Results

Total Results: 1,977 records

Showing results for "assessed".

  1. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/tympanostomy-tubes-executive-170523.pdf
    May 01, 2017 - Appendix C, D and E of the full report. 6 Assessment of Risk of Bias of Individual Studies We assessed … per the AHRQ Methods Guide on assessing the strength of evidence.15 Assessing Applicability We assessed … There were 24 publications reporting 24 NRCSs that assessed the effectiveness of TT in pediatric patients … Two studies assessed the effects of TT and cleft repairing versus cleft repairing alone. … thresholds after TT placement with or without adenoidectomy improved by approximately 10 dB when assessed
  2. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cancer-decision-support-tools_disposition-comments.pdf
    December 23, 2014 - We acknowledge the reviewer’s point and would like to clarify that the assessed key questions were … During the extensive discussions with the TEP members and given the large variety of the assessed study … studies of any intervention to promote decision aid use, regardless of study design and outcomes assessed … way, we continued with single screening of the remaining abstracts.” and “All included papers were assessed … Corrected: “The assessed decision aids showed considerable heterogeneity in terms of format, content
  3. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cer-250-cannabis-2025-surv-rep-update-executive-sum.pdf
    January 01, 2025 - We included RCTs and comparative observational studies of minimum 4 weeks duration that assessed cannabinoids … Strength of evidence was assessed as low, moderate, high, or insufficient, and magnitude of effect was … assessed according to Table A.
  4. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/assessing-quality.ppt
    January 01, 2010 - Assessing the Quality of Individual Studies Assessing the Quality of Individual Studies Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Methods Guide on Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews Assessing the Quality of Individual Studies Systematic Review Process Overview * …
  5. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/lifecycle-assessment-protocol.pdf
    August 23, 2023 - population (framework target described in detail), and validity testing status (e.g., goodness of fit assessed
  6. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/celiac-disease_research-protocol.pdf
    June 12, 2014 - Existing reviews that we are considering including (in total or in part) as evidence will be assessed … Was the scientific quality of the included studies assessed and documented? 08. … Was the likelihood of publication bias assessed? … comparison have a high likelihood of adequate protection against bias (i.e., good internal validity), assessed … Consistency can be assessed through two main elements: • The range of study results is narrow.
  7. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/reporting.ppt
    September 01, 2009 - The symmetry of such “funnel plots” was assessed both visually, and formally with Egger’s test, to see … Give numbers of studies screened, assessed for eligibility, and included in the review. … reporting the study selection, authors should provide information on the numbers of studies screened, assessed … studies included in a review, authors should report all outcomes, including benefits and harms, that were assessed … …However, these studies assessed the results at nonuniform time points and therefore the findings may
  8. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/meditation_research-protocol.pdf
    October 17, 2012 - • Are interventions/exposures assessed using valid and reliable measures, implemented consistently … • Are primary outcomes assessed using valid and reliable measures, implemented consistently across … The overall risk of bias will be assessed as: • Good (low risk of bias). … Assessing Applicability Applicability will be assessed separately for the different outcomes for the … Methods Guide for Comparative Effectiveness Reviews of Interventions.29 Potential factors to be assessed
  9. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/case-management_executive.pdf
    January 01, 2013 - of comorbidities, patient age and socioeconomic status, social support, and/or level of formally assessed … We reviewed the findings of the studies for each of these categories and then assessed overall findings … The strength of evidence for each Key Question was initially assessed for the outcomes applicable to … Formally Assessed Health Risk Some studies explicitly targeted patients considered to be at high risk … of comorbidities, patient age and socioeconomic status, social support, and/or level of formally assessed
  10. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/home-based-care_research-protocol.pdf
    November 19, 2014 - Population Adults with chronic illnesses or disabilities Children with special needs Adults being assessed … Submissions are reviewed by the review team and assessed for relevance and quality. … Literature identified from the updated search will be assessed by following the same process of dual … Individual Comparisons and Outcomes The strength of evidence for each key question will be initially assessed … Rather than being admitted to the hospital the patient receives extended nursing care and is assessed
  11. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/infantile-epilepsy-amended-protocol.pdf
    March 07, 2021 - will not be based on a numerical score, but rather will be a subjective judgment based on the items assessed … We will grade the SOE based on the EPC Methods Guide recommendations.4 The primary domains assessed … the section on Assessment of Methodological Risk of Bias of Individual Studies Risk of bias assessed … for all outcomes Clarify that risk of bias need only be assessed for outcomes receiving
  12. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/dietary-protein-intake-protocol-amendment.pdf
    November 28, 2023 - trials (RCTs) by outcomes will be rated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0.21 Risk will be assessed … using the Risk of Bias In Non- randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool.22 Risk will be assessed … this systematic review, all metabolic studies in which protein or amino acid requirements are assessed … this systematic review, all metabolic studies in which protein or amino acid requirements are assessed
  13. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/plant-based-treatments-revised-protocol.pdf
    March 29, 2023 - Meta-analyses will be conducted using a random effects model, and statistical heterogeneity will be assessed … Publication bias (small sample size bias) will be assessed using funnel plots when there are eight or … quantitatively or qualitatively, the strength of evidence for each KQ/body of evidence will be initially assessed … moderate, large), or • The direction of effect changes Assessing Applicability Applicability will be assessed
  14. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cer-266-cdd-app-tabs-D2-D5.xlsx
    January 01, 2008 - Scientific Quality of Included Studies Assessed and Documented? … Likelihood of Publication Bias Assessed?
  15. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/grading-quiz.ppt
    October 08, 2025 - quality of individual studies and grading whole bodies of evidence Know the four required domains to be assessed
  16. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/grading-quiz.ppt
    October 08, 2025 - quality of individual studies and grading whole bodies of evidence Know the four required domains to be assessed
  17. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/prehospital-airway-management-protocol.pdf
    December 20, 2019 - Literature identified during the updated search will be assessed following the same process of dual … or qualitatively, the strength of evidence for each Key Question/body of evidence will be initially assessed … variation in a range of factors including populations, execution of the intervention, how outcomes are assessed
  18. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/dental-jaw-rapid-response.pdf
    May 01, 2025 - We assessed SRs using AMSTAR2.35 RoB2 determined RCTs to have low risk of bias, some concerns, or high … Some investigators have assessed the impact of non-surgical management of wound care in patients with … Risk of Bias Assessments We assessed the seven included cohort studies using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale … NI NI 5.2 Is the numerical result being assessed likely to have been selected on the basis of the … N N 5.3 Is the numerical result being assessed likely to have been selected on the basis of the results
  19. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/get-involved/nominated-topics/diagnosis-and-treatment-of-low-back-painbr-key-questionsbr-olliin-patients-with-low-back-pain-what-are-the-benefits-and-harms-of-identifying-risk-factors-for-chronicity-and-targeting-treatment-based-on-assessed-riskliliin-pa
  20. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cer-252-infantile-epilepsies-executive-summary.pdf
    October 01, 2022 - • No studies assessed neuromodulation or gene therapy. 2 Methods We utilized standard methods

Search the AHRQ Archive

Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.

Search Archive

Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site

You selected to view results for the following site: