Results

Total Results: 1,974 records

Showing results for "assessed".

  1. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/ptsd-dispositIon-comments-2022.pdf
    January 01, 2022 - Perhaps the authors could note in the abstract that the strength of the evidence was not assessed for … We state that Strength of Evidence was not assessed for this review in the Methods section of the text … Additional studies from the prior reports will be assessed for ROB2 in future annual updates. … The authors mention in the discussion that RoB was assessed by one person and then checked, rather than
  2. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cer-216-telehealth-evidence-summary.pdf
    April 01, 2019 - Telehealth for consultations has been studied across a range of clinical situations but not previously assessed … Two team members independently reviewed all abstracts and two reviewers independently assessed each … Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews.14 Risk of bias for economic evaluations were assessed … Strength of evidence was assessed for each outcome and Key Question as described in the Methods Guide
  3. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/system/files/docs/topic-brief-apbi-breast-cancer.pdf
    August 01, 2022 - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27066193 A-1 Appendix A: Methods We assessed nomination for … Appropriateness and Importance We assessed the nomination for appropriateness and importance. … pubmed/ Impact of a New Evidence Review The impact of a new evidence review was qualitatively assessed … EXPAND[Term] RANGE[01/01/2017, 11/25/2020] (72) TRIAL RESULTS clinicaltrials.gov link Value We assessed
  4. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/system/files/docs/topic-brief-radiation-therapy-bone-metastases.pdf
    August 01, 2022 - A-1 Appendix A: Methods We assessed nomination for priority for a systematic review or other AHRQ … Appropriateness and Importance We assessed the nomination for appropriateness and importance. … pubmed/ Impact of a New Evidence Review The impact of a new evidence review was qualitatively assessed … StudyFirstPostDate] EXPAND[Term] RANGE[01/01/2016, 11/20/2020] (52) ClinicalTrials link Value We assessed
  5. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/impact-healthcare-algorithms-racial-ethnic-disparities-March-2.pdf
    May 15, 2023 - and KQ 2; selected eligible full-length research studies published in English for one or both KQs • Assessed … Longer term implications have not been assessed. … Downsides of potential over-screening were not assessed. … inequities • Ensure that algorithms included in clinical guidelines and recommendations statements are assessed
  6. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/pharma-nonpharma-ptsd-2022-update-app-g1.xlsx
    January 01, 2022 - 5.2) Is the numerical result being assessed likely to have been selected, on the basis of the results … 5.3) Is the numerical result being assessed likely to have been selected, on the basis of the results
  7. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/deprescribing-protocol.pdf
    July 01, 2023 - What studies have assessed the effectiveness and unintended effects of deprescribing and what new evidence … done for the MHS III report, in English and performed in the United States, and having each study assessed
  8. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cer-250-cannabis-other-plant-based-treatments-evidence-summary_0.pdf
    October 01, 2021 - Strength of evidence was assessed as low, moderate, high, or insufficient, and magnitude of effect was … assessed according to Table A.
  9. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/assessing-the-risk-of-bias_draft-report.pdf
    June 02, 2011 - Generally speaking, exclude precision and applicability when assessing the risk of bias since these are assessed … x x x x x Are interventions/exposures assessed using valid and reliable measures, implemented consistently … x x x x x Are primary outcomes assessed using valid and reliable measures, implemented consistently … x x x x x Are confounding variables assessed using valid and reliable measures, implemented consistently … For example, one commonly assessed component in RCTs is allocation concealment. 35 Reviewers assess
  10. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cer-252-infantile-epilepsies-executive-summary.pdf
    October 01, 2022 - • No studies assessed neuromodulation or gene therapy. 2 Methods We utilized standard methods
  11. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/safety-vaccines-protocol.pdf
    January 30, 2020 - We will apply the system to all assessed adverse events, thereby systematically identifying evidence … Events that were assessed in research studies but that did not occur will also be abstracted and entered … Assessment of Methodological Risk of Bias of Individual Studies: All included studies will be assessed … The synthesis will report how many studies have assessed an adverse event to answer KQ1a, KQ2a, and … For all influenza vaccines, asthma will be assessed.
  12. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/gastric-cancers-protocol-amendment.pdf
    May 02, 2025 - ROBINS-I comprises seven domains which will each be assessed: • Bias due to confounding • Bias in … The primary domains assessed include risk of bias, directness, consistency, precision, and reporting … How effects on health equity are assessed in systematic reviews of interventions. … Added text to clarify that in this situation, other domains will not be assessed.
  13. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/mhs-iv-nursing-staff-shortages.pdf
    October 01, 2024 - Healthcare Safer IV: Nursing Staff Shortages Review Questions Review Question What studies have assessed … the search to studies published in English, performed in the United States, and having each study assessed
  14. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/prostate-cancer-therapies-protocol_amended110619.pdf
    November 02, 2019 - Assessment of Methodological Risk of Bias of Individual Studies: Risk of bias of eligible RCTs will be assessed … Risk of bias for non-RCTs will be assessed using the ROBINS-I tool.15 8 One investigator … collect results data from the evidence tables of the previous review when studies and outcomes were assessed
  15. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/prostate-cancer-risk-assessment-genes_executive.pdf
    July 01, 2012 - We could not assess consistency of results for panels assessed in single studies only. … For one panel (Focus 5), evaluated in multiple studies, consistency could not be assessed quantitatively … However, when assessed using test evaluation designs, the risk models based on SNP panels improved the
  16. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/child-growth-development-outcomes-protocol-amended.pdf
    November 18, 2024 - Abstracts and full texts will be assessed using the same process of dual review as all other studies … Controlled trials and observational studies will be assessed using a priori established criteria consistent … Grading the Strength of Evidence (SOE) for Major Comparisons and Outcomes Outcomes to be assessed for … prioritized list, the SOE for exposure/intervention-outcome pairs within each KQ will initially be assessed … (narrative) data where appropriate. 15 Assessing Applicability Applicability will be assessed
  17. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/antiplatelet-treatment_disposition-comments.pdf
    September 25, 2013 - the evidence at the time of the Draft Report submission had low strength for some of the outcomes assessed … All types of blinding were assessed as applicable to each particular study design. … This is because similarity (exchangeability) is not quantitatively assessed and because the decision … Background fluorescence is assessed by simultaneously running a negative antibody control. … We assessed the SOE as low for the following reasons: (1) of the more than 100 studies reporting on
  18. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/trauma-informed-care-executive-summary.pdf
    January 01, 2025 - All included studies were assessed as high risk of bias.
  19. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/outcomes-dental-services-rapid-research.pdf
    May 01, 2025 - We assessed SRs using AMSTAR2.20 RoB2 determined RCTs to have low risk of bias, some concerns, or high … limited. 3.2.2 Included Studies Our literature database search identified one primary study that assessed … In addition, drug abstinence, employment, and homelessness were assessed at First Step House only. … SUD Treatment for SUD Intervention Group Treatment Control Group Treatment Outcomes Assessed … Study Design Sample Size Followup Length Type of SUD Treatment Comparison Outcomes Assessed
  20. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/colorectal-cancer-staging_research-protocol.pdf
    May 20, 2013 - Were patients assessed by a reference standard regardless of the test’s results? 11. … Were all patients assessed by the same reference standard regardless of the test’s results? 12. … Were those who assessed the patient’s outcomes blinded to the group to which the patients were assigned … Was the individual study quality assessed? 7a. … Was the likelihood of publication bias assessed? 10.

Search the AHRQ Archive

Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.

Search Archive

Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site

You selected to view results for the following site: