.pdf
    June 23, 2014 - We will assess harms as dichotomous variables to acknowledge the inherent difficulties of assessing … Other factors that may be considered in assessing strength of evidence include dose- response relationship … Assessing Applicability Bipolar research generally draws from highly defined populations, resulting … Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. … Assessing the Applicability of Studies When Comparing Medical Interventions. 2010.
  19. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/grading.ppt
    January 01, 2010 - Not covered herein are tasks such as assessing the applicability of bodies of evidence (i.e., formally … of Bias Four Required Domains: Risk of Bias The risk of bias for an evidence base is derived from assessingAssessing directness clarifies the degree to which evidence between the intervention and the ultimate … Related Issue of Applicability* *See the “Assessing Applicability” module Related Issue of Applicability … Procedures for Assessing Domains Procedures for Assessing Domains Reviewers need not score strength
  20. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/ehc-presentation-quantitative-synthesis-chapter-5.pdf
    February 01, 2018 - Assessing Evidence Inconsistency in Mixed Treatment Comparisons J Am Stat Assoc. 2006;101(20):447-59 … Assessing consistency • NMA generates results for all pairwise comparisons, but only closed loops enable … Assessing Evidence Inconsistency in Mixed Treatment Comparisons J Am Stat Assoc. 2006;101(20):447-59 … Bayesian NMA models Bayesian NMA models Arm-based, contrast-based models Arm-based models in NMA Assessing

Search the AHRQ Archive

Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.

Search Archive

Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site

You selected to view results for the following site: