-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/diabetes-claims-data/research
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/methods-guidance-grading-evidence
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/ehc-presentation-selection-harms-systematic-reviews.pdf
February 01, 2018 - This module focuses on assessing the quality of individual studies. … Have good rationale for assessing harms post-
hoc
10. … Have good rationale for assessing harms post-hoc
10. … The outcomes rated highest priority are the ones that the group will focus on in assessing the balance … Have good rationale for assessing harms post-hoc
10.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/multiple-sclerosis_research-protocol.pdf
December 17, 2013 - Other
factors that may be considered in assessing strength of evidence include dose-response
relationship … Assessing Applicability. … Chapter 8:
Assessing risk of bias in included studies.
In: Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. … Grading the strength of a body of
evidence when assessing health care
interventions--AHRQ and the effective … Assessing the Applicability of Studies When
Comparing Medical Interventions. 2010.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cancer-pancreas_executive.pdf
September 01, 2014 - The two key factors in assessing resectability
are distant metastasis (which excludes resectability) … )
• For MRI, in assessing the resectability of tumors in
patients with unstaged disease, one systematic … The third conclusion,
based on two studies, was that PET/CT is more accurate in
assessing distant … • One low-quality systematic review reported on MR
for assessing vascular invasion, concluding it had … • Based on two studies, PET/CT is more accurate than
MDCT in assessing distant metastases of pancreatic
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/methods-guidance-tests-genetic_methods.pdf
July 01, 2012 - a
disorder.”3 Penetrance is a key factor in determining the future risk of developing disease and
assessing … For example, there are different considerations when
assessing tumor genomes as opposed to human genomes … Principle 4: Consult with experts to determine which technical issues are important to address in assessing … Questions for assessing preanalytic, analytic, and postanalytic factors for evaluating
predictive genetic … Assessing the
probability that a positive report is false: an
approach for molecular epidemiology studies
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/cancer-end-of-life-measures-framework_research.pdf
April 01, 2010 - A
framework for assessing quality indicators for cancer care at the end of life. … A
framework for assessing quality indicators for cancer care at the end of life. … The framework
describes five steps for developing and assessing a quality indicator for end-of-life … Framework Overview
Figure 1 displays the proposed framework for assessing cancer quality indicators … Framework for developing and assessing quality indicators for cancer care at the end-of-life
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/cancer-quality-indicator-framework_research.pdf
April 01, 2010 - A
framework for assessing quality indicators for cancer care at the end of life. … A
framework for assessing quality indicators for cancer care at the end of life. … The framework
describes five steps for developing and assessing a quality indicator for end-of-life … Framework Overview
Figure 1 displays the proposed framework for assessing cancer quality indicators … Framework for developing and assessing quality indicators for cancer care at the end-of-life
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/schizophrenia-adult_research-protocol.pdf
September 23, 2016 - Assessing Key Question 2 Interventions for Evidence Sufficiency
Prior to synthesizing evidence for … Assessing Applicability –
Applicability will be considered according to the approach described in … Assessing evidence inconsistency in mixed treatment comparisons. … Grading the Strength of a Body of EvidenceWhen
Assessing Health Care Interventions for the Effective … adds
a preliminary step of
assessing the
intervention area for
evidence sufficiency
based on a
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/pqmp-protocol.pdf
April 01, 2014 - We will use the criteria developed by the USPSTF
Methods Workgroup17 for assessing the quality of systematic … When assessing randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we will use
6
6
the seven items in the … US Preventive Services Task Force Procedure Manual: appendix VI: criteria for
assessing internal validity … The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing
risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-
randomised studies of interventions. bmj. 2016;355
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/predictors-trauma-care_research-protocol.pdf
May 31, 2017 - We include three different approaches to assessing predictive utility: (1) adjusted
risk estimates ( … Assessing bias in studies of prognostic
factors. … Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual
Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions. … Chapter 6: Assessing applicability of medical test studies in
systematic reviews. … We
include three
different approaches
to assessing
predictive utility: (1)
adjusted risk
estimates
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/disparities-quality-improvement_research-protocol.pdf
February 23, 2012 - Assessment of Methodologic Quality of Individual Studies
Assessing Study Quality. … Grading the Evidence for Each Intervention
Assessing the Strength of Evidence. … Assessing Applicability
Our team will assess the applicability of the results gathered from the … The choice of referent group will be evaluated when
assessing applicability. … Assessing the Applicability of Studies When Comparing Medical
Interventions.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/suicidal-thoughts-young-people-amendement-may-2025.pdf
January 01, 2025 - per the Evidence-based Practice
Center (EPC) Methods Guide for Comparative Effectiveness Reviews on assessing … Assessing Applicability
We will follow the procedures outlined in the EPC Methods Guide for Comparative … RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in
randomised trials. … The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing
the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses … Studies
Data Synthesis
Grading the Strength of Evidence (SOE) for Major Comparisons and Outcomes
Assessing
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/chronic-kidney-disease-anemia/research
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/suicidal-thoughts-young-people-draft-protocol.pdf
March 14, 2024 - per the Evidence-based Practice
Center (EPC) Methods Guide for Comparative Effectiveness Reviews on assessing … Assessing Applicability
We will follow the procedures outlined in the EPC Methods Guide for Comparative … RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in
randomised trials. … The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the
quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses … Studies
Data Synthesis
Grading the Strength of Evidence (SOE) for Major Comparisons and Outcomes
Assessing
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/risk-cardiovascular-disease.pdf
January 01, 2023 - sex, race/ethnicity, country), intervention, comparisons,
5
outcomes, and related items for assessing … and Outcomes
We will grade the strength of the body of evidence (SOE) per the EPC methods guide on
assessing … Assessing Applicability
Applicability is limited to the general population.
IV. … RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in
randomised trials. … Assessing Applicability
IV. References
V. Definition of Terms
VI.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/effect-dietary-digestible.pdf
January 01, 2021 - e.g., age, sex, race/ethnicity, country), intervention, comparisons,
outcomes, and related items for assessing … and Outcomes
We will grade the strength of the body of evidence (SOE) per the EPC methods guide on
assessing … Assessing Applicability
Applicability is limited to the general population.
7
IV. … RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in
randomised trials. … Assessing Applicability
IV. References
V. Definition of Terms
VI.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/child-growth-development-outcomes-protocol-amended.pdf
November 18, 2024 - Assessing Dietary Intake during Pregnancy, Lactation, Infancy, Childhood, and
Adolescence
Assessing … priori established criteria consistent with the approach recommended in the Methods
Guide chapter Assessing … Criteria for assessing the risk of bias of individual studies50
Rating Description and Criteria
Low … with
quantitative (meta-analyses) or qualitative (narrative) data where appropriate.
15
Assessing … Assessing Applicability of Medical Test Studies in
Systematic Reviews.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/breastfeeding-health-outcomes-protocol.pdf
February 01, 2023 - ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in
non-randomised studies of interventions. … Assessing the Risk of Bias in Systematic
Reviews of Health Care Interventions. … Recommendations for assessing the risk
of bias in systematic reviews of health-care interventions. … The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing
the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses … Grading the strength of a body of evidence when
assessing health care interventions: an EPC update.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/pdf/child-growth-development-outcomes-protocol.pdf
August 19, 2024 - Assessing Dietary Intake during Pregnancy, Lactation, Infancy, Childhood, and
Adolescence
Assessing … priori established criteria consistent with the approach recommended in
the Methods Guide chapter Assessing … Criteria for assessing the risk of bias of individual studies51
Rating Description and Criteria
Low … Assessing Applicability
Applicability will be assessed using the PICOTs framework, in accordance with … Assessing Applicability of Medical Test Studies
in Systematic Reviews.