Results

Total Results: 686 records

Showing results for "applicable".

  1. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/8dzfZ_s3tZueoEh5Xzh-3A
    July 26, 2016 - Nonapplicable: Study aim not applicable. Not original research: Study was not original research. … Abbreviations: CCR, California Cancer Registry; NA, not applicable; NR, not reported; SCREEN, Skin Cancer
  2. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/about-uspstf/methods-and-processes/evidence-based-prevention-resource-nurse-practitioners
    April 01, 2019 - preventive services is especially important and can be facilitated with better understanding of the applicable
  3. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/Z6Rfj-qwfoMbuLp-hBmhzS
    May 01, 2021 - number of studies per key question (KQ) exceeds the total number of studies because some studies were applicable … Questionnaire; MCID, minimal clinically important difference; MCS, mental component summary score; NA, not applicable … advancement device; MCS, mental component summary score; MVAP, Multivariable Apnea Prediction; NA, not applicable … results of trials that enroll partici- pants referred for OSA symptoms and other sleep issues may not be applicable
  4. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/Xbtq4oDQwVo7KgmSjnnDbz
    November 01, 2021 - 2.8 Intervention: 84 Control: 100 0.84 (0.73-0.96) Abbreviations: CRC, colorectal cancer; NA, not applicable … NR Abbreviations: CRC, colorectal cancer; FIT, fecal immunochemical test; Hb, hemoglobin; NA, not applicable … Limited studies with large number of endoscopists that were applicable to community practice.
  5. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evidence-summary/vision-in-children-ages-6-months-to-5-years-screening
    September 05, 2017 - Findings are applicable to a variety of settings and screening personnel. … Applicable to a variety of settings and screening personnel, although only 1 study was conducted completely
  6. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evidence-summary29/hepatitis-b-virus-infection-screening-nonpregnant-adolescents-adults-may-2014
    May 27, 2014 - mortality Fair HBeAg = hepatitis B e antigen; HBsAg = hepatitis B surface antigen; NA = not applicable … HBsAg = hepatitis B surface antigen; HBV = hepatitis B virus; MSM = men who have sex with men; NA = not applicable
  7. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-evidence-summary21/depression-in-children-and-adolescents-screening-2009
    March 15, 2009 - Because both studies examined only adolescents, no information was found that is directly applicable … Both of these studies examined only adolescents, so no information was found that is directly applicable … We focused on the RD, instead of RR, because the data are more directly applicable to comparing risks
  8. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/other-supporting-document19727/drug-use-illicit-primary-care-interventions-for-children-and-adolescents
    September 03, 2020 - ARD, absolute risk difference; IQR, interquartile range; MD, mean difference between groups; NA, not applicable … Sweden and the US Abbreviations: EPC, Evidence-based Practice Center; KQ, key question; NA, not applicable
  9. JAMA (pdf file)

    www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/GcjfCZtGpACQMv2KScLbEu
    June 11, 2019 - in timing of ART initiation Abbreviations: ART, antiretroviral therapy; KQ, key question; NA, not applicable
  10. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evidence-summary/abdominal-aortic-aneurysm-screening
    December 10, 2019 - Abbreviations: AAA, abdominal aortic aneurysm; MASS, Multicenter Aneurysm Screening Study; NA, not applicable … Surveillance vs Aortic Endografting for Small Aneurysm Repair; EVAR, endovascular aneurysm repair; NA, not applicable … Repair; CVD, cardiovascular disease; EVAR, endovascular aneurysm repair; KQ, key question; NA, not applicable
  11. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/_SBmXPhUQWo-dc85FJ5wHf
    February 01, 2015 - validity Inconsistent: sensitivity differs greatly in 1 study High: 3 of 4 studies used clinically applicable … specificity of 96%, PPV of 88%, and NPV of 97%. 3 studies of similar comparisons but with more clinically applicable … cardiovas- cular disease; HBPM = home blood pressure monitoring; MI = myocardial infarction; NA = not applicable
  12. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/dvcAbDQWejyK38oxF8qgka
    November 01, 2012 - Approaches to Longitudinal data; HPTN � HIV Prevention Trials Network; HR � hazard ratio; NA � not applicable … inconsistency for CD4 cell counts �0.500 � 109 cells/L 1 RCT evaluated CD4 cell count thresholds not applicable … hepatitis C virus; HDL � high-density lipoprotein; HR � hazard ratio; MI � myocardial infarction; NA � not applicable
  13. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evidence-summary-harms-of-screening-for-breast-cancer/breast-cancer-screening-january-2016
    January 11, 2016 - aged 40 to 49 years, with an overall biopsy rate of 19%. 12 The results of these highly clinically applicable … We included only studies that are applicable to current practice in the United States to improve clinical … Imaging Screening Trial; FP = false-positive; HADS = Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; NA = not applicable
  14. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/screening-for-hiv-in-adolescents-and-adults-evidence-summary/human-immunodeficiency-virus-hiv-infection-screening-2013
    November 20, 2012 - Approaches to Longitudinal data; HPTN = HIV Prevention Trials Network; HR = hazard ratio; NA = not applicable … inconsistency for CD4 cell counts >0.500 x 10 9 cells/L 1 RCT evaluated CD4 cell count thresholds not applicable … hepatitis C virus; HDL = high-density lipoprotein; HR = hazard ratio; MI = myocardial infarction; NA = not applicable
  15. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/obesity-screening-1996
    January 01, 1996 - the intensive dietary and behavioral interventions evaluated in these studies may not necessarily be applicable
  16. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evidence-summary/carotid-artery-stenosis-screening-july-2014
    July 08, 2014 - 2.2 to 3.7) CAAS = carotid angioplasty and stenting; CEA = carotid endarterectomy; NA = not applicable
  17. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/6XMRch-R3m4UMVoBMcv43f
    December 01, 2007 - 2.7 and 3.4 years, respectively; the estimated survival beyond the actual fol- low-up time may not be applicable
  18. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/T-DyWdyD67ktDMJGDp3jpm
    June 01, 2003 - No study provided information applicable to a screened population; the data from studies done in specialty
  19. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/khUSqr94jqWPErt9ZRnQ95
    October 01, 2009 - systematically rated the quality of all studies, and qualitatively appraised findings that are di- rectly applicable
  20. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/about-uspstf/methods-and-processes/procedure-manual/procedure-manual-section-3-topic-work-plan-development
    June 22, 2025 - determined on a topic and key question basis, depending on the questions and the quality of the most applicable

Search the AHRQ Archive

Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.

Search Archive

Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site

You selected to view results for the following site: