Results

Total Results: 1,977 records

Showing results for "assessed".

  1. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/disruptive-behavior-disorders-protocol-amendment.pdf
    March 22, 2023 - Randomized controlled trials and NRSIs will be assessed using a priori established criteria consistent … Grading the Strength of Evidence (SOE) for Major Comparisons and Outcomes: Outcomes to be assessed … , the strength of evidence for comparison-outcome pairs within each Key Question will be initially assessed … Applicability will be assessed in accordance with the AHRQ’s Methods Guide, using the PICOTS framework
  2. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/pdf/epc-pain-management-grand-rounds-slides.pptx
    March 01, 2022 - Presentation of a very large number of results Analytic Framework 11 Note: Restricted to studies that assessed … outcomes ≥1 m after completing treatment or ≥6 m after starting treatment; outcomes assessed at short
  3. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/methods-guidance-bias-individual-studies_methods.pdf
    March 01, 2012 - Generally speaking, exclude precision and applicability when assessing the risk of bias because these are assessed … x x x x x Were interventions/exposures assessed/defined using valid and reliable measures, implemented … x x x x x Were outcomes assessed/defined using valid and reliable measures, implemented consistently … x x x x x Were confounding variables assessed using valid and reliable measures, implemented consistently … For example, one commonly assessed component in RCTs is allocation concealment.51 Reviewers assess whether
  4. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/ptsd-6-protocol.pdf
    December 07, 2024 - transparency and ease of future updating, the EPC will include detailed definitions related to how RoB was assessed … the Strength of Evidence (SOE) for Major Comparisons and Outcomes: Strength of evidence will not be assessed … 33. 5.2) Is the numerical result being assessed likely to have been selected, on the basis of the results … 34. 5.3) Is the numerical result being assessed likely to have been selected, on the basis of the results
  5. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/antiplatelet-treatment_research-protocol.pdf
    November 22, 2011 - systematic reviews that included quantitative analyses (meta-analyses, published in 2010– 2011) have assessed … Four additional meta-analyses have assessed the predictive utility of phenotypic tests for platelet … Furthermore, existing reviews have not assessed comparative test performance for predicting outcomes … cardiovascular outcomes and an 18 percent increase in mortality. 19 However, no systematic review has assessed … each outcome of interest between more precise (larger) and less precise (smaller) studies will be assessed
  6. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/plasma-cell-dyscrasias-sflc-assay_executive.pdf
    August 01, 2012 - One C-quality retrospective study assessed the need for bone marrow examination, with the SFLC assay … In the present review, we assessed the comparative effectiveness of the SFLC assay as an adjunct to … Moreover, without studying a nondiseased population, true negatives cannot be assessed. … Discordance of the SFLC response and the response as assessed by traditional testing was reported, although … Without a population with no PCD, true negatives cannot be assessed.
  7. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/chronic-cough_research-protocol.pdf
    October 22, 2012 - For all studies, the overall study quality will be assessed as follows: • Good (low risk of bias). … Grading the Evidence for Each Key Question We will grade the strength of evidence for each outcome assessed … The strength of evidence will be assessed by using the approach described in the Methods Guide.15,18 … Assessment and Management of Chronic Cough We will grade the strength of evidence for each outcome assessed … The strength of evidence will be assessed by using the approach desc... VIII.
  8. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/clinical-pathway-methods-report-appendix-k.pdf
    February 01, 2018 - Study quality assessment: Guidelines assessed using Penn Medicine’s Center for Evidence-based Practice … (CEP) Trustworthy Guideline scale, systematic reviews assessed using modified AMSTAR (Assessing the … Study quality assessed Yes 8. Heterogeneity assessed Yes 9. Publication bias assessed Yes 10.
  9. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/cancer-anemia-update_research-protocol.pdf
    June 16, 2010 - Further, analyses of efficacy and safety are suggested, either assessed per the approved prescribing … undergoing a predefined anticancer therapy, with predefined criteria when and how tumor response will be assessed … Assessment of Applicability: Applicability of findings in this review will be assessed within the EPICOT … Selected studies will be assessed for relevance against target populations, interventions of interest … For QoL studies it will in addition be assessed whether patients were blinded towards their Hb levels
  10. 8 (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/methodsguide_chou_assessing_harms_when_comparing.pdf
    November 01, 2008 - Even when harms are appropriately assessed and reported, the applicability of efficacy trials to general … In more than one-half of the comparisons assessed, estimates of relative or absolute risk varied more … that the prevalence or incidence was zero. 4 It is also important to assess how adverse events are assessed … of summary scores to assess risk of bias. 64 At a minimum, key methodological aspects should be assessed … case-control studies) Studies do not exceed a defined threshold for risk of bias (e.g., studies assessed
  11. 8 (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/methods-guidance-harms_methods.pdf
    November 01, 2008 - Even when harms are appropriately assessed and reported, the applicability of efficacy trials to general … In more than one-half of the comparisons assessed, estimates of relative or absolute risk varied more … that the prevalence or incidence was zero. 4 It is also important to assess how adverse events are assessed … of summary scores to assess risk of bias. 64 At a minimum, key methodological aspects should be assessed … case-control studies) Studies do not exceed a defined threshold for risk of bias (e.g., studies assessed
  12. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cer-204-obesity-disposition-comments.pdf
    December 01, 2017 - of the studies considered were pre- registered (or registered at all) in a trial registry should be assessed … This should be assessed for the studies considered. … The extent to which this occurs should be assessed and described. … Was there any consideration of the ability of study designs to ensure that those in the population assessed … We clarified that these reviews assessed effectiveness, but we described them here because they used
  13. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/antibiotics-respiratory-infection_research-protocol.pdf
    September 22, 2014 - Notably, these reviews have not assessed the actual comparative effectiveness of various strategies. … validity (quality) of systematic reviews, randomized trials, and cohort and case control studies will be assessed … Reporting bias will be assessed following EPC guidance (Appendix A), 13 using tests for funnel plot … Selective outcome and analysis reporting bias will be assessed during individual study quality assessment … Assessing Applicability Applicability will be assessed by paying special attention to study eligibility
  14. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/single-group-studies_white-paper.pdf
    January 01, 2013 - The use of single group studies in comparative effectiveness reviews by type of interventions assessed … included in the study design, in which all subjects received a single intervention and the outcomes are assessed … The use of single group studies in comparative effectiveness reviews by type of interventions assessed … included 14 (67) Total single group studies included, median (25 th –75 th percentile) 21 (8–71) Assessed … As an example, the change in blood pressure is assessed in patients with renal artery stenosis before
  15. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/bundled-payments-quality-effects_executive.pdf
    August 01, 2012 - We assessed the methodological quality of individual studies and reviews as good (low risk of bias), … from the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Education) Working Group and assessed … residual confounding, although the expected direction of the effect of residual confounding could not be assessed … important contextual factors were described in reviewed studies, but their impact was not directly assessed … All reviewed studies assessed the impact of bundled payment relative to either fee-for-service or cost-based
  16. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/selecting-evidence.ppt
    January 01, 2010 - Finally, those OSs found to have the potential to answer key questions should be assessed carefully to … Reviewers must consider whether or not the risk of bias can be fully assessed. … Other observational studies should be evaluated for relevance and then assessed for risk of bias before
  17. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/selecting-evidence.ppt
    January 01, 2010 - Finally, those OSs found to have the potential to answer key questions should be assessed carefully to … Reviewers must consider whether or not the risk of bias can be fully assessed. … Other observational studies should be evaluated for relevance and then assessed for risk of bias before
  18. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/management-adhd-adults-protocol.pdf
    June 10, 2024 - attrition, reporting, and study-specific sources of bias: • Selection bias: For selection bias, we assessed … • Detection bias: Detection bias assessed whether outcome assessors were aware of the intervention … • Study-specific sources of bias: In addition to the types of bias listed above, we assessed other … Assessing Applicability Applicability will be assessed in accordance with the AHRQ Methods Guide and … The effects of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate on driving behaviors in young adults with ADHD assessed with
  19. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/management-adhd-adults-protocol-amendment.pdf
    January 08, 2025 - attrition, reporting, and study-specific sources of bias: • Selection bias: For selection bias, we assessed … • Detection bias: Detection bias assessed whether outcome assessors were aware of the intervention … • Study-specific sources of bias: In addition to the types of bias listed above, we assessed other … Assessing Applicability Applicability will be assessed in accordance with the AHRQ Methods Guide and … The effects of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate on driving behaviors in young adults with ADHD assessed with
  20. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/mhs-IV-rapid-response-deprescribing.pdf
    February 01, 2024 - What studies have assessed the effectiveness and unintended effects of deprescribing interventions … done for the MHS III report, in English and performed in the United States, and having each study assessed … What Studies Have Assessed the Effectiveness and Unintended Effects of Deprescribing Interventions … We identified 15 systematic reviews14,15,24,27,30-40 and 7 original research articles that assessed … Four new original research studies assessed barriers and enablers for specific deprescribing initiatives

Search the AHRQ Archive

Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.

Search Archive

Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site

You selected to view results for the following site: