Results

Total Results: 2,937 records

Showing results for "assessing".

  1. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/products/high-risk-drugs/protocol
    September 01, 2023 - We will identify toolkits without assessing or endorsing them. … Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies – of Interventions. 13 When assessing RCTs, we will use the 7 items … The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised  trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of  interventions. … Criteria for assessing internal validity of individual studies . U.S.
  2. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/products/mhs4-patient-family-engagement/protocol
    September 01, 2023 - We identified toolkits without assessing or endorsing them. … the risk of bias of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or the ROBINS-I tool for assessing the Risk … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. … Criteria for Assessing Internal Validity of Individual Studies . U.S.
  3. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/health-topics/evidence-based-practice
    November 04, 2021 - 2018 Evidence Reviews for Federal Agencies Research Report September 14, 2018 Assessing … Evidence Methods Guide – Chapter November 18, 2013 Finding Grey Literature Evidence and Assessing … Systematic Reviews of Medical Tests Methods Guide – Chapter June 1, 2012 Chapter 5: Assessing
  4. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/selecting-evidence.ppt
    January 01, 2010 - harms than for assessing benefits. … Assessing harms can be difficult. … Assessing harms can be difficult. … Reviewers should routinely include head-to-head and placebo-controlled RCTs in assessing harms. … In assessing benefits, reviewers should consider two questions: 1.
  5. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/selecting-evidence.ppt
    January 01, 2010 - harms than for assessing benefits. … Assessing harms can be difficult. … Assessing harms can be difficult. … Reviewers should routinely include head-to-head and placebo-controlled RCTs in assessing harms. … In assessing benefits, reviewers should consider two questions: 1.
  6. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/products/sepsis/protocol
    September 01, 2023 - We will identify toolkits without assessing or endorsing them. … the risk of bias of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or the ROBINS-I tool for assessing the Risk … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. … Criteria for Assessing Internal Validity of Individual Studies . U.S.
  7. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/products/mhs4-active-infection/protocol
    September 01, 2023 - We will identify toolkits without assessing or endorsing them. … the risk of bias of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or the ROBINS-I tool for assessing the Risk … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. … Criteria for assessing internal validity of individual studies [internet]. Rockville (MD): U.S.
  8. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/products/diabetes-claims-data/research
    November 01, 2017 - Evidence Reports Use of Electronic Medical Records and Administrative Claims Data for Assessing … Use of Electronic Medical Records and Administrative Claims Data for Assessing … For the clinical goal of assessing medication use in DMT2 patients, we focused on patients with adverse … Project Timeline Use of Electronic Medical Records and Administrative Claims Data for Assessing Type … Research Report: Use of Electronic Medical Records and Administrative Claims Data for Assessing
  9. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/products/methods-guidance-tests-applicability/methods
    December 01, 2019 - FAQs Home Evidence Reports Chapter 6: Assessing … The EPCs use four principles for assessing and reporting applicability of individual studies and the … Exclude a priori if key element crucial to assessing intended use is missing. … Suggested citation: Hartmann KE, Matchar DB, Chang S, Assessing applicability of medical test studies … Project Timeline Assessing Applicability of Medical Test Studies in Systematic Reviews Nov 4, 2010
  10. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/products/clinical-care/protocol
    August 01, 2024 - We will identify toolkits without assessing or endorsing them. … the risk of bias of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or the ROBINS-I tool for assessing the Risk … Criteria for Assessing Internal Validity of Individual Studies . U.S. … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.
  11. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/methods-guidance-tests-bias_methods.pdf
    July 01, 2012 - Methods Guide for Medical Test Reviews 5-1 Chapter 5 Assessing Risk of Bias as a Domain of Quality … Matchar, M.D., Duke University; Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore Abstract Assessing … Risk: Low/High/Unclear *Questions related to assessing applicability were excluded here. … Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. … Assessing risk of bias as a domain of quality in medical test studies.
  12. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/methods-balancing-harms-benefits_research-2012.pdf
    January 01, 2012 - Quantitative approaches exist for assessing benefits and harms, but it is unclear whether they are … benefits and harms, (3) to determine the role of values and preferences in assessing benefits and … harms across each step of a systematic review and (4) to formulate principles for assessing benefits … The process of assessing benefits and harms relies on several steps: 2 Figure 1. … and Harm Influence of Values and Preferences in Assessing Benefits and Harms Principles for Assessing
  13. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/selecting-evidence-quiz.ppt
    September 02, 2013 - Cross-sectional studies Cohort and case-control studies What Types of Observational Studies Are Best for Assessing … What Types of Observational Studies Are Best for Assessing Harms In the absence of sufficient trial … A type of detection bias A type of attrition bias A type of selection bias Assessing Bias in Observational … Studies Assessing Bias in Observational Studies What is confounding by indication? … When assessing harms in comparative effectiveness reviews, investigators should routinely include cohort
  14. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/selecting-evidence-quiz.ppt
    September 02, 2013 - Cross-sectional studies Cohort and case-control studies What Types of Observational Studies Are Best for Assessing … What Types of Observational Studies Are Best for Assessing Harms In the absence of sufficient trial … A type of detection bias A type of attrition bias A type of selection bias Assessing Bias in Observational … Studies Assessing Bias in Observational Studies What is confounding by indication? … When assessing harms in comparative effectiveness reviews, investigators should routinely include cohort
  15. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/products/methods-guidance-principles/methods
    December 01, 2019 - Topics included assessing beneficial8 or harmful effects of interventions, 9 using observational studies … , 10 assessing diagnostic tests 11 or therapeutic devices, 12 and others. … A weakly developed approach to assessing the strength of evidence and a desire to begin to reconcile … Assessing the applicability of studies. Assessing harms. Assessing the quality of studies. … The promise of risk-based allocation trials in assessing new treatments [editorial].
  16. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/products/structured-handoff/protocol
    August 01, 2024 - We will identify toolkits without assessing or endorsing them. … the risk of bias of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or the ROBINS-I tool for assessing the Risk … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. … Criteria for Assessing Internal Validity of Individual Studies . U.S.
  17. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/products/engaging-caregivers-mhs4/protocol
    August 01, 2023 - We will identify toolkits without assessing or endorsing them. … the risk of bias of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or the ROBINS-I tool for assessing the Risk … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. … Criteria for assessing internal validity of individual studies [internet]. Rockville (MD): U.S.
  18. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/products/patient-monitoring-systems/protocol
    August 01, 2024 - We will identify toolkits without assessing or endorsing them.   … the risk of bias of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or the ROBINS-I tool for assessing the Risk … Criteria for Assessing Internal Validity of Individual Studies . U.S. … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.
  19. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/products/mhs4-hcw-training/protocol
    September 01, 2023 - We will identify toolkits without assessing or endorsing them.  … the risk of bias of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or the ROBINS-I tool for assessing the Risk … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. … Criteria for assessing internal validity of individual studies . Rockville (MD): U.S.
  20. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/products/fatigue-sleepiness/protocol
    September 01, 2023 - We will identify toolkits without assessing or endorsing them. … the risk of bias of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or the ROBINS-I tool for assessing the Risk … The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. … ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. … Criteria for Assessing Internal Validity of Individual Studies . U.S.

Search the AHRQ Archive

Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.

Search Archive

Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site

You selected to view results for the following site: