-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/cancer-pancreas_research-protocol.pdf
August 09, 2013 - In the table, population P1 is symptomatic patients being assessed for possible
pancreatic adenocarcinoma … Were patients assessed by a reference standard regardless of the test’s results?
10. … Were all patients assessed by the same reference standard regardless of the test’s results?
11. … Was the individual study quality assessed?
7a. … Was the likelihood of publication bias assessed?
10.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/migraine-prevention_executive.pdf
June 01, 2013 - We assessed
errors by comparing established ranges for each variable
and data charts from the original … We abstracted the time when the
outcomes were assessed as weeks from randomization and
time of followup … We assessed
heterogeneity in results with chi-square and I-squared
tests. … Grading the Evidence for Each Key Question
We assessed strength of evidence according to risk of bias … of clinically important
improvement in migraine-related disability, and quality
of life.23 We also assessed
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/depression-pregnancy-postpartum_executive.pdf
July 01, 2014 - Study Selection
Two reviewers independently assessed titles and abstracts
of publications identified … Two reviewers assessed potentially relevant full
text. … Risk-of-Bias Assessment of Individual Studies
We assessed the risk of bias (internal validity) based … Applicability
We assessed applicability by examining the characteristics
of the enrolled populations … Additionally, we
formally assessed the risk of bias in individual studies and
graded the strength of
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/depression-postpartum-screening_research-protocol.pdf
May 01, 2013 - For all
studies, the overall study quality will be assessed as follows:
• Good (low risk of bias … Grading the Evidence for Each Key Question
We will grade the strength of evidence for each outcome assessed … The
strength of evidence will be assessed by using the approach described in the Methods
Guides.30,31,38 … Any additional screening instruments identified during
the review will be assessed for validity against … The strength of evidence will be assessed by using the approach described in the Methods Guides.30,31,38
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/abnormal-uterine-bleeding_executive.pdf
March 01, 2013 - Quality (Risk of Bias) Assessment
We assessed quality of RCTs using the Cochrane
Collaboration Risk … Two independent reviewers assessed risk
of bias as low, high, or unclear for each domain. … Applicability
We assessed applicability of the results from the literature
to the population of women … Overall, 68 percent of women
taking the COC achieved excellent or good cycle control
as assessed by … treated for 3 to
6 months and at higher rates with longer use.105-107
However, the majority of use assessed
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/head-neck-cancer-update_executive.pdf
December 01, 2014 - For this update, we reviewed and
assessed new evidence on the comparative
effectiveness of 3DCRT, IMRT … A second reviewer assessed
the data extraction against the original articles for quality
control. … Grading the Strength of Evidence for Individual
Comparisons and Outcomes
Studies were assessed for … Assessing Applicability
We assessed applicability of findings with the AHRQ
Methods Guide using the … Key Points
Key points are—
• As we found in CER No. 20, comparative evidence
assessed in this update
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/diabetes-update-2015_executive.pdf
January 01, 2015 - *Not every outcome was assessed for each comparison. … Risk-of-Bias Assessment of Individual Studies
Two independent reviewers assessed risk of bias. … We separately assessed
the strength of evidence for shorter and longer studies (≥2
years); however, … we assessed strength of evidence only for
longer studies from which we could draw a conclusion. … We assessed the study limitations, consistency, directness,
precision, and reporting bias.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/structured-handoff-protocol.pdf
December 31, 2024 - published in the last 10
years in English and performed in the United States, and having each study assessed … To be included, a structured handoff tool needs to be
assessed in more than 1 study or setting (i.e
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/depression-brain-injury-surveillance-160902.pdf
January 30, 2014 - If"we"found"some"new"evidence"that"might"change"the"systematic"review"conclusion,"
and"/or"a"minority"of"responding"experts"assessed"the"systematic"review"conclusion"as … "
"
In"order"to"answer"KQ2,"studies"had"to"provide"data"that"allowed"prevalence"to"be"assessed"in … August((2014)(
Link(to(Report$
Literature(Analysis((March(2016)$
No$studies$were$identified$that$assessed … Health$Questionnaire"9,$Generalized$Anxiety$Disorder$7"item$scale,$and$Satisfaction$with$
Life$Scale$assessed … Analysis(
(March(2016)$
Expert(Opinion( Surveillance(Assessment(
No$studies$were$identified$
that$assessed
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/carbohydrate-intake-protocol.pdf
April 08, 2024 - Abstracts and full texts will be assessed using the same process
of dual review as all other studies … Controlled trials and observational studies will be assessed using a priori established
criteria consistent … of bias for individual studies, the strength of evidence
(SOE) for each outcome will be initially assessed … Assessing Applicability
Applicability will be assessed in accordance with the AHRQ’s Methods Guide,
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/mhs-iv-nv-hap-protocol.pdf
August 05, 2024 - Quality Reporting)13 and one of
the conditions for which Excess Days in Acute Care (EDAC) Measures is assessed … studies published in 2010 or after, in
English, and performed in the U.S., and having each study assessed
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/nonopioid-chronic-pain-summary.pdf
April 01, 2020 - Assessment of Methodological Risk of
Bias of Individual Studies
Study quality was independently assessed … We preferentially abstracted pain assessed with
the visual analog scale (VAS) or numerical
rating scale … were
calculated for other outcomes (e.g., function,
quality of life) unless all pertinent studies assessed … The domains assessed were study limitations
(low, medium, or high), consistency (consistent,
inconsistent … The specific outcomes
assessed in the included RCTs also varied according
to the pain condition studied
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/pressure-ulcer-prevention_disposition-comments.pdf
May 08, 2013 - variability in rates: The
variation in estimates is due in part to differences in how
ulcers are assessed … As described in Appendix F and the Evidence
Tables, blinding is assessed separately for patients, care … Briefly: We assessed each set of trials and
determined that there was too much clinical heterogeneity … We systematically assessed the
available evidence on nutritional supplementation. … The guide for grading evidence
suggests that this should be assessed using “the boundaries of
the pooled
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/musculoskeletal-disorders-imaging_research-protocol.pdf
August 05, 2010 - the test in patient management
v Setting where positional MRI testing was performed
vi Outcomes assessed … Moreover, we will record the outcomes being
assessed in each study, including testing related harms,
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/assessing-the-risk-of-bias-in-systematic-reviews-of-health-care-interventions-01_0.pdf
May 01, 2005 - This requires the review’s protocol to include clear definitions of the types of biases
that will be assessed … Some EPC reviews may exclude studies assessed as
high risk of bias. … Published methodological quality of randomized
controlled trials does not reflect the actual quality
assessed
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/ocd-protocol.pdf
August 15, 2023 - Each study will be assessed by one researcher. … assessor blinding, missing data, outcome measurement
reporting adequacy, and analytic adequacy will be assessed … RCTs (i.e., related to missing data, outcome measurement, analysis plan).27 The questions
will be assessed … For single arm studies, we assessed methodological quality using items from the Cochrane
Risk of Bias
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/bereaved-persons-protocol.pdf
June 01, 2023 - Studies will be assessed with criteria consistent with domains assessed in QUIPS
(Quality in Prognosis … on the Key Question,
diagnostic and treatment approach, comparator, and outcome) will be initially assessed … Assessing Applicability
Applicability will be assessed in accordance with the AHRQ's Methods Guide.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/gout_research-protocol.pdf
November 03, 2014 - Methodological Risk of Bias of Individual Studies - Risk of bias of
individual included studies will be assessed … Publication bias will be assessed using the
Begg adjusted rank correlation test and Egger regression … asymmetry test; 22, 23; selective
outcome reporting bias will also be assessed as part of the risk
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/dementia-horizon-scan-high-impact-1406.pdf
February 01, 2015 - Investigators initially reported that intranasal
insulin administration improved delayed memory (p<0.05; assessed … by delayed story recall),
preserved caregiver-rated functional ability (p<0.01; assessed by Alzheimer … - cognitive subscale) and conserved patients’ general cognition and functional abilities
(p<0.05, assessed
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/disparities-quality-improvement_research-protocol.pdf
February 23, 2012 - population and
an appropriate internal or external referent group,a such that changes in disparity can
be assessed … The quality of individual studies will be assessed using
specific assessment tools for each type of … Poor studies will be
identified but not further assessed.