Results

Total Results: 1,977 records

Showing results for "assessed".

  1. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/stem-cell-children_executive.pdf
    February 01, 2012 - The strength of the body of evidence for each indication was assessed according to the process specified … The strength of the body of evidence for each indication was assessed. … The strength of the body of evidence for each indication was assessed according to the principles described
  2. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/gout_research-protocol-2014.pdf
    January 01, 2014 - Methodological Risk of Bias of Individual Studies - Risk of bias of individual included studies will be assessed … Publication bias will be assessed using the Begg adjusted rank correlation test17 and Egger regression … asymmetry test18; selective outcome reporting bias will also be assessed as part of the risk of bias
  3. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/methods-guidance-tests-bias_methods.pdf
    July 01, 2012 - assessment of the major features that influence the importance of a study to key review questions are assessed … Thus, fairly or unfairly, studies with less meticulous reporting may be assessed as having been less … could represent a flaw that would cause the study to be excluded from the review, or included and assessed
  4. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/traumatic-brain-injury-rehabilitation_research-protocol.pdf
    October 25, 2010 - Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.0. 22 Summary scores for each individual study will be assessed … determines the overall risk of bias for each study—coded as yes, partial, or none—based on the criteria assessed … reconcile risk of bias summary judgements. randomized controlled trials and observational studies assessed
  5. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/nppv-respiratory-failure_research-protocol.pdf
    April 21, 2011 - – Psychological distress (e.g., anxiety) assessed by using a validated measure. … Grading the Evidence for Each Key Question We will grade the strength of evidence for each outcome assessed … The strength of evidence will be assessed by using the approach described in the General Methods
  6. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/bundled-payments-quality-effects_research-protocol.pdf
    June 23, 2011 - Heterogeneity will be assessed, based on analysis of the data abstracted on intervention design and … comparison have a high likelihood of adequate protection against bias (i.e., good internal validity), assessed … This can be assessed through two main elements: • Effect sizes have the same sign (i.e., are on
  7. Untitled (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/antipsychotics-children-update_research-protocol.pdf
    December 04, 2015 - Key outcomes that will be assessed for the strength of the body of evidence and considered for subgroup … Any studies suggested by Peer Reviewers or through public comment on the draft report will also be assessed … variables), the type of analysis (e.g., subgroup/stratified or regression analysis), the outcomes assessed … If one or more individual domains are assessed as having a high risk of bias, the overall score will … RCTs and NRCTs may be downgraded one or two levels depending on the numbers of trials assessed as having
  8. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/glaucoma-screening_disposition-comments.pdf
    April 01, 2012 - Outcomes would be assessed and compared among those who were identified via a screening based program … Outcomes would be assessed and compared among those who were identified via a screening based program … Quality of life and other patient reported outcomes would be assessed and compared among those who … In the methods we stated that "We assessed outcomes for Key Questions 1, 2, 4, and 5 at one year of … We assessed the quality of the systematic reviews and set minimum quality criteria for inclusion in
  9. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/lifecycle-assessment-disposition-comments.pdf
    November 20, 2024 - The Scopes framework only applies to climate change impacts assessed at an organizational level. … How exactly were gaps assessed?
  10. Layout 1 (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/ace-inhibitor-arb-update_executive.pdf
    June 01, 2011 - In that analysis, investigators assessed the conclusions from the original comparative effectiveness … Relatively few studies assessed Moderate (ACEI these outcomes over the long term. vs.
  11. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/pharma-nonpharma-ptsd-2023-update-app-g-1.xlsx
    January 01, 2023 - 5.2 Is the numerical result being assessed likely to have been selected, on the basis of the results, … 5.3 Is the numerical result being assessed likely to have been selected, on the basis of the results,
  12. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/fatigue-sleepiness-protocol.pdf
    July 01, 2023 - What studies have assessed the effectiveness and unintended effects of the PSPs and what new evidence … done for the MHS II report) in English and performed in the United States, and having each study assessed
  13. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/high-risk-drugs-protocol.pdf
    July 27, 2023 - What studies have assessed the effectiveness and unintended effects of PSPs (i.e., PSP 1 anticoagulant … very high” Human Development Index (according to the United Nations, 2019), and having each study assessed
  14. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/opioids-oa-protocol.pdf
    June 29, 2019 - Studies will not be assessed for methodological risk of bias. 3. … The study findings will not be summarized; thus Strength of Evidence will not be assessed. 11 … characterize the settings and included individuals in studies, but the evidence will not be formally assessed
  15. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/major-depressive-disorder_executive.pdf
    December 01, 2015 - We assessed statistical heterogeneity in effects between studies by calculating the chi-squared statistic … We assessed publication bias by checking study registries and using funnel plots and Kendall’s tests … Applicability We assessed applicability of the evidence following guidance from the Methods Guide for … Additionally, few trials adequately assessed harms or reported information on quality of life or functional
  16. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cer-193-naloxone-executive-summary.pdf
    November 01, 2017 - Risk of Bias Assessment of Individual Studies We assessed risk of bias of included studies using … Two investigators independently assessed risk of bias. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. … administration of naloxone), and type and level of training of people administering naloxone were recorded and assessed … transported, which makes findings difficult to interpret, as patients who refuse transport or are assessed
  17. S58 (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/s58.pdf
    October 01, 2007 - Completeness of encounter histories must be carefully assessed and inclusion criteria selected to minimize … Plausibility of observed utilization patterns for subgroups of concern should be assessed, and sensitivity … Lifetime prevalence, demographic risk factors, and diagnostic validity of nonaffective psy- chosis as assessed … Adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy assessed by pharmacy claims predicts survival in HIV-infected
  18. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/pneumonia-antibiotic-treatment_executive.pdf
    November 01, 2014 - Two independent reviewers assessed risk of bias for each study, assigning a rating of low, medium, or … Two reviewers independently assessed each domain for each key outcome and resolved differences by consensus … Applicability We assessed the applicability of both individual studies and the body of evidence following … outcomes (e.g., clinician judgment of patient signs and symptoms, laboratory values, quality of life assessed
  19. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/colon-cancer-gene-profiling_disposition-comments.pdf
    December 14, 2012 - Background P.3 Tumor Heterogeneity (comment) Please note that the impact of tumor heterogeneity is assessed … Please comment on the specific genes assessed in each assay, if possible, and describe the overlap … Report now describes nodes “assessed” and indicates this is now an important quality marker for colon … note that in all ColoPrint studies to date, a very low percentage of patients had less than 12 LN assessed
  20. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/labor-nitrous-oxide_executive.pdf
    August 01, 2012 - Quality Assessment The quality of individual studies was assessed using existing, widely accepted tools … When no studies were available for an outcome or comparison of interest, we assessed the evidence as … Satisfaction with pain management and the birth experience were assessed in KQ2. … Safety and analgesic efficacy assessed by a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Search the AHRQ Archive

Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.

Search Archive

Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site

You selected to view results for the following site: