-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/kid/kid_2009_introduction.jsp
January 01, 2009 - Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Wisconsin.
3: South
Alabama
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/NIS_Introduction_2013.jsp
January 01, 2013 - , Georgia , Florida
Division 6 ( East South Central ) Kentucky , Tennessee , Mississippi , Alabama
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/projections/2012-02.pdf
January 01, 2012 - the total division discharges except for the East South Central division, which is missing data
from Alabama
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/NIS_Introduction_2008.jsp
January 01, 2008 - Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Wisconsin.
3: South
Alabama
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/NIS_Introduction_2007.jsp
January 01, 2007 - Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Wisconsin.
3: South
Alabama
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/kid/KID_2009_Introduction.pdf
January 01, 2009 - Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska,
North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Wisconsin.
3: South
Alabama
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/2006NIS_INTRODUCTION.pdf
November 01, 2015 - , Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska,
North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Wisconsin.
3: South Alabama
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/projections/2013-01.pdf
January 01, 2013 - the total division discharges except for the East South Central division, which is missing data
from Alabama
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/reports/2012niscomparisonrpt.jsp
April 18, 2016 - plus the District of Columbia, are not included in the 2012 NIS sampling frame: Idaho, Mississippi, Alabama
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/methods/2015-04.pdf
January 01, 2015 - plus the District of Columbia, are not included in the 2012 NIS
sampling frame: Idaho, Mississippi, Alabama
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/NIS_Introduction_2010.jsp
January 01, 2010 - Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota , Ohio, South Dakota, Wisconsin.
3: South
Alabama
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/NIS_Introduction_2009.jsp
January 01, 2009 - Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Wisconsin.
3: South
Alabama
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/NIS_Introduction_2011.jsp
January 01, 2011 - Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Wisconsin.
3: South
Alabama
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/NIS_2007_INTRODUCTION.pdf
January 01, 2007 - , Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska,
North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Wisconsin.
3: South Alabama
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/NIS_2008_INTRODUCTION.pdf
January 01, 2008 - , Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska,
North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Wisconsin.
3: South Alabama
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/annualreport/HAR_2005.pdf
January 01, 2005 - South is defined as Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, District of
Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Maryland
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/NISIntroduction2010.pdf
November 01, 2015 - Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska,
North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Wisconsin.
3: South
Alabama
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/NIS_Introduction_2011.pdf
January 01, 2011 - Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska,
North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Wisconsin.
3: South
Alabama
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/reports/NIS_2012_Redesign_report.jsp
January 01, 2012 - Central )
Kentucky ,
Tennessee ,
Mississippi ,
Alabama
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/NIS_2009_INTRODUCTION.pdf
January 01, 2009 - Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska,
North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Wisconsin.
3: South
Alabama