Results

Total Results: 1,974 records

Showing results for "assessed".

  1. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/ptsd-adult-treatment_executive.pdf
    April 01, 2013 - Two independent reviewers assessed the risk of bias for each study; one of the two reviewers was always … Then, we assessed head-to-head trials. … Two reviewers assessed each domain for each key outcome and resolved differences by consensus. … Applicability We assessed applicability of the evidence following guidance from the “Methods Guide … Also, previous studies rarely assessed adverse effects with adequate rigor.
  2. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/menopause-protocol-130612.pdf
    June 12, 2013 - Systematic reviews and meta-analyses will be assessed and prioritized for inclusion in a manner informed … approach,32, 33 which is conceptually similar to the GRADE system.35 The four main domains to be assessed … Systematic reviews and meta- analyses will be assessed and prioritized for inclusion in a manner … study inclusion/exclusion criteria reported; 3) study quality (potential bias) of included trials assessed … During the search update, new SRs and RCTs not included in the original SRs will be assessed, appraised
  3. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/infantile-hemangioma_research-protocol.pdf
    December 23, 2014 - outcomes (KQ2, 3, 4) • Size / volume of hemangioma • Impact on vision • Aesthetic appearance as assessed … Intermediate Outcomes • Size / volume of hemangioma • Impact on vision • Aesthetic appearance as assessed … Intermediate Outcomes • Size / volume of hemangioma • Impact on vision • Aesthetic appearance as assessed … surgical unit) • Size / volume of hemangioma • Impact on vision • Aesthetic appearance as assessed … surgical unit) • Size / volume of hemangioma • Impact on vision • Aesthetic appearance as assessed
  4. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/head-neck-cancer-update_research-protocol.pdf
    February 04, 2014 - Grading the Strength of Evidence (SOE) for Individual Comparisons and Outcomes Studies will be assessed … for a given outcome have high likelihood of protection against bias (i.e., good internal validity), assessed … Assessing Applicability Applicability of findings in this review will be assessed according to the … (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Setting) framework.12, 16 Included studies will assessed … • The quality of studies will be assessed on the basis of the following criteria: – Initial assembly
  5. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/pdf/child-growth-development-outcomes-protocol.pdf
    August 19, 2024 - Abstracts and full texts will be assessed using the same process of dual review as all other studies … Controlled trials and observational studies will be assessed using a priori established criteria consistent … Grading the Strength of Evidence (SOE) for Major Comparisons and Outcomes Outcomes to be assessed for … prioritized list, the SOE for exposure/intervention-outcome pairs within each KQ will initially be assessed … Assessing Applicability Applicability will be assessed using the PICOTs framework, in accordance with
  6. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/health-information-exchange_research-protocol.pdf
    April 20, 2015 - High quality reviews will be defined as those assessed as being at low risk of bias, according to the … Literature identified during the update search will be assessed by following the same process of dual … as part of the data abstraction phase, and each major type of study will be assessed for bias according … Individual Comparisons and Outcomes The strength of evidence for each key question will be initially assessed
  7. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/antidepressants-update_disposition-comments.pdf
    December 01, 2011 - Affiliation Section Comment Response Peer Reviewer #5 Methods Pg 34, line 13-16 Quality Assessment “Items assessed … Simply saying how you identified effectiveness trials does not describe how you assessed applicability … Peer Reviewer #5 Results KQ1 Page 56 or page 42, line 30-31 Investigators rarely assessed quality of … Quality of life, however, was rarely assessed as a primary outcome measure.
  8. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/arthritis-psoriatric_surveillance.pdf
    March 01, 2013 - abstracting the study conditions and findings for each new included study into an evidence table, we assessed … assessments: • If we found no new evidence or only confirmatory evidence and all responding experts assessed … found some new evidence that might change the CER conclusion, and /or a minority of responding experts assessed … substantial new evidence that might change the CER conclusion, and/or a majority of responding experts assessed
  9. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/asthma-nonpharmacologic-treatment_research-protocol.pdf
    October 04, 2016 - Given the most recent report, EPR-3, was published in 2007,1 NHLBI assessed the need for an update by … When a study with an English abstract is published in a foreign language, the abstract will be assessed … Risk of bias will be assessed by two independent reviewers, and discrepancies will be addressed through … that conforms with the EPC Methods Guide recommendations on grading the SOE.10,23 The primary domains assessed
  10. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/disruptive-behavior-disorders-protocol.pdf
    January 31, 2023 - Randomized controlled trials and NRSIs will be assessed using a priori established criteria consistent … Grading the Strength of Evidence (SOE) for Major Comparisons and Outcomes: Outcomes to be assessed … the strength of evidence for comparison-outcome pairs within each Key Question will be initially assessed … Applicability will be assessed in accordance with the AHRQ’s Methods Guide, using the PICOTS framework
  11. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/celiac-disease_clinician.pdf
    July 01, 2016 - * The overall evidence grade was assessed based on the ratings for the following domains: study limitations … Endoscopy with duodenal biopsy The histology of a duodenal biopsy is assessed according to the Modified
  12. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/tech-brief-39-pediatric-cancer-survivorship-comments.pdf
    March 01, 2021 - A full systematic review of tracing each assessed disparity and the results of the findings across … Suggest adding a similar level of detail to the paragraph discussing studies that have assessed these … For example, in addition to noting the number of studies and the level of barriers assessed, it would … be helpful to summarize the strategies assessed (e.g., education). … to discussing ongoing studies, could the gaps in the published and unpublished studies that have assessed
  13. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/scarce-resources-protocol.pdf
    January 01, 2013 - was measured or could be inferred from the data provided, (4) generalizability of the findings was assessed
  14. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/treatment-resistant-depression_surveillance.pdf
    April 01, 2016 - evidence that might change the systematic review conclusion, and/or a minority of responding experts assessed … Two very small new uncontrolled trials report positive effects of rTMS on patients with TRD as assessed … Depression severity was assessed with the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale; primary efficacy … It has never been systematically assessed whether psychotherapy, continuation ECT, or antidepressant … very small new uncontrolled trials report positive effects of rTMS on patients with TRD as assessed
  15. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/get-involved/nominated-topics/diagnosis-and-treatment-of-low-back-painbr-key-questionsbr-olliin-patients-with-low-back-pain-what-are-the-benefits-and-harms-of-identifying-risk-factors-for-chronicity-and-targeting-treatment-based-on-assessed-riskliliin-pa
  16. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/peripheral-artery-disease-treatment_executive.pdf
    May 01, 2013 - Applicability We assessed applicability across our KQs using the method described in the Methods Guide … The following comparisons were assessed in the included studies: (1) medical therapy (cilostazol) versus … The Key Points are: • In a random-effects network meta-analysis of 12 RCTs that assessed the effect … We found few studies that assessed functional outcomes, quality of life, or cardiovascular outcomes … To examine the effectiveness of more invasive treatments, this review included any studies that assessed
  17. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/chronic-pain-opioid-treatment_executive.pdf
    September 19, 2014 - Assessing Methodological Risk of Bias of Individual Studies We assessed risk of bias (quality) for … Studies of predictive accuracy of risk prediction instruments were assessed using an approach adapted … Two investigators independently assessed the quality of each study. … We assessed the overall strength of evidence (SOE) for each Key Question and outcome using the approach … No study assessed the risk of abuse, addiction, or related outcomes associated with long-term opioid
  18. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/glaucoma-screening_disposition-comments.pdf
    April 01, 2012 - Outcomes would be assessed and compared among those who were identified via a screening based program … Outcomes would be assessed and compared among those who were identified via a screening based program … Quality of life and other patient reported outcomes would be assessed and compared among those who … In the methods we stated that "We assessed outcomes for Key Questions 1, 2, 4, and 5 at one year of … We assessed the quality of the systematic reviews and set minimum quality criteria for inclusion in
  19. Untitled (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/antipsychotics-children-update_research-protocol.pdf
    December 04, 2015 - Key outcomes that will be assessed for the strength of the body of evidence and considered for subgroup … Any studies suggested by Peer Reviewers or through public comment on the draft report will also be assessed … variables), the type of analysis (e.g., subgroup/stratified or regression analysis), the outcomes assessed … If one or more individual domains are assessed as having a high risk of bias, the overall score will … RCTs and NRCTs may be downgraded one or two levels depending on the numbers of trials assessed as having
  20. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/traumatic-brain-injury-rehabilitation_research-protocol.pdf
    October 25, 2010 - Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.0. 22 Summary scores for each individual study will be assessed … determines the overall risk of bias for each study—coded as yes, partial, or none—based on the criteria assessed … reconcile risk of bias summary judgements. randomized controlled trials and observational studies assessed

Search the AHRQ Archive

Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.

Search Archive

Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site

You selected to view results for the following site: