-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/sites/default/files/inline-files/uspstf_graphic.pdf
May 13, 2017 - THE USPSTF RECOMMENDATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
THE USPSTF RECOMMENDATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
1
STEP 1: TOPIC NOMINATION
Anyone can nominate a new topic or an update to an existing topic at any time, via the Task Force Web site.
The Task Force prioritizes topics based on several criteria, including the topic’…
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/about-uspstf/task-force-resources/uspstf-recommendations-development-process
May 01, 2021 - USPSTF Recommendations Development Process
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to WhatsApp
Share to Email
Print
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) is an independent group of national experts in prevention and evidence-based medic…
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/sites/default/files/inline-files/uspstf-recommendations-development-process-2021_0.pdf
January 01, 2021 - USPSTF Recommendations Development Process
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org
USPSTF Recommendations Development Process
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) is an independent group of national experts in prevention and
evidence-based medicine. The Task Force w…
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/sites/default/files/inline-files/uspstf-recommendations-development-process-2021.pdf
January 01, 2021 - USPSTF Recommendations Development Process
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org
USPSTF Recommendations Development Process
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) is an independent group of national experts in prevention and
evidence-based medicine. The Task Force w…
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/sites/default/files/inline-files/uspstf_devprocess_0.pdf
April 24, 2017 - USPSTF Recommendations Development Process
USPSTF Recommendations
Development Process
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) is an independent group of national experts in prevention
and evidence-based medici…
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/sites/default/files/inline-files/uspstf_devprocess.pdf
April 24, 2017 - USPSTF Recommendations Development Process
USPSTF Recommendations
Development Process
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) is an independent group of national experts in prevention
and evidence-based medici…
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/screening-for-hiv-in-pregnant-women-evidence-summary/human-immunodeficiency-virus-hiv-infection-screening-2013
November 15, 2012 - A fourth study, which analyzed European surveillance data for 7573 participants over 9 years and included … pregnancy
A: No treatment
B: Mono/dual therapy
C: HAART
489 mother–infant pairs were analyzed … Childhood
Antenatal ART regimen
A: ZDV-containing
B: ZDV-sparing
7573 mother–child pairs analyzed … /FTC + NVP
B: NVP
All neonates: NVP dose in hospital + ZDV for 1 wk
355 mother–infant pairs analyzed … ddI
D: ZD
Infants received same ART regimen as mother until age 6 wk
362 mother–infant pairs analyzed
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/mTPBWPMDqfuWvodfd5R5Ms
November 01, 2012 - A fourth study, which analyzed European surveillance
data for 7573 participants over 9 years and included … hospitals ART during pregnancy
A: No treatment
B: Mono/dual
therapy
C: HAART
489 mother–infant pairs were analyzed … Pregnancy and
Childhood
Antenatal ART
regimen
A: ZDV-containing
B: ZDV-sparing
7573 mother–child pairs analyzed … A: TDF/FTC � NVP
B: NVP
All neonates: NVP dose in hospital �
ZDV for 1 wk
355 mother–infant pairs analyzed … d4T � ddI
D: ZDV
Infants received same ART regimen
as mother until age 6 wk
362 mother–infant pairs analyzed
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/draft-recommendation/breastfeeding-interventions
October 22, 2024 - point (initiation, less than 3 months, 3 to 6 months, and 6 months) varied from 27 to 51 trials (N analyzed … Generally, the number of participants analyzed for each of these outcomes was much smaller, making it
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/brief-evidence-summary/bladder-cancer-screening-2004
June 07, 2004 - Two reviewers independently analyzed all citations and culled abstracts that fit eligibility criteria
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/NZcLsqV-5K7hyfot-qHQp9
November 01, 2004 - Two reviewers independently analyzed all
citations and culled abstracts that fit eligibility
criteria
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/ResearchPlanFinal/carotid-artery-stenosis-screening-december-2007
January 23, 2014 - Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to WhatsApp
Share to Email
Print
archived
Final Research Plan
Carotid Artery Stenosis: Screening, December 2007
January 23, 2014
Recommendations made by the USPSTF are independent of the U.S. government. The…
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-research-plan36/carotid-artery-stenosis-screening-december-2007
January 23, 2014 - Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to WhatsApp
Share to Email
Print
archived
Final Research Plan
Carotid Artery Stenosis: Screening, December 2007
January 23, 2014
Recommendations made by the USPSTF are independent of the U.S. government. The…
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/sites/default/files/inline-files/from-topic-nomination-to-clinical-practice-resources-overview.pdf
June 01, 2021 - From Topic Nomination to Clinical Practice: Making a Task Force Recommendation
From Topic Nomination to Clinical Practice:
Making a Task Force Recommendation
An Overview of Task Force Processes and Methods
June 2021
How to Read This Presentation
This presentation gives an overview of the processes and metho…
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/about-uspstf/methods-and-processes/procedure-manual/procedure-manual-section-4-evidence-review-development
March 30, 2025 - inclusion, clearly identifies which studies are of poor quality, and states how poor-quality studies are analyzed … recruitment setting and approach
Number of participants who were recruited, randomized, received treatment, analyzed
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/khUSqr94jqWPErt9ZRnQ95
October 01, 2009 - We estimated CIs by using re-
ported SEs for the coefficient of CRP level when studies
analyzed CRP level … Follow-up,
y
Men, %* Outcome Framingham
Risk Factors,
n†
Other
Adjusted
Covariates,
n
CRP Quantile
Analyzed … Follow-up,
y
Men, %* Outcome Framingham
Risk Factors,
n†
Other
Adjusted
Covariates,
n
CRP Quantile
Analyzed … drawn from
reference lists and
other sources (n = 10)
Articles retrieved (n = 122)
Articles meta-analyzed … (n = 23; 24 cohorts)
Good-quality articles meta-analyzed with
adjustment for all FRS variables
(n
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-research-plan18/drug-use-illicit-primary-care-interventions-for-children-and-adolescents-march-2014
May 15, 2013 - in which >50% of participants are age <18 years OR the subgroup of participants age <18 years is analyzed
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/draft-recommendation/glaucoma-screening-adults-older-adults
October 26, 2021 - in progress
Draft Recommendation Statement
Screening for Glaucoma
October 26, 2021
Recommendations made by the USPSTF are independent of the U.S. government. They should not be construed as an official position of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or the U.S. Department of Health and Hu…
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/draft-recommendation/primary-angle-glaucoma-screening
October 26, 2021 - in progress
Draft Recommendation Statement
Screening for Primary-Angle Glaucoma
October 26, 2021
Recommendations made by the USPSTF are independent of the U.S. government. They should not be construed as an official position of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or the U.S. Department of…
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/sites/default/files/2025-03/uspstf-who-we-are-how-we-work-2025.pdf
January 01, 2025 - USPSTF: Who We Are & How We Work
USPSTF: Who We Are & How We WorkUSPSTF: Who We Are & How We Work
Table of Contents
About the Task Force ......................................................... 1
Our Approach: Evidence-Based, Objective, and Transparent ... 2
How We Develop Recommendations .....................…